C
Chief00
Chump change only if someone else is paying LOLHis buyout is about $5m. Chump change if boosters want him gone.
Chump change only if someone else is paying LOLHis buyout is about $5m. Chump change if boosters want him gone.
I don't disagree. I just think the bowl game last year bight him year 4.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Diaco, for right or wrong, could be a great HC- he just needs to be less stubborn about the team's offensive philosophy and take some chances with the ball. If its a personell issue then its a bigger problem than just Diaco here. I can totally see a change at QB coming if we're 2-5 going into UCF.
We are going to be sitting at 2-3 going into the Cincy game. This is a home game. This is basically our real rivalry game. 2-4 is unacceptable especially considering we have USF and ECU on the road two of the three weeks after that. I truly believe the rest of the season hinges on that game. A win, and we are 3-3 with arguably 4 winnable games left. A loss, and we are 2-4, and I am a lot less confident we will win all four. The Cincy game is basically for a bowl. If we don't get to a bowl, he's done. Cincy is his alamo.
Recruiting and eval is an art. Diaco appears to be no Rembrandt. Plenty of talent in PA, NY, NJ, Mass to go around. Dare I say Edsall (despite is low power O) could find quality.Are you kidding? You think he is the reason why we don't have athletes like Houston? Do you think he's trying to recruit sub-standard players?
That is so true!When you know the guy you have is not the guy it is always best to end it sooner rather than later. As touchdown says the longer you wait the longer it sets you back.
Recruiting and eval is an art. Diaco appears to be no Rembrandt. Plenty of talent in PA, NY, NJ, Mass to go around. Dare I say Edsall (despite is low power O) could find quality.
raising $5MM from our boosters has been proven to be not all that easyHis buyout is about $5m. Chump change if boosters want him gone.
Perhaps your best post ever.Chump change only if someone else is paying LOL
Congratulations. You've taken this board to another level with this thread. Care to guess the direction?
I'm not convinced Cincy is anything special, I guess we'll know a lot after next week.This team is not that bad, despite Diaco's GameDay incompetence, and the schedule is not that tough. UConn will pick up some more wins.
The 'Alamo' stuff is a little over the top, but the succeeding points have merit, esp. likelihood of a bowl decreasing severely w/a loss to Cincy. IMO the post-shaming is a little "out of order" here. Also IMO, BD does need two more wins to stay.
I'm not convinced Cincy is anything special, I guess we'll know a lot after next week.
The Cincy game is basically for a bowl. If we don't get to a bowl, he's done. Cincy is his alamo.
Technically they were Texians.I don't know if that is a good analogy. The Texans lost the battle at the Alamo and all of them were slaughtered, but their sacrifice allowed other Texans to regroup and win the war.
So unless you think Cincy is an ovetwhelming force that will destroy UConn and somehow that will make you better, it just doesn't work
Don't poke holes in it. Just let it slide.I don't know if that is a good analogy. The Texans lost the battle at the Alamo and all of them were slaughtered, but their sacrifice allowed other Texans to regroup and win the war.
So unless you think Cincy is an ovetwhelming force that will destroy UConn and somehow that will make you better, it just doesn't work