Everyone in this thread is forgetting that Boise State is not nearly as quick or deep a team as UCF is. Against UCF Pindell had several nice runs but was eventually run down, against Boise I'm thinking he breaks two or three for huge gains or TD's. Same for Mensah and the other running backs, as well as Dixon on kick offs and punts. My big worry is Boise trying to pick apart the secondary, but again this is where Boise is again slower against our pass rush than UCF was. Boise's OL is big but slow, which means we need to take risks with single coverage and blitz on occasion to keep them honest. If blitzing works, at worst we get a sack at best a throw attempt under pressure results in a pick or QB fumble. If Crocker remains Crocker we're screwed, if he realizes he needs to take some risks, then we can play them toe to toe. Boise by 7 at the half, final score Boise 34 UConn 27. If we didn't learn anything from last week then 56-21.There's only one way to look at this game, and I hope it is exactly the way that the UConn football team is looking at it. Nobody expects them to win, which means they have nothing to lose. They are playing with house money in this game.
Furthermore, if they were to win the game, it would be season-defining. It would turn our fortunes around in one night. So let's go punche them in the potato-growing mouths...
Everyone in this thread is forgetting that Boise State is not nearly as quick or deep a team as UCF is. Against UCF Pindell had several nice runs but was eventually run down, against Boise I'm thinking he breaks two or three for huge gains or TD's. Same for Mensah and the other running backs, as well as Dixon on kick offs and punts. My big worry is Boise trying to pick apart the secondary, but again this is where Boise is again slower against our pass rush than UCF was. Boise's OL is big but slow, which means we need to take risks with single coverage and blitz on occasion to keep them honest. If blitzing works, at worst we get a sack at best a throw attempt under pressure results in a pick or QB fumble. If Crocker remains Crocker we're screwed, if he realizes he needs to take some risks, then we can play them toe to toe. Boise by 7 at the half, final score Boise 34 UConn 27. If we didn't learn anything from last week then 56-21.
Contrary to the opinions of the inveterate doubters, I like my chances with UConn at +33.5. A lot.
Not sure what the real problem is here. It’s a simple educated guess by Vegas that’s taking into account the youth across the board with UConn and how they played defensively against UCF. The only true problem is if those kids in that locker room approach this game feeling like doom and gloom.You don’t really get the point. Covering 33.5 is essentially a coinflip. The problem is being 33.5 underdogs.
Putting your faith on the line for this? I’m beginning to think you’re Chief Bot 3.0 and I’m interacting in a message board equivalant to Westworld.I’m going to make a Nostical statement here—I’m so confident we will lose and not hit the spread, that I will drop out of seminary and become an atheist if we cover
The other problem is the doubters have a way better record.You don’t really get the point. Covering 33.5 is essentially a coinflip. The problem is being 33.5 underdogs.
FWIW, Troy closed +8.5 at home vs Boise (so figure +14.5 @ Boise).
Granted, it’s not apples to apples — it was the first game, no one had seen anything, etc. But let that sink in — Troy was +8.5 and we are +33.5.
Troy is a legit G5 team this year. I get that they aren’t a big name but they were expected to compete vs Boise. Lots of those sun belt teams are good this year...arky state and UAB should also be good
Crocker isn't Crocker only if Edsall tells him otherwise, which probably has happened already."If Crocker remains Crocker, we're screwed..."
I almost choked on my a.m. coffee when I read that.
Sadly, I'm afraid he will, which means we're gonna get Crockered.
I’m going to make a Nostical statement here—I’m so confident we will lose and not hit the spread, that I will drop out of seminary and become an atheist if we cover
A good fan doesn't go around predicting his team is going to get crushed. Let the haters kill your team.
There's only one way to look at this game, and I hope it is exactly the way that the UConn football team is looking at it. Nobody expects them to win, which means they have nothing to lose. They are playing with house money in this game.
Furthermore, if they were to win the game, it would be season-defining. It would turn our fortunes around in one night. So let's go punche them in the potato-growing mouths...
Winning this game would be PROGRAM-defining. Pindell would have to run for throw for 250 and run for 250 in order to pull it off, and it would still be close.
Everyone in this thread is forgetting that Boise State is not nearly as quick or deep a team as UCF is. Against UCF Pindell had several nice runs but was eventually run down, against Boise I'm thinking he breaks two or three for huge gains or TD's. Same for Mensah and the other running backs, as well as Dixon on kick offs and punts. My big worry is Boise trying to pick apart the secondary, but again this is where Boise is again slower against our pass rush than UCF was. Boise's OL is big but slow, which means we need to take risks with single coverage and blitz on occasion to keep them honest. If blitzing works, at worst we get a sack at best a throw attempt under pressure results in a pick or QB fumble. If Crocker remains Crocker we're screwed, if he realizes he needs to take some risks, then we can play them toe to toe. Boise by 7 at the half, final score Boise 34 UConn 27. If we didn't learn anything from last week then 56-21.