I hated this post.
You were right.
Okafor is just a bad matchup for Brimah. Okafor is good. Brimah is talented but started playing basketball late.
I hated this post.
You were right.
youre a clown. Entering the game he cut had cut his fouls in half. jackassI remember thinking when you posted this, "this is wrong."
I was thinking 12 seconds in, "yeah, he's still foul prone."
He played 13 minutes.
You completely miscalled this one.
He's foul prone. Period. Your post, particularly given its timing, was just 180 degree wrong, and the results show it. It's all fine and dandy to say, "he way playing Okafor, so it's an exception." No. It's not. It's what he is, for now.Entering the game he cut had cut his fouls in half.
I should have worded it "he has lowered his foul rate considerably", thats about it. You're still a clown for retroactively bumping threads to prove a point.He's foul prone. Period. Your post, particularly given its timing, was just 180 degree wrong, and the results show it. It's all fine and dandy to say, "he way playing Okafor, so it's an exception." No. It's not. It's what he is, for now.
You wrote, "Brimah doesn't get in foul trouble anymore." He was on the bench 12 seconds in and got 5 fouls in 13 minutes. What would you need to understand how poorly thought out your post and your logic was? A letter from Dickie V signed by Jim Calhoun?
Amida is foul prone. Maybe by the end of the year he won't be. But right now, against any sort of decent competition, he's going to be at risk of sitting long stretches.
I agree he lowered his foul rate considerably. Sorry to clown you. You just stuck your head way out there, and, occasionally, we all need a reminded to keep it tight.I should have worded it "he has lowered his foul rate considerably", thats about it. You're still a clown for retroactively bumping threads to prove a point.