California State Travel Ban Impacting College Games? | The Boneyard

California State Travel Ban Impacting College Games?

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,318
Reaction Score
5,280
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but it seems to me that any attempt by
the State to interfere with the execution of a legal contract entered into before the
passage of the law would leave the State open to a lawsuit.

So I think this will only affect future scheduling, not currently contracted games.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,796
Reaction Score
45,657
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but it seems to me that any attempt by
the State to interfere with the execution of a legal contract entered into before the
passage of the law would leave the State open to a lawsuit.

So I think this will only affect future scheduling, not currently contracted games.


I think you're right but what the heck do UCLA, Cal and other big time public universities do when it comes to scheduling in the future? Puts ADs in a tough position.....
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,161
Reaction Score
21,326
I think you're right but what the heck do UCLA, Cal and other big time public universities do when it comes to scheduling in the future? Puts ADs in a tough position.....

I don't believe we are on the no travel list so we can offer triple header one and ones.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,318
Reaction Score
5,280
I think you're right but what the heck do UCLA, Cal and other big time public universities do when it comes to scheduling in the future? Puts ADs in a tough position.....

Plus the fact that some potential bowl games for UCLA or Cal would be off limits.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
21,637
Reaction Score
52,366
Plus the fact that some potential bowl games for UCLA or Cal would be off limits.

2 of the 6 PAC bowl games are in TX. They could easily reallocate the teams so that Cal &UCLA went elsewhere. And note the ban is only on state-sponsored travel. Not sure who pays for bowl expenses - it might be the game.
 

triaddukefan

Tobacco Road Gastronomer
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,404
Reaction Score
59,280
2 of the 6 PAC bowl games are in TX. They could easily reallocate the teams so that Cal &UCLA went elsewhere. And note the ban is only on state-sponsored travel. Not sure who pays for bowl expenses - it might be the game.

Cal wont going to a bowl game in the immediate future.... they dont have to worry about anything.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,076
Reaction Score
14,074
Most of the larger schools, particularly the PAC 12 members, have athletic programs which are all funded through private donations, sponsorship and other sources of non-state money. They'll all be able to travel anyplace they want to. The smaller state colleges that don't have the ability to fund their entire athletic programs privately may be affected by it. However, the smaller schools aren't likely to travel quite as far as the larger schools, so the likelihood of them going to the banned states is probably significantly less than the larger schools might be likely to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Mar 3, 2017
Messages
589
Reaction Score
1,236
What is California going to do when their list gets up to 30 or 40 states? It will get that high or higher, because once you start banning anything for any reason, the list of reasons will begin to grow. No group wants to be left out of the "reasons for banning".
 

temery

What?
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
20,327
Reaction Score
37,705
Is tuition, fees, donations, ticket and merchandising revenue for a school considered state money?
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
Is tuition, fees, donations, ticket and merchandising revenue for a school considered state money?
Only for state chartered schools---the State can ban those schools, supposedly state supported; but it would be hard pressed to BAN and enforce it to "privately funded " schools.
If the financial squeeze becomes a factor--you will soon see how quickly some changes happen or what is ignored. So much for social graces.
 

Online statistics

Members online
677
Guests online
4,231
Total visitors
4,908

Forum statistics

Threads
157,008
Messages
4,076,641
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom