Considering we got the Death penalty in 2013.... | The Boneyard

Considering we got the Death penalty in 2013....

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,351
Reaction Score
6,522
Please remember that UConn's APR citations and penalties were strictly voodoo perpetrated by Mark Emmert and the NCAA under increased public pressure. Conspiracy theorists will cite Emmert having been fired by UConn for being an historically negligent chancellor as a true indicator of revenge as motive. I find it hard to disagree.

There is no question that the men's APR and graduation rates were atrocious in the early 2000s. That the rules were changed mid stream to single out UConn, a program that had demonstrably improved in all academic areas, is not speculation. It is fact. Jim Calhoun didn't have a lot of friends to have his back either. He didn't manage academics well but that doesn't change the fact that we were the only school subject to a liquid rules process that helped get us the death penalty.

As for the semi death penalty of being relegated to the AAC, we can look no further than the exceedingly jealous and paranoid administration of Boston College and its former AD Gene DiFilippo. BCU bailed for the ACC in the midst of confidential strategy negotiations among Big East programs and an admittedly over zealous politico with higher aspirations in then Attorney General Dick Blumenthal sued BC (and Miami). BC, never without delusions of athletic grandeur, blocked UConn from joining the ACC in the second round of expansion to protect its laughingly unjustifiable self image as top dog in New England; status it never had and out of retribution toward the state of CT and the university for the lawsuit.

In hindsight. We made the wrong enemies.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,086
Reaction Score
52,785
He didn't manage academics well but that doesn't change the fact that we were the only school subject to a liquid rules process that helped get us the death penalty.
We did not get the "death penalty"
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,351
Reaction Score
6,522
We did not get the "death penalty"

You're right and I know better. It just seems like it right now. We did get the 20 kicks in the nads penalty though and it was still voodoo.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
4,156
Reaction Score
10,194
Stupid BC. they screwed uconn. But that 0-18 in the ACC last year was a lot of fun as we were winning the aacT at the same time. They won 7 games last year and....what, 9 this year and 2-16 in the acc with wins against two other lowly opponents. They suck. That is karma hitting them very hard. I know they sucked before that 0-18 season too.
 

Horatio

15 years no Madden
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
3,337
Reaction Score
12,633
The restrictions were a factor up until last year but this year is strictly about the injuries. We did have two grad. Transfer guys last year and that's a result of a scholarship reduction. I mean we should never get the point when need two Grade transfers. This season was supposed be our "restocking" of talent after the restrictions but the injuries came. It's crippling to have a lose of scholarships and then this many injuries.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,696
Reaction Score
11,734
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I've never understood how the "sanctions" have really hurt us that much from a player standpoint. The idea that we HAD to take two grad transfers is ridiculous. We chose to take them after we swung and missed on other recruits. We weren't hampered. KO and the staff made the decision not to take a flyer on someone who might transfer out ala the Robert Swain's, Rob Garrison's, Jamaal Trice's of yesteryear. If your belief is that we "under" stock our roster due to a fear of future APR issues in regards to transfers, then I guess your view is adequate. But even in our heyday, we never had a "full" roster. JC always took a flyer on a couple guys who you knew were there to be a practice player.

We have about 38 threads bashing KO as a coach but always saying that the guy can recruit. So how can it be both ways in regards to the lingering effects of 2013?
 

BUConn10

Artist formerly known as BUHusky10
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
4,067
Reaction Score
10,556
It was only a death penalty because of the timing. The sanctions came right when UConn needed to be its strongest and have its most positive PR.

Instead the sanctions collided with APR and Calhoun leaving creating the perfect storm that played a major role in us getting passed over during conference realignment's most volatile period where our chances were the best.

So in effect, the indirect result of the sanctions is what became the death penalty, not the sanctions themselves. Death by slow suffocation.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,218
Reaction Score
132,800
We got the purgatory sentence in 2014.
 

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
1,416
Total visitors
1,495

Forum statistics

Threads
158,960
Messages
4,175,575
Members
10,047
Latest member
Dixiedog


.
Top Bottom