Stain whos on your list?
Not really. He should have been behind the 3-point line to close it out.Who said anything about bringing anyone in next year?
Team is awesome, 2 games over .500. Why would we change anything?
Loved the Wooden-esque move at the end to bring in the walk-on for the game winner... no one saw that one coming. Was brilliant
Sample set for games is still too small.What about tonight, Villanova, Wichita, Indiana, or Xavier makes you say Hurley is the right guy for the job?
It’s really hurtful when you call someone a coward in a message board over the internetWrong. Names of college basketball coaches, coward.
Be critical all you want of Hurley if you want, but why? When Calhoun came to UConn, Perno left him a future NBA All-Star and another guy drafted in the 1st round. Ollie left Hurley these two guys. This team is well-coached, it just has two recalcitrants with the ball in their hands all the time. His options are limited right now. This team reminds me of Scott Burrell's final year. He just chucked up brick after brick and there was nothing Calhoun could do.
And I understand his hesitancy to do so, but the time has come. In the words of Rare Earth, "I put my faith in the people, but the people let me down."There's nothing Hurley can do about it in our senior guards, other than playing different guys.
I've written before in this forum that, while I'm happy with the progress the team has made in intensity and defense on the court, and the recruiting has stepped up nicely, there is room for criticism of players/Hurley (apportion blame however you like) for the end of game ability to win the winnable, and in general the structure of the offense. Hurley can't shoot for the players, but he has to help them to create better shots, and to recognize what for them is a good shot, and what is a bad shot. (Insert your Vital iso drive fave here).Sample set for games is still too small.
Team is definitely more competitive, not getting blown out of the gym, recruiting classes have been strong, stop the bleeding on transfers, more engaged with the media, good story to tell for future classes with the move back to the BE given his background and east coast roots
No one here is calling for Hurley’s head. But that doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of the 10-8 season
I tend to agree with this. For chemistry reasons, Hurley can't sit CV and AG at the end of games, but also, in my opinion, we'd definitely lose anyway if he did. They may be an absolute disaster in crunch time, but I expect Gaffney and Badams would be even worse.I've written before in this forum that, while I'm happy with the progress the team has made in intensity and defense on the court, and the recruiting has stepped up nicely, there is room for criticism of players/Hurley (apportion blame however you like) for the end of game ability to win the winnable, and in general the structure of the offense. Hurley can't shoot for the players, but he has to help them to create better shots, and to recognize what for them is a good shot, and what is a bad shot. (Insert your Vital iso drive fave here).
So those on this forum who blindly are all in on Hurley should probably take a step back, support him and what he's doing, but continue to observe and see if those offensive and end of game flaws can be corrected. While it ain't all his fault, it also ain't all the players' fault. You all know that there are first and second year coaches who get their teams playing really solid ball on both ends quickly.
Step back my tookus. He's the guy for UConn. These late game "flaws" will be solved by attrition.So those on this forum who blindly are all in on Hurley should probably take a step back, support him and what he's doing, but continue to observe and see if those offensive and end of game flaws can be corrected.