Coach P | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Coach P

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair. But I went to Vandy. And I feel I can blame the staff for that one. That's the only one that I fault him for.

I'm going to refer to that as the Commodore Bias. ;)
 
Sure, but none of the victories had anything to do with him, though....right? I mean, that is what you are saying. You're saying that his 5 wins would have all been achieved by Edsall (or someone else), and only his losses were in the balance, right? Does another coach beat a favored USF with this roster? Does another coach beat a very competitive Syracuse team with this roster? Does another coach absolutely whallop a favored Rutgers team with this roster??

The answer is, "I don't know." I'm not trying to give him a free-pass for anything. I'm trying to call it as fairly as I can. But I can't just say that the losses are on him, and not give any credit for the wins. And I don't think anyone else should either.

Syracuse went 1-6 last year in the Big East. What exactly is your definition of competitive?
 
Syracuse went 1-6 last year in the Big East. What exactly is your definition of competitive?

for argument sake, last year cuse beat wake and wvu. they finished the year on a dive going o for 5 (lville, uconn, pitt, usf, cincy)
 
I like pasqualoni ,he's a true football guy loves the game, is he the future? Nah he's the guy remodeling the house.
 
Pasqualoni is 62. JoePa coached to age 85, Bobby Bowden to age 80. Coach P might be here longer than Randy Edsall was, that would take him to 73. This could be quite a bit more than "remodeling." The guy looks like he's in great health.
 
.-.
I was hoping for someone like a Mario Cristobal, fully recognizing that if he was successful at UConn, he probably would not have stayed for more than 3 years. To me, that would have been worthwhile but I know not everyone would agree. He's a young guy with a track record of turning around a moribund program in FIU, has great recruiting ties to Florida and had experience in the Big East at RU.

All that being said, the decision was made in another direction and I'm not unhappy with PP. Could certain game situations been handled better? Of course with the Vandy game being front and center. That being said, I'm giving him at least one and probably two more years to see what he can do with "his" guys.
 
I remember when coach P, was givin the job, this board bash Uconn Hathaway for doing this, well I think we should give prop 2 both since Coach P, been here look at Uconn recruits or transfers, QB , 2 WR, lineman, 2 LB, and these kids r big time players, under Coach Edsall this wasnt happing, so 2 Coach P, continue 2 play it by your rule, go Uconn

I think most people on this board forget how successful PP was at SU.

SU was a national player under PP. His teams could play with and beat anyone in the country. Anyone.

He accomplished more that RR did at WVU or Kelly did at SU or Petrino did at UofL.

He recruited guys who not only dominated at the collegiate level, but also at the NFL level.

If past history is anything to go on, UCONN will be playing and winning multiple BCS games over the next few years - and finishing in the top 10, not backing into a BCS game, getting blown out and ending up outside the top 30 at 8-5
 
....that is if P has the success to warrant that tenure. I for one have been a fan of Pasqualoni and his style. He is not the flashiest guy (not that I want a guy like that), but I have no doubt in his sincerity or his love for his family and the school he represents. I think that is a combination that attracts bright student athletes, makes fans and alumni feel more at ease with the coach doing what is in the best interest of the university, and I think it also inspires every group in or around the football program to work on making it a success. Pasqualoni is a man that is loyal, hardworking, and as long as we don't forget that coaching successful teams requires some time, things will be brighter.

I think people are right to reserve judgement. A court case (that goes to trial) cannot be solved without deliberation, review, and presenting a convincing case, and an election cannot be won without winning over hearts and minds and the question often asked is, "are we better off now than we were when this guy took office.". I am willing to say that in the amount of time that Coach P has had, he has created more excitement and positive PR than I have witnessed before. He really makes you want to root for him.
 
P should shave his head bald and go with the Bruce Willis look . He would look 10 years younger and this nonsense of him being too old would go away. I'm saying this as someone who has successfully shaved away the gray. It works.
 
Syracuse went 1-6 last year in the Big East. What exactly is your definition of competitive?

HuskyfanDan sort of took care of this post for me, but let me add that we kept a 1,000+ yard rusher in check (Bailey), they had by far the best quarterback on the field (Nassib), arguably the best reciever on the field that day (Lemon 150+ yds; double of anyone on UConn), and the best tight end (Provo; even though I love Griffin, Provo was dominating that game). Oh, and by the way, defensive end Chandler Jones was the second highest draft pick out of the Big East this year (second only to Irvin from WVU).

So yeah, that's my definition of competitive. I'm going to go throw up now, because you made me defend those bastards from central NY. I will take solace in the fact that we have owned them over the last decade, so that should keep my food down...:confused:
 
When I heard Coach P come up as a possible choice it seemed like the best route to go. Having grown sick of the is he staying or is he going coaching drama of Edsall, I wanted someone who was going to stay here and take us up a notch recruiting wise. The first year results were tough but the team was in a rebuilding senario due to all the skill position losses. We could have went into a shell and tried to get wins the old way but the staff made an effort to win by going after it. I'm looking forward to the type of ball we play now. We got a very experienced guy at the helm and not someone who was a roll of the dice and he is a Connecticut guy.
 
.-.
I thought the Pitt game was an unmitigated disaster and the team looked like it quit, which can happen in college football. It is such a game of emotions that young players have trouble turning it around when a game goes against them.

Other than that, I thought Pasqualoni was pretty good during the season.
 
P should shave his head bald and go with the Bruce Willis look . He would look 10 years younger and this nonsense of him being too old would go away. I'm saying this as someone who has successfully shaved away the gray. It works.

I think P should gain some more weight and then he would look just like Norman Mailer.
 
I too was originally hoping for Tom Bradley...then when McGee's name entered the picture I thought he was the guy. The pipe dream of Rich Rod or Mike Leach wasn't going to happen under Hathaway so I didn't bother to think about that for more than a quick second. When P was hired I had a wait and see approach hoping he would be all in because he is a CT guy...a lot happier than if Hathaway had hired Whipple. I actually thought this was a hold the fort kind of hire...the so called safe hire. I promised myself I would give him at least 3 years before completely judging him. Jury is still out for me on the field...but I saw a lot of things scheme wise that with the right talent (which he and his staff seem to be able to recruit) would make things happen. This season will be a 8 win seasaon...next year will be the true proof.
 
Coach P has ON PAPER, significantly improved our recruiting prowess in a very short 15 months.

Agreed. Things have been encouraging since the close of the '11 season. Now . . . fans need to see improvement on the field. Last season was awful. Need to win more than 5 games. Need a "benchmark/signature" win (an NC State win will offer a lot more "currency" than a win over Buffalo). Oh and while I'm at it . . . some exciting football, particularly on offense and perhaps through the air. : )
 
P should shave his head bald and go with the Bruce Willis look . He would look 10 years younger and this nonsense of him being too old would go away. I'm saying this as someone who has successfully shaved away the gray. It works.

as someone that's chosen to maintain his ever-graying coif, i think you're a coward for shaving it;), and i hope P grows his hair long a la Rob Ryan.

i don't see how age is a mark against him at all. if anything i see it as a positive. he's got experience and connections that come with his age, and more importantly, he's not looking to go anywhere else. P's not that old, he can likely coach another 10 years and still retire at a 72. is there anyone else we could have hired with a great chance to keep for ten years if he's very successful?
 
.-.
I thought the Pitt game was an unmitigated disaster and the team looked like it quit, which can happen in college football. It is such a game of emotions that young players have trouble turning it around when a game goes against them.

Other than that, I thought Pasqualoni was pretty good during the season.

they could have very easily folded against Cinci, and i had a really hard time coming back to the game after halftime, but they really fought it out and played a great second half
 
The 2013 season is what will make or break it for me as far as Coach P. When I first heard he was being considered I silently crossed my fingers and hoped. A Connecticut guy who had success in the Big East and coached on "America's Team" in the NFL. The 2013 season should show a much more polished product and beating Michigan could catapult us into or near a top 25 ranking. Being ranked is what will get fannies in the seats and that electricity that winners generate will make fall in Connecticut very pleasant.
 
Agreed. Things have been encouraging since the close of the '11 season. Now . . . fans need to see improvement on the field. Last season was awful. Need to win more than 5 games. Need a "benchmark/signature" win (an NC State win will offer a lot more "currency" than a win over Buffalo). Oh and while I'm at it . . . some exciting football, particularly on offense and perhaps through the air. : )

last season wasn't awful. i agree we do need to win more than 5 games, if you think last season was awful you really need to get a passport out of fantasy land. we had an awful lot of issues going into the season with a new coach, new scheme, new QB and RB, among other issues, but all that being said we were in bowl contention until our last game. sometimes college football teams have bad years. it the nature of the short term career of a college athlete. how do you think Texas fans felt when they went 5-7 in 2010? it happens
 
last season wasn't awful. i agree we do need to win more than 5 games, if you think last season was awful you really need to get a passport out of fantasy land. we had an awful lot of issues going into the season with a new coach, new scheme, new QB and RB, among other issues, but all that being said we were in bowl contention until our last game. sometimes college football teams have bad years. it the nature of the short term career of a college athlete. how do you think Texas fans felt when they went 5-7 in 2010? it happens

It wasn't just the seven losses,matt. It was the way they lost. . .ZZzzzz. On a few occasions the defense was alright on defense and were more effective than the offense in putting points on the scoreboard. Score some points for gosh sakes. And, the posterboy play for '11 was the sack, strip, TD to open the Cincy game. Come on, throw it away or take the safety, but to get your lunch money taken away?
 
Score some points for gosh sakes.
With the pieces they had to work with?

And, the posterboy play for '11 was the sack, strip, TD to open the Cincy game. Come on, throw it away or take the safety, but to get your lunch money taken away?
That was on Coach P? I think it reinforces the point above about the pieces they had to work with.

Overall, I'm with ya TDH- want to see a strong O. I think we'll take a big step in the right direction this year, provided our O-Line holds.
 
.-.
P should shave his head bald and go with the Bruce Willis look . He would look 10 years younger and this nonsense of him being too old would go away. I'm saying this as someone who has successfully shaved away the gray. It works.
Only if you have the right head shape for it... I would look like Butterbean and King Kong Bundy had a child... not attractive.
 
last season wasn't awful. i agree we do need to win more than 5 games, if you think last season was awful you really need to get a passport out of fantasy land. we had an awful lot of issues going into the season with a new coach, new scheme, new QB and RB, among other issues, but all that being said we were in bowl contention until our last game. sometimes college football teams have bad years. it the nature of the short term career of a college athlete. how do you think Texas fans felt when they went 5-7 in 2010? it happens

Even with all the issues on offense, you could argue that if not for the injury to Blidi, and the lack of depth in the secondary we would have gone to a bowl game.
 
just want to remind everyone the hideous way the Vandy, Iowa State and Western Michigan games were lost. All three had various levels of coaching blunders. Please don't make those losses Edsall's fault, there was enough talent on the field to win. Good thing is I don't think Manuel/Herbst are giving P the long leash others seem to want to give him.
 
Edsall was in Storrs because his daughter was graduating. As for wearing UConn gear..............no explanation.
 
just want to remind everyone the hideous way the Vandy, Iowa State and Western Michigan games were lost. All three had various levels of coaching blunders. Please don't make those losses Edsall's fault, there was enough talent on the field to win. Good thing is I don't think Manuel/Herbst are giving P the long leash others seem to want to give him.

Can you please explain to me how the Iowa St. loss was on the coaches? That's the one game that I think people have no right to rip the coaches for. There were plays to be made all over the field that night. All night long.

That loss is on the players. It happens sometimes.
 
Can you please explain to me how the Iowa St. loss was on the coaches? That's the one game that I think people have no right to rip the coaches for. There were plays to be made all over the field that night. All night long.

That loss is on the players. It happens sometimes.

That was a tough one to swallow, 3 picks in the first quarter that were only turned in 3 points is just unacceptable. That needed to be a win. The WM game was another tough one to take. Vandy too. Just a few plays away from being bowl eligible and having 6 or 7 wins instead of 5. Just leaves me shaking my head. Oh well. On to 2012. No sense in looking back on it now.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,289
Messages
4,561,585
Members
10,455
Latest member
UConnGabby


Top Bottom