- Joined
- Apr 4, 2019
- Messages
- 978
- Reaction Score
- 4,481
Smart move on her part. Still stays within the Midwest. And, the Fever are young with talent. Wishing her well.
Trying to project who will and won't make it in the W isn't something I'm a fan of. For example, I wouldn't count out Holmes. Considering she wasn't highly recruited, who would have projected her to be one of the better post players in NCAA and a NPOY candidate by this point?Last year people were speaking that Boston might return for year 5. I never thought she would as she was the clear number one draft selection and in that case players should move on.
I know Kitley, Holmes, and Jackson all came back for year 5 but I'd say only Jackson will likely stick in the W. Every player has to make the decision that is best for them.
You're forgetting a few teams from there conference she plays in who should be on this listI imagine a lot of SCar, UConn, and Iowa State fans are happy with this announcement.
I love it that Clark and the beloved former Scar legend Boston will be teammates. Scar fans will be conflicted.
. I believe there may be some fans in Indiana, Ohio State and Maryland who may be happy, to name a few. However, this may be short lived with Watkins, Betts and their respective teams coming to conference play.I think Megan Gustafson is a better comparison as far as playing style. She's bounced around, kind of had to reinvent herself as a player, but I think she's a solid contributor in the W now.Trying to project who will and won't make it in the W isn't something I'm a fan of. For example, I wouldn't count out Holmes. Considering she wasn't highly recruited, who would have projected her to be one of the better post players in NCAA and a NPOY candidate by this point?
For comparison, I look at Naz Hillmon and Bridget Carleton as examples of players who some didn't expect to stick in the W. Atlanta recently exercised their 4th year option of Hillmon's contract. Some thought Amihere was going to surplant her when she was drafted last season.
Carleton recently resigned with Minnesota after being drafted and cut by Connecticut. Some didn't think she'd survive beyond the first couple seasons. And Minnesota had drafted Dangerfield who was a ROY winner only to cut her afterwards and she bounced around a bit before settling in Dallas (think she's still there for 2024?)
All I can say is who really knows?
You make valid points and there is never any real way to guess who makes it and who doesn't. I think Jackson has more upside but that's no guarantee either.Trying to project who will and won't make it in the W isn't something I'm a fan of. For example, I wouldn't count out Holmes. Considering she wasn't highly recruited, who would have projected her to be one of the better post players in NCAA and a NPOY candidate by this point?
For comparison, I look at Naz Hillmon and Bridget Carleton as examples of players who some didn't expect to stick in the W. Atlanta recently exercised their 4th year option of Hillmon's contract. Some thought Amihere was going to surplant her when she was drafted last season.
Carleton recently resigned with Minnesota after being drafted and cut by Connecticut. Some didn't think she'd survive beyond the first couple seasons. And Minnesota had drafted Dangerfield who was a ROY winner only to cut her afterwards and she bounced around a bit before settling in Dallas (think she's still there for 2024?)
All I can say is who really knows?
She can probably play either guard position and be great at either. She’s such a great passer I think she’ll be a terrific PG. Goodness, imagine Boston, Smith, Mitchell, Clark and whoever they decide for the 3rd guard and that’s a playoff contender right there. I‘m excited for Aliyah. Indiana looks like they are invested in their WNBA team and it will pay off in the short term. I bet their games are sellouts everywhere.Okay, maybe a crazy thought, but does Clark really project as a PG in the WNBA? Obviously she's a great passer and has put up big assists numbers. But so did Ionescu, who has been kind of off and on as the PG or 2G as a pro. Probably could say the same about Taurasi long before either of the other two. Ultimately I don't think it really matters, she's a skilled guard who will help her team, just curious about others' thoughts.
I'm with you on getting the ball to Boston and Smith, but Samuelson is going to be a role player with this roster. Getting her a high volume of shots shouldn't be a priority. She might be last among the starters in FGA.I'm not surprised, partly because Caitlin's boyfriend works for one of the pro teams in Indianapolis.
I think the Fever will be quite good, though I'm not sure how many shots Caitlin and Kelsey Mitchell will take. Caitlin has always been fairly efficient, but getting the ball to Boston, Smith, and Lou should be even mores so.
There are quite a few young, talented, charismatic athletes heading to the W. Clark is certainly one of them. I agree that they are likely to increase interest.Let’s all hope she can do for the W what she has done for the Big Ten. Massive increase in anttendance and TV viewership ( with pay raises to follow.)
Her or Vivians should slide in well as the 5th starter. KLS especially is a very good spot up shooter. If they let Clark do her thing and dominate the ball like she's done in Iowa, I'd expect KLS/Vivians percentages to go up significantly, as they'll get much cleaner looks than they're used to in the pros.I'm with you on getting the ball to Boston and Smith, but Samuelson is going to be a role player with this roster. Getting her a high volume of shots shouldn't be a priority. She might be last among the starters in FGA.
Is she? That's certainly her reputation, but as a pro honestly I think she's been pretty average.KLS especially is a very good spot up shooter.
Teams that win Championships in the WNBA usually have more then one person who can run the offense. Seattle had Bird Loyd and Stewie. The Aces have Gray, Plum, and Parker when healthy.I'm not surprised, partly because Caitlin's boyfriend works for one of the pro teams in Indianapolis.
I think the Fever will be quite good, though I'm not sure how many shots Caitlin and Kelsey Mitchell will take. Caitlin has always been fairly efficient, but getting the ball to Boston, Smith, and Lou should be even mores so.
Hopefully, her agent will take into account the attendance and TV viewership increase to command gate receipts and TV revenue....It will be hard to do, but I'd love to see a savvy attorney help negotiate that. My fear too is if that were to happen, will she make adversaries even among her team?Let’s all hope she can do for the W what she has done for the Big Ten. Massive increase in anttendance and TV viewership ( with pay raises to follow.)
I wish her well but let's face reality here. When given the choice between on a mid-season Sunday of grilling and going in the pool or watching WNBA what do you think happens? The WNBA loses. She's a phenomenal talent who's elevated the women's game but reality will set in. You can poo poo this assessment but I don't know how wrong I am.Hopefully, her agent will take into account the attendance and TV viewership increase to command gate receipts and TV revenue....It will be hard to do, but I'd love to see a savvy attorney help negotiate that. My fear too is if that were to happen, will she make adversaries even among her team?
Well yes, but should she not be compensated for being a part of that increase in viewership? Let's be honest, she is the reason women's college basketball viewership is up. It is nice that because of her that other players will benefit, but she's a SUPER star, and thus should be rewarded as one. Caitlin is the GOLD standard.The WNBA's TV deal with ESPN is up in 2025. Most people think the next deal will be significantly bigger, which obviously supports league salaries. If Clark is able to bring more viewership to the WNBA, that will benefit all players.
I imagine a lot of SCar, UConn, and Iowa State fans are happy with this announcement.
I love it that Clark and the beloved former Scar legend Boston will be teammates. Scar fans will be conflicted.
I'm a big fan of Jackson myself and believe her game translates well into the WNBA. Not saying Holmes will, but I wouldn't be surprised she finds a niche at that level.You make valid points and there is never any real way to guess who makes it and who doesn't. I think Jackson has more upside but that's no guarantee either.
I'm far from an expert so I strike my statement those two fine players may not stick in the league.
Hopefully, her agent will take into account the attendance and TV viewership increase to command gate receipts and TV revenue....It will be hard to do, but I'd love to see a savvy attorney help negotiate that. My fear too is if that were to happen, will she make adversaries even among her team?
The WNBA's TV deal with ESPN is up in 2025. Most people think the next deal will be significantly bigger, which obviously supports league salaries. If Clark is able to bring more viewership to the WNBA, that will benefit all players.
Well yes, but should she not be compensated for being a part of that increase in viewership? Let's be honest, she is the reason women's college basketball viewership is up. It is nice that because of her that other players will benefit, but she's a SUPER star, and thus should be rewarded as one. Caitlin is the GOLD standard.
Ok Darren. Why so negative about someone's career choice? Perhaps she's done with college, wants to move on. Competitors will find a way to do so, no matter where they are. As someone with a daughter, wouldn't you want CC to participate in growing the women's game?I wish her well but let's face reality here. When given the choice between on a mid-season Sunday of grilling and going in the pool or watching WNBA what do you think happens? The WNBA loses. She's a phenomenal talent who's elevated the women's game but reality will set in. You can poo poo this assessment but I don't know how wrong I am.
I had two daughters play basketball yet I would have to drag them kicking and screaming to a WNBA game. Not a problem with a UConn game. They were all in. Also, did I not say that I wish her well? There are certain financial constraints to the WNBA and while she may make more money due to endorsements (which she's doing now - thank you State Farm) she's going to have to travel abroad to make the major dollars. That and given when the season is there are plenty of other things for people to do. Right now all eyeballs are on the college game as we're post Super Bowl and pre Opening Day. She's got to major networks (Fox & ESPN) promoting her. When she gets to the next level it'll only be one. That being said, I wish her well and success in her new career.Ok Darren. Why so negative about someone's career choice? Perhaps she's done with college, wants to move on. Competitors will find a way to do so, no matter where they are. As someone with a daughter, wouldn't you want CC to participate in growing the women's game?
Fair points.I had two daughters play basketball yet I would have to drag them kicking and screaming to a WNBA game. Not a problem with a UConn game. They were all in. Also, did I not say that I wish her well? There are certain financial constraints to the WNBA and while she may make more money due to endorsements (which she's doing now - thank you State Farm) she's going to have to travel abroad to make the major dollars. That and given when the season is there are plenty of other things for people to do. Right now all eyeballs are on the college game as we're post Super Bowl and pre Opening Day. She's got to major networks (Fox & ESPN) promoting her. When she gets to the next level it'll only be one. That being said, I wish her well and success in her new career.
She’s reportedly going to get $3m a year from a shoe deal, still keep all of her other sponsors (ball park guess another $1m, could be more when factoring in her exploding social media accounts if more deals are made), plus keep her WNBA salary, merch sales and any other bonuses that come with it. At the end of the day she’s likely making close to $5 million a year without going overseas.I had two daughters play basketball yet I would have to drag them kicking and screaming to a WNBA game. Not a problem with a UConn game. They were all in. Also, did I not say that I wish her well? There are certain financial constraints to the WNBA and while she may make more money due to endorsements (which she's doing now - thank you State Farm) she's going to have to travel abroad to make the major dollars. That and given when the season is there are plenty of other things for people to do. Right now all eyeballs are on the college game as we're post Super Bowl and pre Opening Day. She's got to major networks (Fox & ESPN) promoting her. When she gets to the next level it'll only be one. That being said, I wish her well and success in her new career.
One thing Holmes has that Gustafson didn't coming out of college is that she's a really good defender. Gustafson also having the range Holmes does. She doesn't have a consistent three yet, but she seems to be trying to make a good case to become a stretch four.I think Megan Gustafson is a better comparison as far as playing style. She's bounced around, kind of had to reinvent herself as a player, but I think she's a solid contributor in the W now.