Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Mike75, post: 4923216, member: 4312"] Fair point, but that was also a different era before cord cutting and streaming. Neither MD or Rutgers would draw much interest if the decision were made today, certainly not at a full share IMO. And I'm not sure that UVA or UNC move the needle in terms of additive revenue that would offset a full share either. A partial share, sure - but how much more than what they get from the ACC currently? If you look at the recent SEC and B1G additions, all have been historically "good to great" football programs, better than UVA or UNC. I'm sure there are other considerations, but the quality of the football program seems to be a constant. [/QUOTE]