It's not logical data if you're using it to make a subjective judgement about the officiating. Realistically, ask yourself how many times during the game did you think to yourself, or out loud, that a call was missed? Was it a bad call, a wrong team, or a no-call that should have been whistled?That gets very subjective. I rather go by logical data - when your opponent shoots 150% more foul shoots despite you winning by 25, data alarm bells go off since the team behind normally commits more fouls trying to get back in the game. They only made 8 shots in the paint all night, us 21!