- Joined
- Jan 13, 2014
- Messages
- 9,877
- Reaction Score
- 29,420
su·per·starSo where is the delineation between superstar.... big star. star... and just really good player ?
ˈso͞opərˌstär/
noun
- a high-profile and extremely successful performer or athlete.

su·per·starSo where is the delineation between superstar.... big star. star... and just really good player ?

Perception-Reality!! Fans usually think the other guys are getting all the calls. Go back 10 years ago and Geno spoke often and loudly that there was a bias against his team by refs, especially when the "bright lights are on". I believe that for the past 20 or so years people have spoken of the "preferential" treatment Star players got from the refs. I even perceived that DT got more favorable calls--but ask any Ref/change that to ask most Refs and they shall all say "we call all games without bias"--I've asked them.Although it can be - both ways, for and against - I think getting the calls often goes to the perceived better player(s). To the extent that UConn (in general) "gets" or is perceived as getting certain calls, well, it is partly a reputation for not fouling combined with highly thought of skill players that the ref is going to expect to be able to make "that move" without walking, even if they actually did that one time. Conversely, some refs (and no where near the number that some fans claimed) would over penalize Rutgers because they would perceive that Rutgers was physical and playing on the edge. For example, refs like DeMayo, Kantner, etc. did not fall in that trap, but good old Titus, some much lesser known guys, and Wesley Dean all tended to "over-compensate", based on an attempt at an honest analysis.
su·per·starSom
ˈso͞opərˌstär/
noun
So no help. IMO Mickey Mantle was a 'superstar' and Bernie Williams was a 'star'. Derek Jeter was at least a 'big' star. Prince Fielder (275 lbs.) and CC Sabathia (300+ lbs.) were also a 'big' stars in their primes
- a high-profile and extremely successful performer or athlete.
![]()
Thank you Gus for the correction. I can always count on you to keep me straight --with tact. Thanks.Broadway: I think you and Knight are talking about two different people. The Jim Foster with the Philly/Geno connection coached WBB at St. Joseph's, Vanderbilt, Ohio State, and now UT-Chattanooga.
Totally agree. Rare when a team without a bona fide 1st team AA (top 5, not top 10) wins the NC (props to Blair & TA&M). If you look at UCONN's 'lean' years, we had no 1st team AAs.
But why do you think the 'horses' come here? It's not like we have some unfair advantage due to all the 'free' talent that comes here for some random reason. Doesn't great coaching attract great talent?
Yes - in the sense that, at least for that season, they were dominant, go-to players in their team's scheme.
I wouldn't say that you need an "all-time" great, just a super-star for the time, and that's the way I took the post. If you were to nit-pick "super-stardom" you would also eliminate Md, Purdue and maybe some others. But to take Purdue, they had White and Figgs, which was enough.
Interestingly, I think you would further find that there needs be a decent supporting cast, i.e. for most teams the superstar can't do it on their own. Even Stiles, that I referred to earlier, had a 3 point shooting guard that was really what beat Rutgers in the tourney against Missouri State. Stiles didn't "go off", but the other player did.
I agree with much of what you say. A good coach (Dayton) with Uconn level of talent more than likely could win it all. Dayton had a great game plan and knew of Uconn's weakness to defend the dribble drive then mixed it up with the drive -pass out for the 3, with exceptional shooters, playing beyond their level---made the game exciting for 30 or so minutes. Was it great coaching or great stars that won that game??I don't think any team can win the NCAA Championship in this day and age without at least on superstar player. You also need a good coach, but IMO some lesser coaches than Geno could have won national championships with his talent. The ability of the UConn coaches to recruit the top talent makes their job a little easier when it comes to the actual game time performance of their athletes. They have the horses. If / when some other team beats them, it is due to either a sub-par performance by the UConn team or an outstanding performance by the opposing team. Look at the Dayton game last year. They competed for more than a half, but they were playing over their heads. Not to take away from Geno - he is the best coach in WCBB, but UConn had the absolute best talent in WCBB the last two years and in many other years where you have won the title.
Are you saying that Danielle Adams wasnt a big star ?