Could Carl be talking about the Boneyard? | The Boneyard

Could Carl be talking about the Boneyard?

Status
Not open for further replies.
We have a mix here of people who've seen recruits play and people who haven't. Both groups take their cues from others who've seen the players in action.

And much of that opinion fodder comes through the media -- including from people who are quoted by, among others, Mr. Adamec.

And all fans are entitled to exchange their views and opinions, whether well informed or less so. The least we can do to repay Adamec for his fine reporting is to supply him with evident amusement.

And the most we can do, for him and his peers, all of whom take full advantage of it, is to serve as an army of news gatherers and a window on fan sentiment.

So the condescension is a bit of a nip to the hand that feeds. Thanks for the food, you vacuous blabberers.

But we love you, Carl. Keep the good articles coming. And we'll keep doing what we do.
 
I guess Carl has never offered an OPINION on anyone he's not seen play - ever.

C'mon, that's what sports wags do (and get paid for their speculation)!

I think Carl's tongue was in his cheek when he wrote that...is there something that can be injected into the BoneYard to increase humor and its appreciation?

 
I think he is right
He is. But we do the same to reporters........comment on them without actually having read their columns. :rolleyes:

Of course they've been known to form opinions of BYers without ever having met any. ;)
 
We have a mix here of people who've seen recruits play and people who haven't. Both groups take their cues from others who've seen the players in action.

And much of that opinion fodder comes through the media -- including from people who are quoted by, among others, Mr. Adamec.

And all fans are entitled to exchange their views and opinions, whether well informed or less so. The least we can do to repay Adamec for his fine reporting is supply him with evident amusement.

And the most we can do, for him and his peers, all of whom take full advantage of it, is to serve as an army of news gatherers and a window on fan sentiment.

So the condescension is a bit of a nip to the hand that feeds. Thanks for the food, you vacuous blabberers.

But we love you, Carl. Keep the good articles coming. And we'll keep doing what we do.


vacuous? But I just vacu'ed this morning!! :p
 
You mean posters here evaluate a player w/o ever having seen them play? Come on...

has anyone ever heard of YouTube ? it allows posters to evaluate a player without seeing them in person
 
has anyone ever heard of YouTube ? it allows posters to evaluate a player without seeing them in person

nope...what is "you tube"?

Just in case..

images
 
We have a mix here of people who've seen recruits play and people who haven't. Both groups take their cues from others who've seen the players in action.

And much of that opinion fodder comes through the media -- including from people who are quoted by, among others, Mr. Adamec.

And all fans are entitled to exchange their views and opinions, whether well informed or less so. The least we can do to repay Adamec for his fine reporting is supply him with evident amusement.

And the most we can do, for him and his peers, all of whom take full advantage of it, is to serve as an army of news gatherers and a window on fan sentiment.

So the condescension is a bit of a nip to the hand that feeds. Thanks for the food, you vacuous blabberers.

But we love you, Carl. Keep the good articles coming. And we'll keep doing what we do.

Many posters on the Yard have seen these high schoolers play way more often than anyone in The Horde.
 
I think Carl's tongue was in his cheek when he wrote that...is there something that can be injected into the BoneYard to increase humor and its appreciation?

We could mebbe all move to, like, Uruguay?
 
You tube is one of them teen-age fads, Oz. Like planking and coning and flash mobs.
 
I guess Carl has never offered an OPINION on anyone he's not seen play - ever.

C'mon, that's what sports wags do (and get paid for their speculation)!
Exactly. How many sportswriters have votes on college football and basketball and even baseball national polls who've never seen the team play or if so, they haven't seen them play during the previous week or weeks and yet they make judgement on their positions in the national polls. For instance, say Butler in preseason is expected to have a highly capable basketball team and they're undefeated (5-0) and they beat a big name school but it's only the 3rd week of the season. How do you vote them a specific number such as the "14th ranked team" in the country in your poll based on almost no information other than they haven't lost and they beat a big name school who you don't even know is any good at all. It's silly stuff but it happens often and why shouldn't we be entitled to be just as silly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
23
Guests online
1,203
Total visitors
1,226

Forum statistics

Threads
164,115
Messages
4,382,967
Members
10,185
Latest member
aacgoast


.
..
Top Bottom