OT: - College Entrance Exam Cheating Scandal | Page 2 | The Boneyard

OT: College Entrance Exam Cheating Scandal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huh? The students are getting a free education! That seems to be lost on everyone who claims these students deserve a slice Of the pie. The free education is the bargain they agree to. Think about ANY company you work for, some products make lots of money and some products barely break even but the accountants in all divisions get paid the same. The NCAA is not a socialistic entity to reward students on contributions.
Totally agree, Defense. The college athletes are getting an early lesson in Marxian economics: the surplus labor value always goes to the capitalist/university! ;)
 
This is about how the 1% manipulates the system to demonstrate that their wealth allows them to cut the line...any line.

In China, my old friend Chris Balding noted that no one pays attention to lines and everything is quite lawless.

This is a sophisticated version of that phenomenon.

As an aside, driving East on I-80 today, refueling in a truck stop near Joliet IL, wandered into a huge argument about a blocked parking space.

Luckily, it calmed down by itself, but I was perfectly prepared for one or both parties to pull out guns and have at it.

Great country we live in.
 
I am not surprised that one of the people involved in the fiasco at USC, is Donna Heinel. Good riddance with her and her BS hiring of Cynthia Cooper Dyke, and then not letting her go as players were out of hand and suspended or quit the team. What a waste of 4 years.
Lock her up!!
 
This is about how the 1% manipulates the system to demonstrate that their wealth allows them to cut the line...any line.

In China, my old friend Chris Balding noted that no one pays attention to lines and everything is quite lawless.

This is a sophisticated version of that phenomenon.

As an aside, driving East on I-80 today, refueling in a truck stop near Joliet IL, wandered into a huge argument about a blocked parking space.

Luckily, it calmed down by itself, but I was perfectly prepared for one or both parties to pull out guns and have at it.

Great country we live in.

Feel free to leave.
 
I am not surprised that one of the people involved in the fiasco at USC, is Donna Heinel. Good riddance with her and her BS hiring of Cynthia Cooper Dyke, and then not letting her go as players were out of hand and suspended or quit the team. What a waste of 4 years.
Lock her up!!
Can some of our west coast fans please enlighten me. Is USC that hard of a school to get into compared to some of the other schools involved in this scandal?
 
A truly disgusting story with the real victims being the honest, hard working students who were denied admission.
A Yale women’s soccer coach did take a bribe but I don’t believe anyone is implying there was institution wide fraud at Yale or other schools involved in this scandal.
Winlots - your comment implies some wrongdoing by Yale in the past. What are you referring to?

I think the even bigger victims are the under qualified offspring of the wealthy parents in question. Imagine how humiliating it must be for them to discover just how many strings their parents pulled to get them admitted to schools they otherwise had no chance of attending. Even if the kids were in on the ruse, they’re 18 year-olds and have probably been subjected to years of pressure to excel. It reminds me, even more powerfully, that the young ladies who play basketball for UConn, and every other Division I school, are equally young and (perhaps) equally impressionable. Talented, yes, but YOUNG! As for the offspring of Lori Loughlin, Felicity Huffman, et al., I hope they can move on from this very public mortification.
 
.-.
As for the offspring of Lori Loughlin, Felicity Huffman, et al., I hope they can move on from this very public mortification.

Many, including Loughlin's kids, actively participated in the farces i n the indictments and complaints. Your knee jerk reaction is so typical. Read before you decide to become indignant crusader.
 
Many, including Loughlin's kids, actively participated in the farces i n the indictments and complaints. Your knee jerk reaction is so typical. Read before you decide to become indignant crusader.

Thanks for the hostility, with a side helping of condescension. You also missed my point. These are kids we’re talking about, and whether or not they actively participated in the farce, you and I have no idea what sort of pressure they were under. There aren’t many kids out there who can take that kind of stand against their parents, particularly when the parents in question are rich, manipulative and extremely ambitious, as well as amoral. But hey, maybe you’re better than the rest of us.
 
Thanks for the hostility, with a side helping of condescension. You also missed my point. These are kids we’re talking about, and whether or not they actively participated in the farce, you and I have no idea what sort of pressure they were under. There aren’t many kids out there who can take that kind of stand against their parents, particularly when the parents in question are rich, manipulative and extremely ambitious, as well as amoral. But hey, maybe you’re better than the rest of us.

Obviously, you still need what you got. And yes, to your last point, many have to get a grip on what is real. I did not miss your speculative point at all. There are consequences for participating in fraud, whether you knuckled under to your paents or were delighted to have them buy you a spot that should have gone to someone else. I do know I'm thinking straight. You can try ridicule. I'll take facts.
 
Can some of our west coast fans please enlighten me. Is USC that hard of a school to get into compared to some of the other schools involved in this scandal?
USC admitted 13% of the 64k+ students who applied last year, so I suppose it's "hard" in the sense that it's statistically unlikely. Stanford's admissions rate was about 4.5% (and from a presumably more competitive pool), but in a sense any applicant's odds are pretty low at both schools.
 
Huh? The students are getting a free education! That seems to be lost on everyone who claims these students deserve a slice Of the pie. The free education is the bargain they agree to. Think about ANY company you work for, some products make lots of money and some products barely break even but the accountants in all divisions get paid the same. The NCAA is not a socialistic entity to reward students on contributions.
Exactly, therefore they should be able to take their talents to the highest bidder for as much as they can get!
 
.-.
Last edited:
She's an influencer!!!! Laughed my ass off. Mom's going to the slammer and she doesn't care about school.

LINK
 
I think the even bigger victims are the under qualified offspring of the wealthy parents in question. Imagine how humiliating it must be for them to discover just how many strings their parents pulled to get them admitted to schools they otherwise had no chance of attending. Even if the kids were in on the ruse, they’re 18 year-olds and have probably been subjected to years of pressure to excel. It reminds me, even more powerfully, that the young ladies who play basketball for UConn, and every other Division I school, are equally young and (perhaps) equally impressionable. Talented, yes, but YOUNG! As for the offspring of Lori Loughlin, Felicity Huffman, et al., I hope they can move on from this very public mortification.
I find it very hard to feel sorry for the "children' of these wealthy and entitled people. These kids have had a sweet life, probably always getting more than they "deserved'. And while they are young adults, they are adults. You would have to know that you never played a sport before you got an acceptance letter for a athletic scholarship. Their parents may well have done them a disservice by this constant interference in their lives, but the kids have certainly reaped benefit from it. Privileged people always think they have earned their status, while underprivileged kids are taught that they deserve their lot in life because they are somehow responsible for their lack of advantage and opportunity. This apologist twist reminds me of the kid in Texas who killed four innocent people in a drunken, drugged accident wherein the judge declared him to be not guilty because he suffered from affluenza. I hope this post was written in facetious jest and I was just too unwitting to comprehend the joke. I wish no ill on anyone, but those who court ill gotten gain must surely reap their just deserts. And this goes fro the students and their parents alike. :confused:
 
Just curious, how does one qualify for a "Sailing Scholarship" at Stanford or for any school that has a college program. Looking at the rosters on the Stanford site, nearly every student went to a private school during HS(A few went to public highs in Newport Harbor and Costa Mesa areas of OC)
By the way if any of you New Englanders care, the Finals for sailing are around Memorial Day weekend in Newport RI. Does the Tree make the trip to RI?
 
Just curious, how does one qualify for a "Sailing Scholarship" at Stanford or for any school that has a college program. Looking at the rosters on the Stanford site, nearly every student went to a private school during HS(A few went to public highs in Newport Harbor and Costa Mesa areas of OC)
By the way if any of you New Englanders care, the Finals for sailing are around Memorial Day weekend in Newport RI. Does the Tree make the trip to RI?

This is the trick - they aren't trying to qualify for an athletic scholarship, and they wouldn't have. According to the U$C sailing team's website, the College Sailing rules don't permit schools to give out athletics scholarships. So those recruits were not being recruited for a scholarship, just for a place on the team. So when the coach communicated with the admissions office, he was effectively saying, "yeah, I can attest that this applicant is legit at sailing, and see, we're recruiting them, so you should give them extra bonus points for being a top sailor." This is really no different than the way the admissions office gives extra bonus points if you played the Violin at Carnegie Hall as a junior in high school. It's just that it's so hard to verify the resume credentials of 60,000 applicants that the athletic coaches serve as important conduits to verify whose athletic accomplishments actually merit special notice.

In terms of the scam in question, the trick is that once you're admitted, the university can't require you to follow through on your stated intention to play the sport. All they can do is take you athletic scholarship away from you if you quit or never join the team in the first place. But, oh yeah, these rich kids don't care, cause they never had any intention of qualifying for one, and Sailing doesn't offer them, and all they wanted was the large envelope. This is one of the reasons why people argue that some of these more tony sports are backdoors to allow rich kids to "qualify" for elite schools by "excelling" at sports that are so expensive/hard to access that few people can ever get good at them. It's something of a racket.

OTOH, when those sports dole out Olympic medals and world championships, it's hard to argue against colleges wanting to field teams. Most of the US water polo team gets trained as college students at one of Cal, Stanford, UCLA or USC. Almost all of our top swimmers either attend swimming universities as scholarship players or else go pro but still train with them (for example, this is what Katie Ledecky did - she stayed amateur for her freshman and sophomore years, and has now gone pro to prep for the 2020 olympics while continuing to train with her former college teammates at Stanford).
 
.-.
USC admitted 13% of the 64k+ students who applied last year, so I suppose it's "hard" in the sense that it's statistically unlikely. Stanford's admissions rate was about 4.5% (and from a presumably more competitive pool), but in a sense any applicant's odds are pretty low at both schools.

I imagine that this has always been the case at Stanford (but not USC, which has made a concerted effort since the 90s at least to boost its academic image, providing scholarships based solely on "merit"--e.g. SAT scores, and so on). However, 64K is a low bar these days regarding family income and the real scandal imo is the way in which entrance to college (or the best colleges, anyway) has become increasingly linked to wealth--and a great deal of it. (I probably should add that a daughter of mine attended Penn and another studied music at USC--both during the 90s.)

According to the 2017 article I linked above, at both Yale and Princeton students in the incoming freshman class whose family income ranked in the top 1% nationally outnumbered all other entering students. And at Harvard, 40% of the entering freshmen were "legacies." Maybe all of these students were deserving and belonged in the very select group of applicants who were admitted, but it's difficult to believe that there weren't many other equally (or more) deserving applicants whose families were considerably less wealthy and/or hadn't had a member who attended the institution previously. I don't see how this can be good news no matter how it's explained, and I frankly don't think it's going to get better.
 
Last edited:
Huh? The students are getting a free education! That seems to be lost on everyone who claims these students deserve a slice Of the pie. The free education is the bargain they agree to. Think about ANY company you work for, some products make lots of money and some products barely break even but the accountants in all divisions get paid the same. The NCAA is not a socialistic entity to reward students on contributions.
As VCTW's comparison shows, you get what you pay for with a free college education. Couldn't they get at least apprentice pay?
 
A couple of things. OJ2 (Olivia Jade) had deals with Sephora, Amazon, HP, Dolce Gabbana, etc. In addition, she has millions of followers on social media. That's super impressive for a high school senior and would have looked amazing on an application. How dumb must she be to have had to have her parents buy her admission. Even still, those achievements are education. She graduated from the very tony all girls Marymount HS. I honestly think she might have been accepted on her own merits. Since she has as much as said she never wanted to go to college, think of how wonderful it would have been if she really did get in on her own. But her parents were unwilling to take that chance.

And it seems that the now fired associate Athletic AD created situations where the applicants were asked to be considered as preferred walk-ons. If anyone questioned their status, they were to respond that they were going to be trying out for the team, nothing more. Nonetheless, wouldn't a coach be aware of someone like that if they were being considered for a team? Mark Trakh has not be named in any documents but I'm still suspicious.

This is what Heinel did when she tried to get a casino exec's daughter admitted as a basketball player: Heinel was also allegedly bribed to represent the daughter of Gamel Abdelaziz as a recruited basketball player. The daughter was given falsified basketball credentials like “Asia Pacific Activities Conference All Star Team,” “2016 China Cup Champions,” and “Hong Kong Academy team MVP.” Heinel represented the daughter to the admissions committee using the fraudulent athlete profile and obtained permission to admit her as a basketball recruit. Heinel advised that Abdelaziz send $200,000 to the gift account for the Galen Center, the arena for USC’s basketball and volleyball programs. This would be redirected to Heinel. Abdelaziz wired a $300,000 payment to KWF, which the co-operating witness told him would be marked as a donation to help “underserved kids.” The daughter was admitted. Abdelaziz was instructed to corroborate Heinel’s story that his daughter suffered an injury, which explained why she wasn’t playing basketball at USC.

https://deadspin.com/these-are-the-college-coaches-accused-of-turning-rich-k-1833238779
 
Last edited:
A couple of things. OJ2 (Olivia Jade) had deals with Sephora, Amazon, HP, Dolce Gabbana, etc. In addition, she has millions of followers on social media. That's super impressive for a high school senior and would have looked amazing on an application.

Call me super, super old-fashioned, but I work in higher education, and I do not find a celebrity daughter of two celebrity parents having a lot of social media followers and endorsement deals to be an impressive academic accomplishment worthy of admission. In fact, I don't find anyone, celebrity offspring or not, having a bevy of social media followers to be impressive. It's one thing to get elected as student body president, which certainly requires some popularity and social skills, but the accomplishment is only important and potentially worthy of your application file because you served as a leader for your school. Again, I may be a curmudgeon, but social media influencer is a bit like getting elected prom queen - everyone thinks you're pretty and cool, but no one thinks that's going to get you into Harvard, because all you do is stand there and look pretty, and--in the case of social media influencer--hawk random doodads for Amazon.
 
Call me super, super old-fashioned, but I work in higher education, and I do not find a celebrity daughter of two celebrity parents having a lot of social media followers and endorsement deals to be an impressive academic accomplishment worthy of admission.


A couple of things. OJ2 (Olivia Jade) had deals with Sephora, Amazon, HP, Dolce Gabbana, etc. I
I'm trying my best to keep up here so please forgive or try and answer my questions. I don't understand this "social influencer" so this is my guess: Jade was hawking products from Sephora, Amazon, HP, Dolce Gabbana to her millions of followers on social media. Presumably in exchange for some compensation? If so how much? If the compensation was significant enough why would these kids even need to go to college?
Put another way, how does a social influencing business model benefit from a college degree?
 
Call me super, super old-fashioned, but I work in higher education, and I do not find a celebrity daughter of two celebrity parents having a lot of social media followers and endorsement deals to be an impressive academic accomplishment worthy of admission. In fact, I don't find anyone, celebrity offspring or not, having a bevy of social media followers to be impressive. It's one thing to get elected as student body president, which certainly requires some popularity and social skills, but the accomplishment is only important and potentially worthy of your application file because you served as a leader for your school. Again, I may be a curmudgeon, but social media influencer is a bit like getting elected prom queen - everyone thinks you're pretty and cool, but no one thinks that's going to get you into Harvard, because all you do is stand there and look pretty, and--in the case of social media influencer--hawk random doodads for Amazon.

USC milked Lori and her husband for all it was worth. Lots and lots of publicity photos. USC also was at the forefront of OJ2's Instagram account of her going to college. That was free publicity and a lot of it. Similarly, a media influencer really doesn't seem a whole lot different than being elected student body president. It's a popularity contest. And schools have always been talking about having students who are well rounded and successful in other ventures and no question OJ2 is very successful in what she's done. That's accomplishment and it is impressive. She also attended a top private high school. Stand there and look pretty? Brooke Shields got into Princeton.

And just so we know where everything stands in this situation, USC is on break and OJ2 was on a yacht in the Baja,as with the Chairman of USC's BOD Rick Caruso and his family when the story broke..
 
.-.
Just curious, how does one qualify for a "Sailing Scholarship" at Stanford or for any school that has a college program. Looking at the rosters on the Stanford site, nearly every student went to a private school during HS(A few went to public highs in Newport Harbor and Costa Mesa areas of OC)
By the way if any of you New Englanders care, the Finals for sailing are around Memorial Day weekend in Newport RI. Does the Tree make the trip to RI?
Here's part of the USC incoming class:

pirates-of-the-caribbean.png
 
This is about how the 1% manipulates the system to demonstrate that their wealth allows them to cut the line...any line.
In China, my old friend Chris Balding noted that no one pays attention to lines and everything is quite lawless.
This is a sophisticated version of that phenomenon.
As an aside, driving East on I-80 today, refueling in a truck stop near Joliet IL, wandered into a huge argument about a blocked parking space.
Luckily, it calmed down by itself, but I was perfectly prepared for one or both parties to pull out guns and have at it.
Great country we live in.

This is an AMAZING country with some daft people. I'm sure all the other countries you would prefer to live in have no problems whatsoever.
 
I find it very hard to feel sorry for the "children' of these wealthy and entitled people. These kids have had a sweet life, probably always getting more than they "deserved'. And while they are young adults, they are adults. You would have to know that you never played a sport before you got an acceptance letter for a athletic scholarship. Their parents may well have done them a disservice by this constant interference in their lives, but the kids have certainly reaped benefit from it. Privileged people always think they have earned their status, while underprivileged kids are taught that they deserve their lot in life because they are somehow responsible for their lack of advantage and opportunity. This apologist twist reminds me of the kid in Texas who killed four innocent people in a drunken, drugged accident wherein the judge declared him to be not guilty because he suffered from affluenza. I hope this post was written in facetious jest and I was just too unwitting to comprehend the joke. I wish no ill on anyone, but those who court ill gotten gain must surely reap their just deserts. And this goes fro the students and their parents alike. :confused:

The post was not written in jest, FYI. According to a piece in the New York Daily News, many of the kids had no idea about their parents’ machinations. I also think it’s a bit of a stretch to bring up the Couch family (the “affluenza” clan) in this context. None of these kids, or their parents, has been accused of killing anyone. Keep in mind that the students were most likely minors when the alleged payoffs occurred. I’m not absolving them of all guilt, but I think public humiliation is more than ample punishment for them, if not for their grasping, amoral, entitled parents. All I can say is that it would have been extraordinarily difficult for me, as a 17 year-old, to stand up to my parents had they chosen to involve me in such a scheme. But maybe that’s just me. Unfortunately, we don’t get to pick our parents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,983
Messages
4,548,261
Members
10,431
Latest member
TeganK


Top Bottom