nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,709
- Reaction Score
- 34,745
I think picking the bubble will be pretty easy this year for all the amateur and professional bracketologists. There is a big drop off around the 30th at large team, and none of the rest can really complain if they don't get a bid. There are not many non-majors that will earn a bid if they lose in their conference tournament. SD State, UNM, Wichita, BYU, Gonzaga and the Top 5 American schools are locks. A lot would have to happen for ND State, Toledo and Southern Miss to go to the NCAA Tournament without an automatic bid. Green Bay has the win over Virginia, so they have an outside shot if they make their conference title game.
I would not be surprised if the Committee just drew a line and took every team with a 50 RPI or better, leaving out the mid-majors that lost in their conference tournaments. For all the talk about all evaluation the committee does, RPI is the only place to start when selecting a field. The Committee really only tweaks it from there. That would leave about 4-5 bids for everyone else.
The only truly interesting bubble team is Colorado. If you just looked at them objectively based on quality wins, overall record and RPI, you would say they are in great shape for an at-large bid. If you look at them through the perspective of the fact that they lost their best player in early January and have really struggled since then, they are probably not getting in. My gut says the Committee will evaluate the team they have, not the one they had, but the Committee is not consistent on this.
I would not be surprised if the Committee just drew a line and took every team with a 50 RPI or better, leaving out the mid-majors that lost in their conference tournaments. For all the talk about all evaluation the committee does, RPI is the only place to start when selecting a field. The Committee really only tweaks it from there. That would leave about 4-5 bids for everyone else.
The only truly interesting bubble team is Colorado. If you just looked at them objectively based on quality wins, overall record and RPI, you would say they are in great shape for an at-large bid. If you look at them through the perspective of the fact that they lost their best player in early January and have really struggled since then, they are probably not getting in. My gut says the Committee will evaluate the team they have, not the one they had, but the Committee is not consistent on this.