Dangerfield | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Dangerfield

From Geno's comments during the year it sounds like at the beginning of the year Dangerfield just wasn't working very hard (by his standards - she probably thought she'd never make it thru practice), and that the effort is still inconsistent. Combined with a certain "hard-headedness" that seems to be present with a lot of highly touted, all-everything, players. Stewie had it, Maya did, Dee, Sveta did, etc. Along with the pressure she carries of "no-Kia". All that said, she's getting better, and she'll be fine, but it will probably be sometime next year before she earns the elusive "Geno trust".
No she may gain Geno's trust on Senior Nite of her Senior year. Maya --hard headed?? That nice-est-sweet-est, hard playing kid?? Never! DT--Sveta--Tina--you bet.
 
Really ? Just what pressure has Danger faced before the Tulane game ? Besides coming in and fitting in w/ 4 starters . And why isn't Slocum hitting that big freeshman wall ?

The pressure to perform at UCONN is one answer to your first question. The answer(s) to your second question are that Slocum is on the court more and as of now, has more playing experience and confidence than Crystal Dangerfield. The wall doesn't always come up in a freshman year.
 
You're absolutely correct, HF 21. Frosh Mo was definitely not Junior or Senior Mo. Teams laid off Jefferson because she couldn't hit a 3 during her first season. She got MUCH better in time and finally became probably the most talented point guard in UConn history. Whether Crystal will follow the same trajectory is anyone's guess. No one doubts she has the talent, and being tossed into a must-play role absent Kia isn't easy on a team that never loses. There have been several highlights for Dangerfield this season and a lot of ordinary performances. I admit that seeing her miss the fouls shots that could have put the game away at Tulane was an embarrassment of sorts. No quality player should choke from the free-throw line repeatedly. But it happens, and it's done. Better days lie ahead for Crystal and for our Huskies. We are dealing with homo sapiens not a homo deus. Let's keep the faith.

Isn't it interesting that when the Category for Humans was established---they called them SAP--iens.
Robotic WBB players would be so much more predictable--
 
Kinda early to expect these lofty expectations that you have from a freshman at Connecticut. As posters previously stated above, she's been injured and missed time. Also players ranked as high and in some instances, higher have had their struggles as freshman playing for this school. (Also great points mentioned above). We all know how that turned out. Let's get her completely healthy, more experienced and confident and see what happens.

My final point is even though she has the accolades from AAU and USA tournament ball, playing college is a different game and she'll adjust.

Pointers for evaluation of humans on the job or in sports --without exact, on this job experience--must use that which is available-- and with Danger USA and AAU and HS--was that which was available. If her performances there were less than stellar--no one would have recruited her. But those performances were almost beyond spectacular! Those performances --without serious injuries--are and were indicators of a highly talented kid who performed at the highest of levels then available to her. She shall, if not injured, perform at the highest College level--count on it.
 
Jefferson's advice to Dangerfield?

"She told me that I don't need to go in there and be like her, that I need to go in there and be like Crystal Dangerfield," Dangerfield said.

Dangerfield, Bent Take Different Paths To Storrs, But Both Expect To Add To UConn's Legacy

I think she has to be herself and not compare to Mo. Unfortunately, the honeymoon period with Geno is over.

Auriemma said. "I've not been patient … I was in the beginning, but I'm not a very patient guy. Because if you're really patient, people take forever. So I don't want to be patient. I want them to hurry up and get good. And she's just not in a hurry. And it really pisses me off that she's not in a hurry. There's no sense of urgency."

Geno want consistent high effort, smart plays, low turnovers and no fouls. By the way, don't miss those lay ups. That's all being asked of the frosh. I know she'll get there - I hope sooner rather than later.
 
.-.
Its difficult to compare Slocum and Crystal Dangerfield just yet. Slocum has been handed the keys to PG position and averages 30 min per game and practices with the first team everyday.That experience has to do wonders for your confidence and comfort level particularly with her supporting cast. Crystal Dangerfield had an injury and usually plays with a lineup that varies every few minutes. It will just take a bit longer for her comfort level to settle in, particularly to get to a point where she is not thinking too much and playing instinctively.
Having watched Slocum play a couple times and knowing what Crystal Dangerfield can do with the ball including pinpoint passing, I'd rather have CD on the team as , IMO, she has more upside than Slocum.
 
I am kind of thinking it is in her head, she played great against Baylor and pretty good against South Carolina so why has she struggled against teams that may not be as good? Geno has seen her all season and that is why he has said that she doesn't all ways like to work up a sweat. It is end of the season she is no longer a freshmen, time for Crystal to shine and I am hoping it starts tonight.
Baylor and uS Carolina played BASKETBALL --not helter skelter, frenetic multiple arms waving defense--that got to the entire Uconn team, not just Danger--also freshmen tend to feed off of the STARS--who didn't perform up to snuff in that game--some entire teams fail when the star can't carry her part of the load. So the "pressure" got to the entire team and as the least experienced kid on the floor--it bit her (Danger) during free throw. I don't knock any one on the UConn team for the Tulane game--they were hit with the unexpected--great Tulane game plan and it took everyone out of sync.
That was the learning game--you bet your bippy---Geno will be LEARNING this team..
 
I know a big part of the fun being on these boards is speculating every aspect of how our women are playing, but for my money, I think we really over analyze at times.

I didn't see the Tulane game so I am not privy to what facial expression Crystal wore. Nor am I privy to any of the team's practices to have a sense of what level effort she gives and how it matches up to the coaches' standards - and I don't take what Geno says without a really huge grain of salt.

IMO, we have no clue what impacts a player's performance on any given night. Regarding a situation like Crystal missing free throws: It could be hitting a freshman wall. Or it could be she just heard terrible news from home, or bombed a test that morning, or had a really bad headache. Or maybe she just missed the shots. Happens now and then.
 
No she may gain Geno's trust on Senior Nite of her Senior year. Maya --hard headed?? That nice-est-sweet-est, hard playing kid?? Never! DT--Sveta--Tina--you bet.

I think a distinction needs to be made with respect to Maya and the others in this group when it comes to "hard-headedness" vs. "effort, drive, discipline, focus" or however you want to phrase it.

Maya was hard-headed. Still is to some extent, I'm sure; most of the great ones are. She famously decamped to Geno's office after the FF loss to Stanford her freshman year, where she announced an epiphany she'd had, that she "could not win the game all by herself." Which Geno had been trying to tell her. The others listed (DT, Stewie, Sveta, possibly Tina) also were hard-headed in their own way.

However,

When it comes to the issue of Crystal needing to ramp up the intensity, and give 100% on a consistent basis--at the UCONN WBB level that Geno expects--this is very much par for the course for players in their freshman year. Almost everyone that has stepped through the door has had their eyes opened to what it really means to sacrifice, perform and give the real 100% all the time, consistently. Particularly for many of the uber-talented, since they have been able to do so much at a lower level of intensity than Geno demands at the college level. It's a shock to the system. Geno & Co. push them to reveal what their true 100% really is. This is a process.

But this is where Maya set herself apart. To my knowledge, she came already equipped in this respect. (Possibly Kelly Faris as well.) She always always always gave her true 100%, for every minute, in every drill, in every moment, in every play, in every situation, from day 1. Not day 50, or day 100, or day 200, but day 1. I'm not saying that Maya didn't grow, didn't develop and didn't need coaching just as anyone else ever has. But her drive was singular, and it never wavered. Further, it pushed others to greater heights.

Edit: OK - I have to qualify what I just said ... :) there was one (and only one) time that I saw Maya's energy and effort at less than 100%. It was late in the streak-busting loss to Stanford. I remember distinctly a few moments where she was no longer hustling and busting her ass the way she normally did. It might not have been noticeable with mere mortals but with her, it definitely was. She showed she was human! The rest of the time at UCONN, she was in Geno's words, "like a Corporation."
 
Its difficult to compare Slocum and Crystal Dangerfield just yet. Slocum has been handed the keys to PG position and averages 30 min per game and practices with the first team everyday.That experience has to do wonders for your confidence and comfort level particularly with her supporting cast. Crystal Dangerfield had an injury and usually plays with a lineup that varies every few minutes. It will just take a bit longer for her comfort level to settle in, particularly to get to a point where she is not thinking too much and playing instinctively.
Having watched Slocum play a couple times and knowing what Crystal Dangerfield can do with the ball including pinpoint passing, I'd rather have CD on the team as , IMO, she has more upside than Slocum.
Different coaches different modes of operation---MD say to they Frosh--GO. Geno say---slow it down, learn Defense, and if you practice hard you play---I don't believe MD has the same view. The Slocum kid scores and dishes--did so before she arrive at MD--MD's coach expects her team to cover the mistakes of the Frosh--Geno doesn't like mistakes. Different approach.
An interesting question, without an answer: How would Crystal Dangefield perform at MD???
 
.-.
Like a lot of posters, being a very long time husky fan , I tend to be a lot tougher criticizing men's basketball than women's. Why? [mod edit: removed knock on the board #1] When I watch our ladies play, I try and separate what my eyes see from " my attachment " to this team. I think it is high time Dangerfield begins to start playing to a " higher " standard ! She came into the program as the highest rated point guard, with a long list of USA basketball and hs credentials. We see a few flashes of " brilliance ", and suddenly everyone go OOH , AAH ! THEN I watch Destiny Slocum ! Enough said. Danger was put in a highly pressurized , end of game situation against tulane, really for the first time. Totally different situation than against Baylor. The look on Danger's face at the line against Tulane, was that of an Fear/AWAKENING . The next couple of weeks will be make or break her as far as this season goes , and how she is utilized during the tournament !
I think we were all shocked when we saw Crystal fail at crunch time against Tulane. She could have put the game away several times, and could not do so. She did not use her basketball IQ, when she could have dribbled away from that defender and run out the clock. She then clanked two more free throws. Instead of solidifying her confidence, she had to go to sleep for the last four days thinking about her failure at the foul line. It is most fortunate for her that Tulane could not finish the game with a win. For those of us who are asked to remember Moriah's freshman year, I seem to recall a pretty polished player by this point. Though I am willing to admit I could be wrong. In any case, we all want Crystal to blossom into the star that she can become. And UCONN needs that, because our bench strength is, otherwise, scary thin.
 
I think a distinction needs to be made with respect to Maya and the others in this group when it comes to "hard-headedness" vs. "effort, drive, discipline, focus" or however you want to phrase it.

Maya was hard-headed. Still is to some extent, I'm sure; most of the great ones are. She famously decamped to Geno's office after the FF loss to Stanford her freshman year, where she announced an epiphany she'd had, that she "could not win the game all by herself." Which Geno had been trying to tell her. The others listed (DT, Stewie, Sveta, possibly Tina) also were hard-headed in their own way.

However,

When it comes to the issue of Crystal needing to ramp up the intensity, and give 100% on a consistent basis--at the UCONN WBB level that Geno expects--this is very much par for the course for players in their freshman year. Almost everyone that has stepped through the door has had their eyes opened to what it really means to sacrifice, perform and give the real 100% all the time, consistently. Particularly for many of the uber-talented, since they have been able to do so much at a lower level of intensity than Geno demands at the college level. It's a shock to the system. Geno & Co. push them to reveal what their true 100% really is. This is a process.

But this is where Maya set herself apart. To my knowledge, she came already equipped in this respect. (Possibly Kelly Faris as well.) She always always always gave her true 100%, for every minute, in every drill, in every moment, in every play, in every situation, from day 1. Not day 50, or day 100, or day 200, but day 1. I'm not saying that Maya didn't grow, didn't develop and didn't need coaching just as anyone else ever has. But her drive was singular, and it never wavered. Further, it pushed others to greater heights.

Edit: OK - I have to qualify what I just said ... :) there was one (and only one) time that I saw Maya's energy and effort at less than 100%. It was late in the streak-busting loss to Stanford. I remember distinctly a few moments where she was no longer hustling and busting her ass the way she normally did. It might not have been noticeable with mere mortals but with her, it definitely was. She showed she was human! The rest of the time at UCONN, she was in Geno's words, "like a Corporation."

I watch a whole different Maya and while Geno spoke of Maya's not doing anything except shooting 3's --which she did after her frosh year. She never had open disagreements with Geno--Sveta did constantly in the media. Dt was someone who told the coach , as a frosh , what he should do.
Then Stanford game was a Wiggins game--experienced as a Senior against a Frosh. Stanford like ND and most good coaches went after the Frosh--melt down, if by any one blame the coach.
I'd love to have read the media that said --Maya disagrees with the coach (hard headed)--Maya won't do as Geno says--(she'd sit) , Maya won't hustle (she'd sit).
Maya --like the end of the DT era was a bit of the only member of the team--and still a very nice young lady.
 
That may be true, but she played like an AA against Connecticut and if she'd gotten any help from SWK or anyone else(Kaila Charles was in foul trouble) that game may have ended differently. The tOSU game is an unfair comparison, because she spent the evening guarding Kelsey Mitchell not an easy task for any single player, not named Moriah Jefferson....
SWK had 29 points... they needed their bench to step up but it didn't and tOSU bench outscored theirs 27-7.
 
magic, I think you're spinning your wheels, because trying to "read" Geno on any specific point (as opposed to, say, reading him over time) is nearly impossible. It's extremely tough for me to know what I'm thinking at a given moment, let along for me to know what someone else is thinking, let alone to know what a master psychologist and BS artist like Geno is thinking at any given moment. The best we can do is pull back, appreciate his unbelievable success and how over time he both respects and treats players. I think that's what oldude is reflecting.
Of course I appreciate Geno, the coaching staff, and the whole program. I would not have evev been upset if they had lost to Tulane given the way huskies shot the ball. Any team can have a horrible shooting night. I just find it hard to believe that Geno is not looking for a way to either motivate or inspire self motivation to improve her consistency and play.
 
I think we were all shocked when we saw Crystal fail at crunch time against Tulane. She could have put the game away several times, and could not do so. She did not use her basketball IQ, when she could have dribbled away from that defender and run out the clock. She then clanked two more free throws. Instead of solidifying her confidence, she had to go to sleep for the last four days thinking about her failure at the foul line. It is most fortunate for her that Tulane could not finish the game with a win. For those of us who are asked to remember Moriah's freshman year, I seem to recall a pretty polished player by this point. Though I am willing to admit I could be wrong. In any case, we all want Crystal to blossom into the star that she can become. And UCONN needs that, because our bench strength is, otherwise, scary thin.

Long time---come on, you as I were not Shocked to see Danger have issues under pressure at the end of the game---did you look at the performances of the rest of the team prior to that?/ They all were not living up to expectation--and looked often bewildered when all those easy layups and 3's failed to go in.

I wasn't shocked---I saw the look on her face--I did hope for better--but she was the target of the Tulane coach in crunch time--she knew Freshmen with limited playing time are the weakest links at crunch time--and so do you and I. No shock.
 
.-.
SWK had 29 points... they needed their bench to step up but it didn't and tOSU bench outscored theirs 27-7.
SWK---even with 29 points didn't get enough touches last in the game and those shots taken by Slocum--probably would have been made by SWK... (my favorite MD player)
 
I think we were all shocked when we saw Crystal fail at crunch time against Tulane. She could have put the game away several times, and could not do so. She did not use her basketball IQ, when she could have dribbled away from that defender and run out the clock. She then clanked two more free throws. Instead of solidifying her confidence, she had to go to sleep for the last four days thinking about her failure at the foul line. It is most fortunate for her that Tulane could not finish the game with a win. For those of us who are asked to remember Moriah's freshman year, I seem to recall a pretty polished player by this point. Though I am willing to admit I could be wrong. In any case, we all want Crystal to blossom into the star that she can become. And UCONN needs that, because our bench strength is, otherwise, scary thin.
The idea that Danger could have dribbled away from the defender is a stretch. If you look at the play, Danger had her back to the defender and was leaping and falling backwards, towards the defender to steal the ball. She would almost have had to reverse her momentum in midair to miraculously avoid being fouled. While it would have been nice to see her make the foul shots, the play itself was tremendous.

As for Mo, go back and take a look at some of the games late in her freshman season, including the NCAA tournament. Sometimes she played well, but on other occasions she came in for a few minutes, turned the ball over a couple times, shot a couple bricks and earned a seat on the bench for the remainder of the game.

In the championship game vs Louisville, Mo played 14 minutes, mostly at mop-up time. She had 3 pts, 3 assists, 2 to's, 2 fouls, 0 steals & 0 rb's.
 
The idea that Danger could have dribbled away from the defender is a stretch. If you look at the play, Danger had her back to the defender and was leaping and falling backwards, towards the defender to steal the ball. She would almost have had to reverse her momentum in midair to miraculously avoid being fouled. While it would have been nice to see her make the foul shots, the play itself was tremendous.

As for Mo, go back and take a look at some of the games late in her freshman season, including the NCAA tournament. Sometimes she played well, but on other occasions she came in for a few minutes, turned the ball over a couple times, shot a couple bricks and earned a seat on the bench for the remainder of the game.

In the championship game vs Louisville, Mo played 14 minutes, mostly at mop-up time. She had 3 pts, 3 assists, 2 to's, 2 fouls, 0 steals & 0 rb's.
Which was basically Mo's season in a nutshell. I'm sure there were doubters back then too.
 
This points to a really, really interesting phenomenon. UConn recruits extremely highly ranked high school players who, in their early UConn careers, often seem to underperform other highly recruited players at other colleges. Perhaps UConn's recruits just aren't as good? Well, no, because by the time they graduate they're All-Americans.

It may be therefore that there's method in Geno's madness. That he's investing a year or more in breaking down his players and rebuilding them into champions. Sure, they're also under more stress (and miss foul shots) because they're not playing in their comfort zone--which in high school was to be the star. But eventually virtually all of them seem to make the transition to being cogs in a well-oiled machine and, as well, All-Americans in their own right.

Patience!

Good stuff again---I have pondered that of which you speak.
In previous years and previously this season I asked the question---why do Top Recruits perform at ND ,Duke, MD , elsewhere at a top level and Uconns kids sometimes don't. (Notice the sometimes). Because not all of Uconn newly commissioned players from recruits have performed highly---Rene, Maya, DT,
KML, Stewie (eventually) did as frosh.
Obviously it is different coaching philosophy --a question I asked beyond the one above: Why does Geno--bring some players along slowly and others much faster--DT, May, Rene--others. The only answer to that is --immediate need and talent. Had Danger been the Frosh point for the Rene team--Danger would have been leading that team by now--Geno would have needed her.
Now with Saniya and Kia--and Molly--Geno rolled the dice early on - and crapped out. Opting to fix Dangers defense and practice attitudes. Dangers physical issues compounded her trail or trial to lead this team. No one suspected that the monument known as Kia had feet of clay and would cause her problems.
So this brings us to today and the beginning of this years future---both Danger and Kia pose questions. Danger will get better--Kia may take longer.
 
The idea that Danger could have dribbled away from the defender is a stretch. If you look at the play, Danger had her back to the defender and was leaping and falling backwards, towards the defender to steal the ball. She would almost have had to reverse her momentum in midair to miraculously avoid being fouled. While it would have been nice to see her make the foul shots, the play itself was tremendous.

As for Mo, go back and take a look at some of the games late in her freshman season, including the NCAA tournament. Sometimes she played well, but on other occasions she came in for a few minutes, turned the ball over a couple times, shot a couple bricks and earned a seat on the bench for the remainder of the game.

In the championship game vs Louisville, Mo played 14 minutes, mostly at mop-up time. She had 3 pts, 3 assists, 2 to's, 2 fouls, 0 steals & 0 rb's.

Moriah and Danger are different types of guards. Moriah was all you say she was--and now among the greatest in the world.
In the ND games---Muffet targeted Moriah--as the Tulane coach targeted Danger
to be the easiest to turn over---it worked for both coaches. Freshmen are freshmen--even the greatest--
 
.-.
I was one myself. So very pleased to have proven wrong.
I was wrong that Moriah wasn't as great as i thought she was--but eventually proven right---I posted the greatness of Danger early this year---I hope my record prevails.
 
Its difficult to compare Slocum and Crystal Dangerfield just yet. Slocum has been handed the keys to PG position and averages 30 min per game and practices with the first team everyday.That experience has to do wonders for your confidence and comfort level particularly with her supporting cast. Crystal Dangerfield had an injury and usually plays with a lineup that varies every few minutes. It will just take a bit longer for her comfort level to settle in, particularly to get to a point where she is not thinking too much and playing instinctively.
Having watched Slocum play a couple times and knowing what Crystal Dangerfield can do with the ball including pinpoint passing, I'd rather have CD on the team as , IMO, she has more upside than Slocum.
Sometimes Geno may have to back off just a little with some players to ease their tension. In the Maryland game Maryland's coach told Slocum to go playground on Uconn. That seemed to inspire her and she proceeded to have a good second half, something that would not have happened if someone had gotten in her face and guarded her. Dangerfield seemed to play that way against Baylor. The freshmen on other teams don't have to go through what Uconn's freshmen go through and in the long run that is why Uconn players seem to reach their full potential. Geno pulls as much as he can out of them and I believe he will do the same with Dangerfield. Some players said they know what to expect before they come to Uconn but, when they actually start practicing, find it is a lot harder than they thought, especially mentally. Dangerfield thought she was prepared based on comments attributed to her.
 
I think a distinction needs to be made with respect to Maya and the others in this group when it comes to "hard-headedness" vs. "effort, drive, discipline, focus" or however you want to phrase it.

Maya was hard-headed. Still is to some extent, I'm sure; most of the great ones are. She famously decamped to Geno's office after the FF loss to Stanford her freshman year, where she announced an epiphany she'd had, that she "could not win the game all by herself." Which Geno had been trying to tell her. The others listed (DT, Stewie, Sveta, possibly Tina) also were hard-headed in their own way.

However,

When it comes to the issue of Crystal needing to ramp up the intensity, and give 100% on a consistent basis--at the UCONN WBB level that Geno expects--this is very much par for the course for players in their freshman year. Almost everyone that has stepped through the door has had their eyes opened to what it really means to sacrifice, perform and give the real 100% all the time, consistently. Particularly for many of the uber-talented, since they have been able to do so much at a lower level of intensity than Geno demands at the college level. It's a shock to the system. Geno & Co. push them to reveal what their true 100% really is. This is a process.

But this is where Maya set herself apart. To my knowledge, she came already equipped in this respect. (Possibly Kelly Faris as well.) She always always always gave her true 100%, for every minute, in every drill, in every moment, in every play, in every situation, from day 1. Not day 50, or day 100, or day 200, but day 1. I'm not saying that Maya didn't grow, didn't develop and didn't need coaching just as anyone else ever has. But her drive was singular, and it never wavered. Further, it pushed others to greater heights.

Edit: OK - I have to qualify what I just said ... :) there was one (and only one) time that I saw Maya's energy and effort at less than 100%. It was late in the streak-busting loss to Stanford. I remember distinctly a few moments where she was no longer hustling and busting her ass the way she normally did. It might not have been noticeable with mere mortals but with her, it definitely was. She showed she was human! The rest of the time at UCONN, she was in Geno's words, "like a Corporation."
Yes, to be historically accurate, Maya Moore--the player who never took a play off--did not chase down a Stanford player after a steal and may have been at less than full effort on a few others. It was so shocking to see. I know that both Geno and Tiffany had the flu, but UConn doesn't make excuses. My guess is that Maya also was under the weather, plus she was manhandled by the Ogwumike sisters. Maya's steal against DePaul or her late threes that almost caught Rutgers, both in her freshman year, were more typical of her play.
 
I think Crystal will be fine. Every freshman, with the possible exception of the great Maya Moore, who finished 2nd in the AP POY voting, had struggles as a freshman. Diana couldn't make a three in the Final Four against ND. Tina struggled with layups and FTs. Kaleena had a shooting slump and pouted. Stewie got pushed around, slumped, and was a nonfactor against Baylor. Moriah was out of control at times and shot the ball poorly.

Geno is certainly pushing Crystal hard, but he also clearly says that she has the potential to be great. We see her offensive moves and slick passes. I think she just needs to keep working hard, listening to the staff, and keeping her head up. I would also like to see her practice her FTs, as a response to the Tulane game. She was 2-6 and only 1-4 in crunch time. She's a better shooter than that shows, but she needs to put in more work and be confident.
 
Oldude, do you really think Geno's attitude is."give her a break, she's a freshmam ? "
No one is saying that Geno is looking to give her a break. We all know his approach ( which has worked in the vast majority of instances) and, if for some reason we don't , he made it abundantly clear in what he's said about Crystal's performance and it's "up and down" tendencies.
What's being said, is that many of us posting think it's fair to give her a break in that she's up against a difficult freshman year challenge, playing for a team continually in the spotlight, having to face and overcome injuries and having to live-up to a high standard of play-- as performed by the best team in the nation!
If Slocum, as a freshman, can overcome and stand-out...more power to her. Dangerfield, from all indications, has an outstanding UConn career ahead of her and may show further signs of it before this season ends!!
 
That may be true, but she played like an AA against Connecticut and if she'd gotten any help from SWK or anyone else(Kaila Charles was in foul trouble) that game may have ended differently. The tOSU game is an unfair comparison, because she spent the evening guarding Kelsey Mitchell not an easy task for any single player, not named Moriah Jefferson....
And Dangerfield played like an AA against Baylor. Sooo......???
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,336
Messages
4,565,465
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom