In order to win the lawsuit she would need to prove that his statements were intentionally trying to harm her. If he believed that his statements were in fact true because that was what was reported back to him, I do not see how they can find him guilty. Also, I remember seeing parts of the game, and that crowd was intense. Just as it would be hard to prove that the 18000 people were all nasty and inappropriate, it is even more difficult to prove that a few people of that 18000 didn't act appropriately.... in other words... it is going to be extremely hard to prove that all the fans were appropriate at all times. We cannot even do that at a UCONN game. I have heard some really interested things shouted at the refs when people disagree with the calls.. (granted not normally at the players...).... I just think it is going to be difficult to prove or disprove anything here