- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 226
- Reaction Score
- 946
I preface this post by stating the obvious, which is that UConn will likely accept the first option alternative to the AAC that comes its way - I think we all can easily agree on that.
However, I have the opportunity to meet with some of the members of the UConn Foundation leadership, as well as the Administration leadership from time to time and I think there has certainly been a change in direction/focus as it pertains to CR. I don't consider myself an "insider" or privy to any special information, but I have some good relationships that are long standing and I believe that when I discuss these matters (largely in a fundraising capacity) that I get the straight information.
The administration and the Foundation are keenly aware of the importance of athletics and conference to the overall health and future growth of the institution and the Foundation - certainly SH and the new Foundation President Josh Newton understand this implicitly. They also understand that while success in hoops is wonderful, and was just what we needed in 2013, it is not what will get us where we want or need to go.
In discussion about CR 6 months to a year ago, the conversation was hopeful and the hope was centered around how we might be able to gain an invite to the ACC. However, more recently, the discussion seems to have shifted to B1G. I have no idea whether this is wishful thinking, based on careful analysis, conversations with other school Presidents or what - but the shift is clear. When I have these discussions now (about the importance of football or a better conference) the answers are certainly more B1G focused. They are focused around our odds of AAU admittance or how we are trying to grow Uconn in the model of the big publics likes Michigan, etc. This is too obvious to be coincidental and while it ain't much and it ain't new - it's just something I've observed, and something that keeps me hopeful.
However, I have the opportunity to meet with some of the members of the UConn Foundation leadership, as well as the Administration leadership from time to time and I think there has certainly been a change in direction/focus as it pertains to CR. I don't consider myself an "insider" or privy to any special information, but I have some good relationships that are long standing and I believe that when I discuss these matters (largely in a fundraising capacity) that I get the straight information.
The administration and the Foundation are keenly aware of the importance of athletics and conference to the overall health and future growth of the institution and the Foundation - certainly SH and the new Foundation President Josh Newton understand this implicitly. They also understand that while success in hoops is wonderful, and was just what we needed in 2013, it is not what will get us where we want or need to go.
In discussion about CR 6 months to a year ago, the conversation was hopeful and the hope was centered around how we might be able to gain an invite to the ACC. However, more recently, the discussion seems to have shifted to B1G. I have no idea whether this is wishful thinking, based on careful analysis, conversations with other school Presidents or what - but the shift is clear. When I have these discussions now (about the importance of football or a better conference) the answers are certainly more B1G focused. They are focused around our odds of AAU admittance or how we are trying to grow Uconn in the model of the big publics likes Michigan, etc. This is too obvious to be coincidental and while it ain't much and it ain't new - it's just something I've observed, and something that keeps me hopeful.