College Basketball's Most Talented Teams Ranked per barttorvik.com

[444JR]

Good guys #1

 

[444JR]

T-Rank - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats - T-Rank

T-Rank College Basketball Ratings and Rankings. And fun.

barttorvik.com

 

[auror]

T-Rank - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats - T-Rank

T-Rank College Basketball Ratings and Rankings. And fun.

barttorvik.com

Specifically

Verifying Browser...

 

[Mister P]

Good guys #1

Somethings not right with the Barttorvik ratings.
Alabama and Iowa St aren’t mentioned while Texas A&M is listed twice.

Edit
I guess CBKReport just listed it wrong from Barttorvik ?

 

[HooperScooper]

"I think they come back to the pack. Not a great roster." Lol at that coach. I wish we knew who said that.

Candid Coaches: Will UConn at least make a third straight Final Four this season?

The Huskies are looking to win the NCAA Tournament for the third consecutive season, but it won't be easy

www.cbssports.com

 

[auror]

Somethings not right with the Barttorvik ratings.
Alabama and Iowa St aren’t mentioned while Texas A&M is listed twice.

Edit
I guess CBKReport just listed it wrong from Barttorvik ?

It's specifically the "Talent" rating on the 2025 projections.

It's based on high school recruiting rank, and I'm pretty sure adjusted for age/class. So we're number 1 because we have a ton of top 80 kids who are no longer freshmen, several of whom (Diarra, Johnson) are seniors or juniors (Reed, Karaban).

 

[bendm]

It's specifically the "Talent" rating on the 2025 projections.

It's based on high school recruiting rank, and I'm pretty sure adjusted for age/class. So we're number 1 because we have a ton of top 80 kids who are no longer freshmen, several of whom (Diarra, Johnson) are seniors or juniors (Reed, Karaban).

Sooo in other words it’s meaningless?

 

[Mister P]

It's specifically the "Talent" rating on the 2025 projections.

It's based on high school recruiting rank, and I'm pretty sure adjusted for age/class. So we're number 1 because we have a ton of top 80 kids who are no longer freshmen, several of whom (Diarra, Johnson) are seniors or juniors (Reed, Karaban).

Thanks for clarifying this.
That explains some teams with strange rankings.

 

[auror]

Sooo in other words it’s meaningless?

Correct. That's why we're 1st in this metric and 13th overall in his projections.

 

[MJ1]

9 Big East teams in top 50, I’ll take that. Hopefully they all perform close to their ranking. Georgetown 13 really?

 

[auror]

9 Big East teams in top 50, I’ll take that. Hopefully they all perform close to their ranking. Georgetown 13 really?

Micah Peavy was surprisingly highly ranked as a recruit and is a 5th year now. Epps top 75 will be a junior. Curtis Williams, Sorber, Mulready all top 80 underclassmen. Fielder a 4*.

A lot of teams have 0* mid major uptransfers but GTown has some pedigree transfers that were mid to bad.

 

[REB1094]

Indiana is pretty close this time..

 

[HuskyHawk]

It's specifically the "Talent" rating on the 2025 projections.

It's based on high school recruiting rank, and I'm pretty sure adjusted for age/class. So we're number 1 because we have a ton of top 80 kids who are no longer freshmen, several of whom (Diarra, Johnson) are seniors or juniors (Reed, Karaban).

Well that makes it pretty useless then. So Tyler Kolek last year wouldn't show up as "talented" despite being drafted? Nice for visibility to be #1 but it doesn't mean anything.

 

[husky429]

It's specifically the "Talent" rating on the 2025 projections.

It's based on high school recruiting rank, and I'm pretty sure adjusted for age/class. So we're number 1 because we have a ton of top 80 kids who are no longer freshmen, several of whom (Diarra, Johnson) are seniors or juniors (Reed, Karaban).

That's super weird. A 3* kids who improves and averages 20ppg as a junior wouldn't be considered talented his senior year?

 

[auror]

It's not a good metric, no. I don't think it's even used in his projections. It's just for context or color.