Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="8893, post: 2726290, member: 93"] Your meme is 100% accurate. As for the rest, I will leave it that I believe JC knows things that may be material to the dispute. I don't want to hypothesize further about what those things may be because I didn't like it when others hypothesized about what KO may or may not have done to warrant a just cause firing under the contract. Once suggested, hypotheticals have a way of taking on a life of their own here, and I don't desire to do that to any of our guys. For me, this has become a debate team or moot court exercise taken too far. I used to love showing up and being assigned one side of an issue for one debate, and then having to take the other side in the next. You make the best arguments with what you have, but none of us knows what the operative facts really are here. It is fun for me as an exercise, but not so much fun when taken out of context, which is inevitable here--and not fair to the people involved imo. [/QUOTE]