- Joined
- Apr 24, 2022
- Messages
- 6,503
- Reaction Score
- 38,704
Are you trying to refute someone in the BY? That's a bizarre activity. But, fine. Just to be clear, "deserve" doesn't belong to 'the committee', by definition, or royal grant, or any other sign of authority. Deserts are in the eye of the beholder, as every moral agent anywhere knows. We all get to make sense of the phenomena of Charlie's bracket as we see fit. I offered mine -- in effect, Stanford doesn't seem to me to "deserve a #1 seed. Feel free to offer yours, and please don't feel any obligation to prove anyone else's wrong. I'm sure your opinion will be well-reasoned all by itself.You asked what seeding Stanford and UConn “deserve”, a question whose province, by definition, is the committee's.
You imply that that a win over Maryland should be treated as a win over the #20 team, since that was their AP ranking at the time of the game. But then you'd also have to treat UConn's loss to NC State as a loss to an unranked team, right?