- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction Score
- 732
And you don’t think there’s correlation between this moment and the macrocosm of Hurley figuring “it” out ? I agree I think Hurley gave Andre every opportunity to prove his shooting development, but also Hurley then is not Hurley now. He has far more resources, carte Blanche and leeway to construct the team while having confidence in this approach. I think everything before this moment is predictive of Hurley learning from a philosophy that is not optimal for winning or positioning his players to be the best they can be.The thing with Andre was that Hurley told him to focus on 3 point shooting throughout his time here. He adjusted when it was accepted that wouldn’t be a thing and it hurt the team and then asked him to attack more and play closer to the rim. He should’ve asked him to do that from day 1 but didn’t for similar reasons we’re hearing about Ross dribble penetration, it wasn’t needed at the time. It was a very reactive instead of proactive way of developing him.
I don’t think focusing on overall player development and winning have to be mutually exclusive.
Totally agree there was some reactive decision making there but how could he not bc he wasn’t getting the results he did after the fact. It is in this way why he is not asking Ross to be a dribble drive creator/scorer. His bag is 3-D wing and that’s what will get him to the league and another championship, the rest is gravy.

