Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ctchamps, post: 3548932, member: 37"] Again dying is only a part of the issue. A significant number of people under 55 and older than 35 were hospitalized and required intensive care. So we just don't debate between economics and medical I'm going to throw in some information that doesn't alter the economic and medical predicament we currently are under but I haven't noticed mentioned elsewhere. Medical: Remdesivir is just the start for medical treatment of the virus. EIDD 2801 is another nucleoside analog that is showing potential and can be made in a pill form allowing for a much less expensive and quicker roll out for treatment. I expect over the next six months to a year an announcement that a medical treatment to alleviate the disease to be forthcoming. And a vaccination probably won't be far behind. [URL='https://apnews.com/b935700622fddf2d9f5312361d7b28f4']Promising Treatment[/URL] There are several anti inflammatory studies being done to inhibit or decrease the severe cascading response to the infection. Economic: For all the debate in this forum, the reporting in the news or the statements made by politicians the most salient point is how will Americans react to day to day situations. This article shows that people were reacting similarly in spite of the rhetoric throughout America. [URL='https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/upshot/pandemic-economy-government-orders.html']Government Orders Alone Didn’t Close the Economy. They Probably Can’t Reopen It.[/URL] This article shows that the lowest paid workers in the USA actually benefit until July 31st while the country is in lockdown. [URL='https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/09/it-pays-to-stay-unemployed-that-might-be-a-good-thing.html']It pays to stay unemployed. That might be a good thing[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach