Breanna's 3 or 2?

[01Neaggrad02]

If Breanna had that as a 3 pointer, UCONN would have held the ball and ND would have had to foul us. I did not see anything that warranted them overturning the 3. Did someone see something I missed?

 

[bruinbball]

I watched a few times as well. In the NFL they would have had to what was called on the floor because the only shot that could have changed it had Dee's head where Breanna's foot was. We also lost 1.9 seconds at the end of the game with the shot clock malfunction. If we get the final bucket or get to OT, it may not be a problem. However, the way it worked out 1.9 more seconds could have helped us try to get a better shot at the end.

 

[Tidepool]

If you are talking about the time when they stopped the clock and went to the replay, then, yes, one camera angle clearly showed Breanna's right foot was on the line. This was the camera angle from more or less underneath our basket. It was a 2-pointer, not a 3.

 

[Harry Mangurian]

If you are talking about the time when they stopped the clock and went to the replay, then, yes, one camera angle clearly showed Breanna's right foot was on the line. This was the camera angle from more or less underneath our basket. It was a 2-pointer, not a 3.

Tidepool, go away. We don't want truth ! We want an excuse.

 

[01Neaggrad02]

I am not looking for an excuse I wanted to know. I do not recall seeing that one. I saw the one where fatheads head was in the way

 

[CCinCT]

If you are talking about the time when they stopped the clock and went to the replay, then, yes, one camera angle clearly showed Breanna's right foot was on the line. This was the camera angle from more or less underneath our basket. It was a 2-pointer, not a 3.

Tidepool correct - one angle did show Breanna's foot on the line