Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Charlie Creme UCONN Praise
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="CamrnCrz1974, post: 3112058, member: 1052"] Mechelle Voepel has covered women's basketball since 1984. She joined ESPN.com in 1996 as a women’s college and pro basketball writer. In addition, she has covered both the Summer and Winter Olympics, the Women's World Cup soccer tournament, and several professional golf major tournaments. She has attended over 20 straight Women’s Basketball Final Fours. But her questioning whether something was a flagrant foul (specifically wondering if the foul was intentional) and your brief meeting with her a couple of years ago form the basis for your opinion that she is both not a fan of Katie Lou Samuelson and not a fan of UConn? As an aside, I have heard Rebecca Lobo, Kara Lawson, Debbie Antonelli, Doris Burke, etc. (among WCBB analysts/commentators) and Jeff Van Gundy, Doris Burke, Marc Jackson, etc. (among NBA analysts/commentators) question flagrant fouls and wondering if they were intentional. I did not conclude that there was any inherent bias against the player who was the recipient of the flagrant foul. As an aside, calling fouls in basketball has an objective component (the respective rulebooks of the NBA, NBA, MBB, WBB, etc.) as well as the subjective component by the individual official or the officiating team for that game. If it were completely open and obvious, coaches (and players) would not be so irate about calls that went against them. Heck, I was discussing figure skating in a similar manner. IJS has a points system for values of base elements and technical requirements. But even then, was the triple Lutz off an inside or outside edge? What was the caller's vantage point? And why is there so much variance in the PCS (program components) scores? There will always be an element of subjectivity, even with objective standards, because people see and interpret things differently? As a second aside, I do have a bias, because Mechelle Voepel is a friend of mine whom I see in person 2-3 times per year and with whom I communicate on a weekly basis. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,410
Messages
4,395,005
Members
10,208
Latest member
jskwrite
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Charlie Creme UCONN Praise
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom