Conference Networks aren't guaranteed to work | The Boneyard

Conference Networks aren't guaranteed to work

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Pac-12 owns it outright and they didn't get $2 million a team....

In case you were wondering if the Dude's projections were based anywhere in reality....
 
Their network worked, but only to the tune of 25% of projected income. At least they didn't lose money (imagine a smiley emoji here).
 
lne001 said:
Their network worked, but only to the tune of 25% of projected income. At least they didn't lose money (imagine a smiley emoji here).
Expand ...

And if you could just sell the games for more than that... did it still 'work'?
 
.-.
whaler11 said:
And if you could just sell the games for more than that... did it still 'work'?
Expand ...

The only games shown on their network will be the ones they can't sell. At least that seems to be what the B1G is doing
 
lne001 said:
The only games shown on their network will be the ones they can't sell. At least that seems to be what the B1G is doing
Expand ...

The Big Ten teams could certainly sell a lot of those games. There are a ton of Big Ten and Pac 12 football games on those networks nevermind the huge quantity of basketball both show.

There were Pac 12 tourney games on the Pac 12 network.

The Pac 12 network is an abject failure - and this is not the time to be trying to sell yet another TV network as carriers bleed subscribers.

You better have a strong partner and the LHN shows even with an ESPN there are no guarantees.
 
Failure is relative - the Pac12 Network operates in the black and returns about as much as we receive from ESPN for the whole shebang. And it's money for programming that otherwise would not be aired and would not be generating any revenue at all.

It might be mismanaged, though. They've only managed to get in front of 12M people and they continue to fail to sign a deal with DirecTV.

It'd seem that they lack the muscle of the network-backed models of the SEC and Big Ten. Although the they claim to prefer owning 100% of the network, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold off half.
 
Fishy said:
Failure is relative - the Pac12 Network operates in the black and returns about as much as we receive from ESPN for the whole shebang. And it's money for programming that otherwise would not be aired and would not be generating any revenue at all.

It might be mismanaged, though. They've only managed to get in front of 12M people and they continue to fail to sign a deal with DirecTV.

It'd seem that they lack the muscle of the network-backed models of the SEC and Big Ten. Although the they claim to prefer owning 100% of the network, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold off half.
Expand ...

These games wouldn't be televised?
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    142.3 KB · Views: 66
whaler11 said:
These games wouldn't be televised?
Expand ...

There's a couple good ones there but dang I see a lot of Washington St... And yes I know they're decent, but nobody cares about them. At least with Mike Leach though, they're entertaining.
 
.-.
MattMang23 said:
There's a couple good ones there but dang I see a lot of Washington St... And yes I know they're decent, but nobody cares about them. At least with Mike Leach though, they're entertaining.
Expand ...

There are others. UConn was able to sell mediocre football games to SNY... Utah, Arizona, Arizona State, Washingon, Oregon and Stanford couldn't sell games to RSNs?

Sure Washington State might not squeeze 1.9 million out of their PAC12Net games but really everyone else could monetize those games at a better price.

Nobody wants another fringe/niche sports network. If the ACC/Big12/Pac12 want to make any headway they need another path.
 
whaler11 said:
There are others. UConn was able to sell mediocre football games to SNY... Utah, Arizona, Arizona State, Washingon, Oregon and Stanford couldn't sell games to RSNs?

Sure Washington State might not squeeze 1.9 million out of their PAC12Net games but really everyone else could monetize those games at a better price.

Nobody wants another fringe/niche sports network. If the ACC/Big12/Pac12 want to make any headway they need another path.
Expand ...

No, totally agree those games could sell. Washington State or not- because the opponents are draws. I just personally would not be very excited to turn on the P12N to see Cougar football all the time. It appears to be the home of WSU athletics.
 
MattMang23 said:
No, totally agree those games could sell. Washington State or not- because the opponents are draws. I just personally would not be very excited to turn on the P12N to see Cougar football all the time. It appears to be the home of WSU athletics.
Expand ...

I'm pretty sure people with SNY in other places weren't dying to see UConn play an FCS or MAC team but the checks didn't bounce.

But you make a good point why the SEC and Big Ten are the only viable networks. They have teams people in other geographies want to watch.
 
Last edited:
whaler11 said:
The Pac-12 owns it outright and they didn't get $2 million a team....

In case you were wondering if the Dude's projections were based anywhere in reality....
Expand ...

"The Cougars also took in significantly less in Pac-12 Networks distribution revenue — $1.4 million – than they had hoped. WSU originally had projected the Pac-12 Networks’ distribution revenue at around $5 million or $6 million per school."

After a number of reads, I think WSU received somewhere between $3.6 and $4.6MM from the network. Really cumbersome.
 
FAIRTIDES said:
"The Cougars also took in significantly less in Pac-12 Networks distribution revenue — $1.4 million – than they had hoped. WSU originally had projected the Pac-12 Networks’ distribution revenue at around $5 million or $6 million per school."

After a number of reads, I think WSU received somewhere between $3.6 and $4.6MM from the network. Really cumbersome.
Expand ...

I think this confirms it's only 1.4 million. Which after further reflection is ridiculously low.

http://m.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2015/11/30/In-Depth/Pac12.aspx?
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,680
Messages
4,534,713
Members
10,408
Latest member
Bigo-Nel


Top Bottom