- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction Score
- 155
Can one team really have that much clout? Especially a school that is abysmal in basketball and going downhill fast in football? One would think the ACC would pick schools that would be best for their conference. Syracuse makes sense to me. Pitt did not in the slightest. BC sure is paranoid though. Makes me laugh.
You really believe that? Syracuse delivers nothing in football. They drew the smallest crowd to a USC home game since 2002 in the Coliseum. The ACC was hurting in basketball and this strengthens the basketball side of things for them, not the football side from a competitive standpoint.ACC expansion was all about football, Pitt and Syracuse have better traditions. You can argue the point until you're blue in the face, but it doesnt matter. The ACC consulted with ESPN before the move, if ESPN told the ACC "we want Temple in the ACC," chances are Temple would be in.
You really believe that? Syracuse delivers nothing in football. They drew the smallest crowd to a USC home game since 2002 in the Coliseum. The ACC was hurting in basketball and this strengthens the basketball side of things for them, not the football side from a competitive standpoint.
This is why UMASS should be invited to the Big East. They want to be "The New England team", lets make them second class citizens in their own state. That would be payback.
If this opportunity had been presented to us would we have taken it, absent knowing another Big East power was considering leaving. I wonder. I think that this has very little to do with 'hurt feelings' and everything to do 'turf'.DeFilippo..
“We wanted new playmates and we wanted Eastern playmates,’’ said DeFilippo. “When the Big 12 inquired about Pittsburgh, we asked, ‘Why let them come into our area?’ ’’
Blaudschun...
The first target was Syracuse, which had been on the original ACC expansion list eight years ago. The Orangemen, like BC, were disappointed when they didn’t make the final cut, passed over for Virginia Tech and Miami. The second target was Connecticut, which was part of the Northeast footprint the ACC wanted, and was coming off the daily double of a BCS bid in football and a championship in men’s basketball (the third for Jim Calhoun).
“We didn’t want them in,’’ he said. “It was a matter of turf. We wanted to be the New England team.
’’http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2011/10/09/power_move_by_acc/
They had help from Miami and VT, most of the ACC schools wanted to bring in football teams with more tradition than we have. Basically, the only way we'll get an invite in a year or two is if the football team gets going and starts winning. Bassketball will help us, but it won't save us on its own.
Wow this is damning quote by Swofford:
" ESPN - is the one who told us what to do."
I would tend to agree. Also to say that BC has been in a downward spiral in football and basketball (mens and womens) since joining the ACC is an understatement. UCONN joining the ACC would have mean't BC not winning anything or getting a decent recruit for the next 20 years.This was as much GDF trying to appease an angry BC fanbase as anything. We better hope that the ACC expands to 16 teams soon.
In my humble opinion there is a sad irony here.
1. I think we have been permanently "Penn Stated" as Pitt did to them years ago. Defilippo is staking out New England as BC's ACC franchise. If the shoe were on the other foot, I'd say we would have done the same thing. So unless something changes at BC, the ACC will honor BC's position. And Blaudschen is right as to our long term prospects.
2. Private BCS programs like BC, Duke, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Wake Forest will never win anything. In fact things will get worse for them over time as they try to compete with the big state schools. If ever BC needed a rival, it is now and it is UConn. Syracuse as well.
3. BC and UConn would have both benefited (UConn more so) as natural rivals in the ACC. I give it a very small probability of happening for more reasons than I have time.
BC kind of took themselves down with UConn but they just don't know it yet. But they are far better off as an ACC punching bag than what we are facing.
Two things ... First, Notre Dame is a private school and they are one of the biggest if not THE biggest name brand in college football. Second, BC isn't taking themselves down with this move... if UConn gets reduced to non BCS status (along with RU) but BC has auto BCS conference status where do you think New England and NJ recruits are going to go?