Borges practice box score | The Boneyard

Borges practice box score

Chat GPT actually cooked with this, some of it doesn't add up but maybe that's just Borges's error.

Sure! The tweet gives a very unofficial basketball box score from a scrimmage. The format is typical for a basic box score line:


Player Name – Field Goals Made (FGM) – Free Throws Made-Attempted (FT) – Total Points


But this one condenses the field goals into just total made field goals (not FG attempts), and gives free throws as "made-attempted". Let's break it down player by player:


PlayerFGMFT (M-A)Points
Mullins40-011
Reed64-617
Demary10-02
Stewart20-04
Jay. Ross30-08
Millender20-17
Koroma31-17
Karaban100-026
Ball40-012
Jac. Ross21-15
Furphy20-04


Interpretation Notes:


  • The first number is field goals made, but it's unclear if it includes only 2-pointers or a mix with 3s. The total points often suggest a mix (e.g., Mullins has 4 FGs but 11 points—likely hit a 3 or two).
  • FT made/attempted gives context on scoring efficiency.
  • Jay. Ross and Jac. Ross are likely two different players (e.g., Jayson and Jace Ross or something similar).
 
Chat GPT actually cooked with this, some of it doesn't add up but maybe that's just Borges's error.

Sure! The tweet gives a very unofficial basketball box score from a scrimmage. The format is typical for a basic box score line:


Player Name – Field Goals Made (FGM) – Free Throws Made-Attempted (FT) – Total Points


But this one condenses the field goals into just total made field goals (not FG attempts), and gives free throws as "made-attempted". Let's break it down player by player:


PlayerFGMFT (M-A)Points
Mullins40-011
Reed64-617
Demary10-02
Stewart20-04
Jay. Ross30-08
Millender20-17
Koroma31-17
Karaban100-026
Ball40-012
Jac. Ross21-15
Furphy20-04


Interpretation Notes:


  • The first number is field goals made, but it's unclear if it includes only 2-pointers or a mix with 3s. The total points often suggest a mix (e.g., Mullins has 4 FGs but 11 points—likely hit a 3 or two).
  • FT made/attempted gives context on scoring efficiency.
  • Jay. Ross and Jac. Ross are likely two different players (e.g., Jayson and Jace Ross or something similar).
Three 3's for Mullins based on the math. Would also suggest Tarris nailed a three. Ross had 2. Millender's number make no sense, so something is screwy here.

Top 4 scorers are who'd you hope for, exception being Demary. We need him to be great. Who was guarding Tarris?
 
Dan saying they hope social media isn't hammering kids who didn't play well this early, caused them a lot of angst last year? C'mon.
 
Millender somehow got 7 points out of two made FG's and no free throws. These guys playing with a 4pt logo shot?
Dan Cortese Rock n Jock style

images (1).jpeg
 
Why can't Borges just be a normal person and release the stats like they normally show up.
I imagine Borges to be one of these old school reporters who would have been wearing a gentleman's cap and smoking a cigarette in the 20's while taking his notes. Today he's probably taking all his notes in with a number 2 pencil on the back of a white bag that his bacon/egg/cheese came in.
 
Pretty much tracks what most of us have assumed re: starting lineups/rotations/strengths and weaknesses right?

Really the only starting spot up in the air is the 3, and whomever loses out on that one is first man off the bench. One of Stewart/Ross hopefully breaks through and either starts or gets major minutes. Furphy potentially in play for rotation but likely not major minutes this year. Reed needs to stay healthy out of foul trouble as much as humanly possible for this team to reach ceiling.
 

Online statistics

Members online
46
Guests online
1,760
Total visitors
1,806

Forum statistics

Threads
163,960
Messages
4,376,756
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom