Was the joke you were looking for - “he’s better with his strategy in the courts?”He’s better with his off the court strategy
ExactlyWhat’s inexcusable is sticking to that plan AFTER getting punched in the face.
The most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard a coach say.
Lay off Underwood, this is why they lost:
They got the mojo all wrong
What’s inexcusable is sticking to that plan AFTER getting punched in the face.
Lay off Underwood, this is why they lost:
They got the mojo all wrong
Illinois players did something like this at a press conference. They thought it was funnyWhat is even going on here
The problem with this strategy is that "taking it to" implies initiating the contact. Now, I am not an expert, but I have been told that refs will not blow the whistle if the offensive players are the ones initiating the contact, as long as the defensive players are in a proper defensive stance. This is why (I am guessing) Newton, for example, would drive and get no calls in the BE. The Illinois fans were cursing the refs for all the no calls against Clingan. Well, right strategy but it was not properly done, if what I said about the refs is true. IDK.It was obvious Illinois' game plan was to take it to Clingan and get him in to foul trouble.
Refs were allowing contact. During one of the first half TO's Katz asked Brad about strategy and Brad said they wanted to keep attacking Clingan.
Dumb move not adjusting to refs and game flow.