- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 34,050
- Reaction Score
- 99,438
This argument still makes my blood boil. I freaking hate the NCAA.
Pretty sure none of the Huskies who had to sit out a year for APR were part of the reason. Crappy argument there!
This argument still makes my blood boil. I freaking hate the NCAA.
The NCAA didn't give a flying fornication about our guys!Pretty sure none of the Huskies who had to sit out a year for APR were part of the reason. Crappy argument there!
That works the first time around.
Two things you really should not try with the NCAA....
1) Lie to them.
2) Commit a major violation before the ink is dry on the last one.
It’s way too tiring to keep explaining the UNC-NCAA issue. If you don’t think the NCAA wanted to clobber UNC, I don’t know what to tell you.
On Louisville.....NCAA probation is like holding onto a hand grenade. It’s not going to hurt you unless you pull the pin.
Louisville pulled the pin.
Didn’t we already know UL paid for Bowen? Is the $1300 the new piece of evidence? If so, it seems small potatoes when thrown in with the Adidas stuff etc. I’m not holding my breath on a real punishment.
Whether or not we already knew about it, the huge piece of information that came out this week is the timeline of events. Louisville was put on probation by the NCAA and THEN paid a recruit's father. Had they done it before the probation, it wouldn't be as big a deal, but the fact that they handed over cash after they already knew they were under the microscope is the big story here.
I get that, but those people are all fired. I think UL will skate. It would be much harder to go easy on them if they hadn’t already cleaned house. Now, it is the old, “punishing people that didn’t do it” routine. The NCAA will back off.