- Joined
- Dec 1, 2022
- Messages
- 738
- Reaction Score
- 2,936
It's Cam Spencer or bust for repeat title chances.
I'm not sure about that. I think there is still quite a few good players in the transfer portal who are shooters that can help. Let's give it time to see how this off season pans out before stating whether we have a chance or not. Either way we should be really good next year with a lot of young exciting players coming off the bench and at least one starting.It's Cam Spencer or bust for repeat title chances.
Our title chances depend on a Rutgers guy?It's Cam Spencer or bust for repeat title chances.
Bill Self has a lot to do with it.Why is Kansas #1 everywhere? Dajuan Harris, Timberlake, KJ Adams, McCullar, Dickinson is a very good lineup on paper but it doesn't seem super dynamic. Elmarko Jackson is a great recruit. Are they expecting the highly ranked freshmen who averaged 2 points per game last season to have major leaps? Are they expecting the Texas transfer to make a big leap?
They lost far and away their two best players in Jalen Wilson and Gradey .
True, he's an awesome coach.Bill Self has a lot to do with it.
He's paying off the guys doing the rankings?Bill Self has a lot to do with it.
They clearly messed up badly not ranking UConn preseason last year. Our preseason ranking this year shouldn't have anything to do with them blowing it last year.I think the range we’re being predicted in is more than fair. We lost three outstanding players from a team that was dominant in the NCAA tournament but, to be fair, finished 4th in its conference and lost in the conference semis. While there is a lot of talent coming into the program, even the returnees are not without questions. Karaban was an outstanding shooter as the last option in the offense. Can he be as effective now that he will be option 1 or 1A? Can DC make the transition from 12 minutes a game to 28, and, if so, can he possibly play as hard running the floor every minute as he did last year? And will Tristan improve at all, because remember that much of the fan base spent much of the year proclaiming his mediocrity.
I’m not saying we can’t be good — I think we can be — but I’m not sure that on paper this team is better coming into the season than last year’s team, and last year’s team was ranked lower than this.
Look at what Kansas lost and they're consensus #1.Top 15 is generous considering who we lost. The freshmen will need time to adjust, and DC will need to adjust to being the main guy at Center. Both will take time.
I expect we will be top ten in February and beyond.
I think that is a bad call. But I will be very happy if I am wrong about the first half of our season.Look at what Kansas lost and they're consensus #1.
What's really funny (and goes back to my complaints last offseason) is that this team isn't as good as last year's team, even on paper. We clearly should have been top 10 preseason last year. These hacks are so lazy writing these things. I think 11 is a probably a bit high right now, unless we get some transfer help.Updated now that we know who is staying in the NBA Draft. Huskies at #11. I could see anywhere from 10-20 so #11 seems pretty fair IMO.
11. UConn
This ranking is based on the Huskies returning three of the top five scorers - Tristen Newton, Alex Karaban and Donovan Clingan - from a team that won the 2023 NCAA Tournament. That core combined with a top-five recruiting class should have UConn as a real contender to win back-to-back national championships.
College basketball rankings: Zach Edey's return has Purdue No. 2 in Top 25 And 1 following NBA Draft deadline
There was plenty of movement in our rankings after the deadline for players to withdraw from the NBA Draft and return to schoolwww.cbssports.com
That's a stretch too. Their guards and wings look fantastic, but they have no depth up front at all due to the transfers out. Dickinson is going to have to play a lot and when he doesn't KU gets very small. They are unbelievably thin up front.Look at what Kansas lost and they're consensus #1.
We had a lot of questions heading into last year, just like this year. Hawk, Clingan, Newton and AK were unproven at this level.What's really funny (and goes back to my complaints last offseason) is that this team isn't as good as last year's team, even on paper. We clearly should have been top 10 preseason last year. These hacks are so lazy writing these things. I think 11 is a probably a bit high right now, unless we get some transfer help.
And Duke's entire roster was freshmen and they were top 5. We had a lot fewer questions than almost anybody. Karaban was the one starter that wasn't a known quantity, but in pre-season we also had Johnson. The people putting these together don't do much to get them right.We had a lot of questions heading into last year, just like this year. Hawk, Clingan, Newton and AK were unproven at this level.
Hawkins and Newton were not known quantities, you know that. Being a good player on a bad AAC team jumping to a major conference is a question mark, and the staff in the preseason knew it based on reports from practice. Hawkins was overall mediocre at best his frosh year (mediocre is a compliment for how he played). So that’s 3/5 that were up in the air to some degree.And Duke's entire roster was freshmen and they were top 5. We had a lot fewer questions than almost anybody. Karaban was the one starter that wasn't a known quantity, but in pre-season we also had Johnson. The people putting these together don't do much to get them right.
With Hawkins the staff new he had an injury riddled fresman year(He had consussion problems all throughout the year). He is a top 55 recruit so we all knew his potential and saw at times in his fresman year(Like Auburn and Georgetown). The staff was confident with a great offseason this kid had the tools to be great so I wouldn't call him unknown quantity.Hawkins and Newton were not known quantities, you know that. Being a good player on a bad AAC team jumping to a major conference is a question mark, and the staff in the preseason knew it based on reports from practice. Hawkins was overall mediocre at best his frosh year (mediocre is a compliment for how he played). So that’s 3/5 that were up in the air to some degree.
We’ll be no. 1 after we beat them in DecemberLook at what Kansas lost and they're consensus #1.
Newton was first team all AAC and Hawkins was already projected as a first round pick based on how he finished his freshman year. They were as solid as anybody other than Sanogo. Alleyne was a starter for an ACC team. Andre was a known quantity. The question, if there was one, was about Hurley and whether he could win in the post season and make adjustments.Hawkins and Newton were not known quantities, you know that. Being a good player on a bad AAC team jumping to a major conference is a question mark, and the staff in the preseason knew it based on reports from practice. Hawkins was overall mediocre at best his frosh year (mediocre is a compliment for how he played). So that’s 3/5 that were up in the air to some degree.