Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sharris952, post: 2598986, member: 7956"] I think most on here who have otherwise biased view against Dawn are not seeing the point. I highly doubt that the Mizzou Ad could get or seek damages given the clear audio of his assertions. All he needed to do was give the retraction for lack of proof or produce the proof. For all the legal heads on this board, consider that South Carolina had already submitted a review of its game procedures to the SEC, prior to the meeting of the AD's so that statement was a political one to maintain a neutral relationship. There will also be implied lack of proof due to the 25k fine already levied by the commissioner, especially since this will be heard in State Court. If for nothing else, this will most likely deter Sterk or any other ADs from being this reckless in the future. Think of it this way so we can put away our "everything dawn does irritates me bias.a" Saying Geno is a jerk or arrogant is one thing but saying he promoted an atmosphere to call his players an Italian or other epithet that is used in poor circles to decribe girls that represent the majority of his Uconn team would invoke another type of emotion. Then if you try to get a conclusion and the person basically thumbs their nose at it, what would Geno do. He speaks his mind and Dawn and Muffet, all coaches from Philadelphia don't just let ignorance ride on by. [/QUOTE]