How does everyone feel about the outlook for our RPI this coming season? SOS (based on last year's KenPom ratings which is admittedly an imperfect metric but I don't have much of a barometer otherwise for teams below 100 or so) is really all over the map.. while the categorization is somewhat arbitrary (Temple vs. UCF/USF, but I am going a bit on pedigree here also), I think it goes to show that we'll easily have >10 high quality match-ups, but probably a similar degree of rather weak caliber opposition.. if Tulsa remains solid against upgraded competition, that could be a nice addition the quality bucket:
Quality (at least 10, as many as 14)
AAC: 2x probably-weaker Cinci (23), 2x upgraded SMU (30), 2x Memphis (37)
Non-Conf: Florida (3), Duke (13), Stanford (36) though I would think takes a step back this year, Texas (39)
TBD: likely a diminished Dayton (38) although the alternative Texas A&M (121) will supposedly be much improved, ideally either New Mexico (31) or WVU (68), and then hopefully two reasonably strong games in AAC semis/finals.
Clunkers (12)
AAC: UCF (164), 2x USF (186), 2x ECU (242), 2x Tulane (282)
Non-Conf: Bryant (194), Charleston (206), Coppin St (290), Central Conn (295)
TBD: opening-round of AAC tourney (if we finish 1, 2 or 3, would be playing 6/7/8 seed in quarters)
Somewhere in-between (5): 2x Tulsa (73), Columbia (123), Houston (125), Yale (144), 2x Temple (159)