- Joined
- Sep 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,189
- Reaction Score
- 2,493
Wow. you feel very strongly about this to call someone an idiot for using a particular methodology.This methodology is dumb at best. We had this argument last year when this idiot had Houston on the bubble until the beginning of March. If you're going to project teams in the tournament then do it based on performance to date. No cares about who is in if a team loses all the rest of their games which for any decent team is a probability of like 0.00000000000000000001%. Using the Shiz methodology, you might as well just wait for the brackets to come out.
I think his use of "Lock" makes sense. It's the only unbiased way to do it. Otherwise you would have a ton of gray area. Can you lose every game from today until the end and still make it in? Then you are a lock for sure. In two weeks the amount of lock will drastically increase as the season progresses.
Whoever is not a "LOCK" yet at this point but will likely make it to the NCAA tournament is appropriately covered by the "Should be In" category.
--->
I'm just glad to see UCONN up there so early in the season. It feels good to know that even in the theoretical worst case scenario of losing every game there isn't a way to keep us out. No way a committee would keep a 19-13 Big East team out of the NCAA. Its a testament to this great program and how it has returned to the top of the CBB world