Courant: UConn athletics deficit grows to $43.5 million | The Boneyard

Courant: UConn athletics deficit grows to $43.5 million

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,894
Reaction Score
22,555

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,403
Reaction Score
97,207
Unless you know exactly how they arrived at that number it's meaningless.

Even when you do have a path towards the final number, it's meaningless. From the article. It's a backwards looking number. Tells you where you were, not where you are, or where you are going.

According to an athletic department spokesperson, last year’s payment toward UConn’s $17 million AAC exit fee is not reflected in the financial statement, which accounts for the period between July 2019 and June 2020, nor are pandemic-related losses from this fall and winter. The financial statement also does not include $26.4 million in donations and pledges the athletic department secured in the 2020 fiscal year, the second-highest amount raised in athletics history.
 

UconnU

Demolish the XL center.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,582
Reaction Score
30,772
Not great, but I’d assume most schools lost more money (or made less) in 2020. Still though.
Most schools lose money on athletics in a normal year. In 2018-2019 there were only like 15 profitable athletic departments, and that was with ideal economic conditions. Even most SEC schools lose money. I think the entire pac-12 operates in the red.

With that said $44 million is a gigantic number. That’s not a number that is justifiable in any way.
 

XLCenterFan

CT, NE
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
3,532
Reaction Score
13,420
It shouldn’t be considered a loss. It should just be a cost. Public universities should provide those that attend the ability to play sports. Is what the school spends on research considered a loss? Is what they spend on the debate team or mock trial a loss? Is what they spend on music or arts a loss?
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
10,924
Reaction Score
28,873
It shouldn’t be considered a loss. It should just be a cost. Public universities should provide those that attend the ability to play sports. Is what the school spends on research considered a loss? Is what they spend on the debate team or mock trial a loss? Is what they spend on music or arts a loss?
Agreed to a certain extent but none of those throw a number close to $44million loss into the bottom line. It's relative yes but it's typical of a public entity; spend out of your arse, show losses and hope the government comes to the rescue. If any private or publicly traded business were run the way the US/state/local entities do very few of us would be employed. It's disgusting.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
Unless you know exactly how they arrived at that number it's meaningless.

I assure it is not meaningless. Anyone who thinks these AD numbers do anything other than hide the extent of the losses is fooling themselves. Admins are not worried about hiding the "profits" from the athletes. They are worried about hiding the extent of the losses from their biggest customers: parents.

Looking at the budget document, they are spending $33m for coaches and the AD staff. Oooof. Another $13m for recruiting, travel and games.
 

CL82

2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,511
Reaction Score
206,269
@ScottVib Thanks for the link. I'd love to go through the detail when I have more time.

The school pays about $36M in support of athletics (not counting student fees.) Then the AD pays about half that back to the school for tuition/room and board. So is it fair that to say that the school actually pay @$18M in support of athletics?

Here is one of the biggest takeaways:
1611242382665.png

If UConn is a part of a P5 conference deal they are making at least the the $36M (which is really $18M net) that they are pumping into supporting the AD.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
4,923
Reaction Score
19,063
Here is the biggest problem with the reporting.

UConn does not allocate $16.8 million in revenues to an individual sport even though the vast majority of these revenues come from football and basketball. Thus, the size of the "deficits" reported for individual sports are due to accounting, not reality.

Judge for yourself as these revenues are not allocated to any sport:

1) NCAA Distribution: $2.2 million

2) Conference distribution: $2.34 million

3) Royalties, licensing, advertising, sponsorships: $12.26 million

The women's basketball media rights with SNY ($1.15 million) is a separate line item so it is allocated to women's basketball. Men's basketball and football have no media rights revenues allocated to the sports.

Oh, and the report doesn't include $26.4 million of donations and pledges made to the athletic department in FY2020.

In addition there are transfer pricing issues (expenses) that you typically see in companies that can lead to bad decision making.

Look, the athletic department has financial issues, but don't use this report exclusively (and the Courant article) to evaluate the situation.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,134
Reaction Score
22,261
We should have spend some of that on a penetrating point guard
 

CL82

2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,511
Reaction Score
206,269
Looking at the budget document, they are spending $33m for coaches and the AD staff.
Of that number $10M is not allocated to any specific teams, i.e., it is AD office staff. That is in the upper half of P5 schools. That would seem to be a place for reductions.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,211
Reaction Score
1,565
I assure it is not meaningless. Anyone who thinks these AD numbers do anything other than hide the extent of the losses is fooling themselves. Admins are not worried about hiding the "profits" from the athletes. They are worried about hiding the extent of the losses from their biggest customers: parents.

Looking at the budget document, they are spending $33m for coaches and the AD staff. Oooof. Another $13m for recruiting, travel and games.
I smell the football program getting toasted. LOL
 

CL82

2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,511
Reaction Score
206,269
I smell the football program getting toasted. LOL
I don’t know about that, but I am worried about their getting annihilated.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
Most schools lose money on athletics in a normal year. In 2018-2019 there were only like 15 profitable athletic departments, and that was with ideal economic conditions. Even most SEC schools lose money. I think the entire pac-12 operates in the red.

With that said $44 million is a gigantic number. That’s not a number that is justifiable in any way.

I assure it is not meaningless. Anyone who thinks these AD numbers do anything other than hide the extent of the losses is fooling themselves. Admins are not worried about hiding the "profits" from the athletes. They are worried about hiding the extent of the losses from their biggest customers: parents.

Looking at the budget document, they are spending $33m for coaches and the AD staff. Oooof. Another $13m for recruiting, travel and games.

One of the biggest, if not the biggest reason so many athletics departments have losses has nothing to do with the administration.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,606
Reaction Score
3,168
Agreed to a certain extent but none of those throw a number close to $44million loss into the bottom line. It's relative yes but it's typical of a public entity; spend out of your arse, show losses and hope the government comes to the rescue. If any private or publicly traded business were run the way the US/state/local entities do very few of us would be employed. It's disgusting.
Private companies don’t run on a deficit? I believe many do and many take years to achieve profit if ever.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
2,858
Reaction Score
12,221
Private companies don’t run on a deficit? I believe many do and many take years to achieve profit if ever.
Don't bother with facts with gtcam. Fox News told him public = evil, private = good, and he's not inclined to let any nuanced truth get in the way of that.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,211
Reaction Score
1,565
your own university's football program is a laughing matter to you?

No, but unfortunately I do not think the football program is long for this world. aka "toast" Hope i'm wrong, but a lot of warning signs.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
924
Reaction Score
2,067
Spending time trying to dissect the numbers on the BY is a waste of time for everyone here.

The bigger concern is the millions of CT residents who don't know the facts but see a headline like this and immediately start saying "something needs to be done about this waste of TAX PAYER dollars".

When they start to make their voices heard which IMHO will be soon based on the budget mess in CT we will likely see more sports shutdown
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
Here is the biggest problem with the reporting.

UConn does not allocate $16.8 million in revenues to an individual sport even though the vast majority of these revenues come from football and basketball. Thus, the size of the "deficits" reported for individual sports are due to accounting, not reality.

Judge for yourself as these revenues are not allocated to any sport:

1) NCAA Distribution: $2.2 million

2) Conference distribution: $2.34 million

3) Royalties, licensing, advertising, sponsorships: $12.26 million

The women's basketball media rights with SNY ($1.15 million) is a separate line item so it is allocated to women's basketball. Men's basketball and football have no media rights revenues allocated to the sports.

Oh, and the report doesn't include $26.4 million of donations and pledges made to the athletic department in FY2020.

In addition there are transfer pricing issues (expenses) that you typically see in companies that can lead to bad decision making.

Look, the athletic department has financial issues, but don't use this report exclusively (and the Courant article) to evaluate the situation.

It did report donations.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
Spending time trying to dissect the numbers on the BY is a waste of time for everyone here.

The bigger concern is the millions of CT residents who don't know the facts but see a headline like this and immediately start saying "something needs to be done about this waste of TAX PAYER dollars".

When they start to make their voices heard which IMHO will be soon based on the budget mess in CT we will likely see more sports shutdown

The reason they have too many sports is for reasons that have nothing to do with the administration
 

CL82

2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,511
Reaction Score
206,269
Don't bother with facts with gtcam. Fox News told him public = evil, private = good, and he's not inclined to let any nuanced truth get in the way of that.
Take it to the McHugh.
 

mrl2016

better late than never
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
940
Reaction Score
1,855
Don't bother with facts with gtcam. Fox News told him public = evil, private = good, and he's not inclined to let any nuanced truth get in the way of that.
Private companies can run a deficit and be successful because they are growing market share or show tremendous promise in their future prospects of lowering costs and turning a profit

Doesn’t take a genius to realize this isn’t the case with UConn athletics
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
86,934
Reaction Score
323,077
It did report donations.

It included less than $1m in contributions but...

“The financial statement also does not include $26.4 million in donations and pledges the athletic department secured in the 2020 fiscal year, the second-highest amount raised in athletics history.”
 

Online statistics

Members online
563
Guests online
3,658
Total visitors
4,221

Forum statistics

Threads
155,769
Messages
4,030,918
Members
9,863
Latest member
leepaul


Top Bottom