CBS Sports: Ranking top 25 college basketball programs of last 25 years | Page 2 | The Boneyard

CBS Sports: Ranking top 25 college basketball programs of last 25 years

A better comparison would be SF Giants versus Yankees, I am pretty sure royals and marlins have the same championship count as the yankees (maybe florida has 2).... Whereas the Giants have 3 WS (maybe 4?) versus 1 for the yankees. I for the record would rather have rooted for the giants the last 25 years
That's a bad comparison. The Giants were really good most of the time. We're talking about a team that wins a title and misses the playoffs most of the time vs a team that makes the playoffs regularly and even loses in championship games or league championships winning roughly the same number of titles.
 
Would you say that the Kansas fans and UConn fans have had the same experience since 2000? Would you rather be a Kansas fan than a UConn fan?
I think there's a reasonable argument either way. Some would choose more titles and the bad years, some would choose fewer titles and making a run every year. It's entirely subjective and I think that one is pretty close and could go either way. Kansas fans under 50 don't even remember missing the tournament so it's hard for them to even know what that is like.
 
Big Ten teams do care a lot about league titles (at least according to the Big Ten fans that talk about such things, like Mark Titus). SEC fans probably not as much, though now that the league is suddenly really good at basketball, maybe that will change.

I think if you moved it 1 year into the future (and so MSU lost their lone title), it would swing pretty far in Florida's favor, but at least MSU had one plus all the other success. You still cut down nets for a Final Four, and MSU had 7 of them in the last 25 years.
League titles don't register at all on a national level. Sure, if you're MSU maybe you can talk trash to your UM neighbor at the local brewery.
 
Incidentally, a lot of the feast or famine talk that has dogged UConn over the past 30 years is going away under Hurley. We make the tournament even in "down" years, which did not used to happen. Barring something catastrophic this year we are looking at a sixth straight berth, which is unprecedented for us and smooths out the peaks and valleys pattern
 
I think there's a reasonable argument either way. Some would choose more titles and the bad years, some would choose fewer titles and making a run every year. It's entirely subjective and I think that one is pretty close and could go either way. Kansas fans under 50 don't even remember missing the tournament so it's hard for them to even know what that is like.
You didn't answer the question.

I asked you personally, would you rather be a Kansas fan or a UConn fan the past 25 years?
 
That's a bad comparison. The Giants were really good most of the time. We're talking about a team that wins a title and misses the playoffs most of the time vs a team that makes the playoffs regularly and even loses in championship games or league championships winning roughly the same number of titles.
Would you rather be a Yankees fan or a Red Sox fan the past 25 years?
 
.-.
Big Ten teams do care a lot about league titles
Probably because national championships are largely an unattainable goal for them, at least in the modern era.

It isn't worth the time to Google, but I'm pretty sure we have more national championships than the Big Ten does in total.
 
Probably because national championships are largely an unattainable goal for them, at least in the modern era.

It isn't worth the time to Google, but I'm pretty sure we have more national championships than the Big Ten does in total.
The Big Ten Conference has 10 NCAA men’s basketball championships all-time.

Here’s the breakdown by school:
  • Indiana – 5 (1940, 1953, 1976, 1981, 1987)
  • Michigan State – 2 (1979, 2000)
  • Michigan – 1 (1989)
  • Ohio State – 1 (1960)
  • Wisconsin – 1 (1941)
3 in modern era. 1 since 99. Never know how to qualify those ancient titles as they’re artifacts at this point.
 
Several flaws in his logic such as narrowing the evaluation to total wins as the deciding factor downplaying the actual achievements that define greatness in college basketball.

UConn gets low marks for missing tournaments and that skews ranking.

5 titles and 6 Final Fours are unmatched by any other team on that list.

His biased flaw is assuming that dips in performance somehow cancel out championships when in reality UConn's peaks at the very top matter more in legacy rankings than filling the middle with steady but lesser result

Then he moves to the absurd. UConn has won its 5 titles under three different coaches, somehow winning with multiple coaches is a bad thing.

If anything , it proves institutional strength and not just a single legacy coach dynasty. Our ability to reload and win under different regimes should add weight, not reduce it.

The true testament of a great program is postseason dominance and not simply padding regular season records or wins.

I get it, these guys don't really care, but the truth speaks for itself.
You need to understand their methodology:

1 - Place Duke at the top of the list.
2 - Formulate a set of criteria that supports criteria #1.
3 - Diminish UConn's accomplishments as much as reasonably possible.
4 - Fine tune the set of criteria to best support criteria #3 while still fully supporting criteria#1.
 
The Big Ten Conference has 10 NCAA men’s basketball championships all-time.

Here’s the breakdown by school:
  • Indiana – 5 (1940, 1953, 1976, 1981, 1987)
  • Michigan State – 2 (1979, 2000)
  • Michigan – 1 (1989)
  • Ohio State – 1 (1960)
  • Wisconsin – 1 (1941)
3 in modern era. 1 since 99. Never know how to qualify those ancient titles as they’re artifacts at this point.
1975 is the extended modern era (expanded to 32 teams and started having at-large bids and was more influential than NIT at that point) and in that timeframe the Big Ten has 6 and UConn has 6.
 
Probably because national championships are largely an unattainable goal for them, at least in the modern era.

It isn't worth the time to Google, but I'm pretty sure we have more national championships than the Big Ten does in total.
Do they grandfather titles? They probably do. Bill Walton, Big Ten legend
 
.-.
Probably because national championships are largely an unattainable goal for them, at least in the modern era.

It isn't worth the time to Google, but I'm pretty sure we have more national championships than the Big Ten does in total.
You are correct. Twice as many in fact. Starting with 1985 (first NCAA Tournament with 64 teams) the Big Ten has won 3 titles. 1987 Indiana, 1989 Michigan, and 2000 Michigan State. Can't count 2002 Maryland since they were in the ACC back then.
 
Would you rather be a Yankees fan or a Red Sox fan the past 25 years?
I'd rather chop off an arm than be a Yankees fan in any period. But I don't get the point. The Sox have the 4th most wins since 2000.

Maybe you could ask whether you'd want to be a Cleveland Guardians fan, 7th most wins since 2000 or a Royals fans, fewest wins but one WS.
 
Would you rather be a Yankees fan or a Red Sox fan the past 25 years?
As a Red Sox fan I go back and forth. The highs have been incredibly high (2004, 2007, 2013, 2018), and we've had other almost-there contending years (2003, 2008, 2016-17, 2021), but we've also had a share of soul-crushing lows/embarassments (also 2003, 2011, 2012, forgettable years in 2010, 2014, 2015, 2019, and the last few until this year).

The Yankees have been consistently in contention but fell short routinely.

I suppose it's more fun watching highlights from years you know resulted in a title.
 
Would you say that the Kansas fans and UConn fans have had the same experience since 2000? Would you rather be a Kansas fan than a UConn fan?
They would probably say they take great pride in their consistency as opposed to some team getting lucky 6 times in 25 seasons.......
I know one fairly well and he even rationalized giving Self the lifetime "get out of jail free card" included in his last contract.
 
I'd rather chop off an arm than be a Yankees fan in any period. But I don't get the point. The Sox have the 4th most wins since 2000.

Maybe you could ask whether you'd want to be a Cleveland Guardians fan, 7th most wins since 2000 or a Royals fans, fewest wins but one WS.
You don't get the point? The Yankees have been much more consistent than the Red Sox and the Red Sox have doubled them up in titles. Kansas has been much more consistent than UConn and UConn has more than doubled Kansas up in titles.
 
You didn't answer the question.

I asked you personally, would you rather be a Kansas fan or a UConn fan the past 25 years?
The question is irrational as posed to me, I'm both. I have the best of both worlds.

UConn fans probably put too much on championships
KU fans probably put too much on never missing the tournament and total wins
MSU fans probably put too much on final four appearances
Duke fans probably put too much on their wonderful paper rosters and NBA players
 
.-.
The Big Ten Conference has 10 NCAA men’s basketball championships all-time.

Here’s the breakdown by school:
  • Indiana – 5 (1940, 1953, 1976, 1981, 1987)
  • Michigan State – 2 (1979, 2000)
  • Michigan – 1 (1989)
  • Ohio State – 1 (1960)
  • Wisconsin – 1 (1941)
3 in modern era. 1 since 99. Never know how to qualify those ancient titles as they’re artifacts at this point.
Nobody gives much credence to the titles won before 1969 except Kentucky, Indiana and a few others.
How little attention the games got could best be illustrated by when Final Four games were first televised:
1963-Syndicated broadcast of the title game for the first time.
1969-National broadcast by NBC of the title game and consolation game and regional broadcasts of the semi-final games.
1969-72-Final Four games split between regional and national telecasts, with markets receiving different games.
1973-NBC moved the championship game to a prime time Monday night slot.
1974-NBC's coverage expanded, including regional finals being aired nationally.
1978-For the first time, all regional finals were televised nationally by NBC.
 
UConn fans get caught up in the Brimah thing too much. It’s kind of weird. I’m not saying you are one of them, but there’s definitely people on the board that always mention that Brimah play. They don’t mention it with joy, but as a way to put down that team. I don’t get it.

Many, many championship teams have barely survived at one or two points in the tourney. I hate that someone always mentions that. We deserved that title and we were the best team in the tourney. Our guards ran it.
Great post. I do agree. The point i was hoping to make was that if we lost that game, our regular season wasnt enough to call us the best team. In other words, the best team in the tourney has to be called the Best team of that year. Its like bar trivia where the first ten questions are worth 5 pts apiece but the final question is worth 100. Not exactly fair, but only 1 true winner.
 
Great post. I do agree. The point i was hoping to make was that if we lost that game, our regular season wasnt enough to call us the best team. In other words, the best team in the tourney has to be called the Best team of that year. Its like bar trivia where the first ten questions are worth 5 pts apiece but the final question is worth 100. Not exactly fair, but only 1 true winner.
I know your point and I know you aren’t one of those whiners. I just had to say something. It makes me nuts when they do it. I guess I wish you picked a different example. 😂
 
The question is irrational as posed to me, I'm both. I have the best of both worlds.

UConn fans probably put too much on championships
KU fans probably put too much on never missing the tournament and total wins
MSU fans probably put too much on final four appearances
Duke fans probably put too much on their wonderful paper rosters and NBA players
Well sure if you pick multiple teams as your favorite you can experience even more winning. I consider it a no brainer that it's been way better being a UConn fan because we win way more championships than Kansas.

Winning championships is what it's all about.

Red Sox have had it better than the Yankees the past 25 years as well, the gap in championships is less between them than the gap between UConn and Kansas though.
 
You don't get the point? The Yankees have been much more consistent than the Red Sox and the Red Sox have doubled them up in titles. Kansas has been much more consistent than UConn and UConn has more than doubled Kansas up in titles.
But the Sox have been way more consistent than UConn, and the Yankees not nearly as consistent as Kansas. I also get nowhere near the overall joy of participation in the MLB playoffs that I get being part of the NCAA tournament.
 
But the Sox have been way more consistent than UConn, and the Yankees not nearly as consistent as Kansas. I also get nowhere near the overall joy of participation in the MLB playoffs that I get being part of the NCAA tournament.
I wish I was a fan of two great programs. I often wish I went to grad school at a great football school so that CR wouldn’t bother me so much. I’d have a team if UConn never gets the call.
 
.-.
I wish I was a fan of two great programs. I often wish I went to grad school at a great football school so that CR wouldn’t bother me so much. I’d have a team if UConn never gets the call.
I am truly lucky to be a huge college basketball fan who happened to attend those two schools. No doubt about it. My college football luck is well, a bit less.
 
I am truly lucky to be a huge college basketball fan who happened to attend those two schools. No doubt about it. My college football luck is well, a bit less.
Kansas football has been fun recently though. I actually think UConn football is fun again too. I’m just worried about the future.
 
Kansas football has been fun recently though. I actually think UConn football is fun again too. I’m just worried about the future.
KU was good when I was there (Glen Mason era), which was fun. They had the Orange bowl win some time back. Both teams pretty good right now, I’m liking that. I want to go check out the new stadium in Lawrence.
 
Nobody gives much credence to the titles won before 1969 except Kentucky, Indiana and a few others.
How little attention the games got could best be illustrated by when Final Four games were first televised:
1963-Syndicated broadcast of the title game for the first time.
1969-National broadcast by NBC of the title game and consolation game and regional broadcasts of the semi-final games.
1969-72-Final Four games split between regional and national telecasts, with markets receiving different games.
1973-NBC moved the championship game to a prime time Monday night slot.
1974-NBC's coverage expanded, including regional finals being aired nationally.
1978-For the first time, all regional finals were televised nationally by NBC.
“Nobody gives much credence to the titles won before 1969.” Count me among the nobodies.

UCLA won four titles in five years (‘64, ‘65, ‘67, ‘68 ) with a combined record of 117-3.
 
UConn fans get caught up in the Brimah thing too much. It’s kind of weird. I’m not saying you are one of them, but there’s definitely people on the board that always mention that Brimah play. They don’t mention it with joy, but as a way to put down that team. I don’t get it.

Many, many championship teams have barely survived at one or two points in the tourney. I hate that someone always mentions that. We deserved that title and we were the best team in the tourney. Our guards ran it.
Actually, I never heard it metioned before and I was totally unfamiliar with it
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,132
Messages
4,554,385
Members
10,437
Latest member
poppopwow


Top Bottom