Blue Blood - does Florida qualify?

[John]

I’m begging you to stop saying “chip.”

100%. People should be auto-banned for a predetermined amount of time for every use.

 

[bendm]

100%. People should be auto-banned for a predetermined amount of time for every use.

Ok I’ll call them Nattys instead

 

[TheChamps990411]

Kansas is the gatekeeper with 4. Tie them and youre in the discusssion, surpass them and youre in. It makes sense in my mind so dont ask.

 

[bendm]

Kansas is the gatekeeper with 4. Tie them and youre in the discusssion, surpass them and youre in. It makes sense in my mind so dont ask.

Idk KU was still a blue blood with 3. We tied them in 2011 and passed them in 2014 (Then they tied us in 2022) yet we didn’t become a BB until we got 6 in 2024. Rigged.

 

[Lafayette]

Duke does have UNC/UCLA/Kentucky history to them as long as you're not strictly talking about titles. "Some final fours" is a funny way of saying 8 final fours before 1991 (which is still more than UConn has as a program now). They literally lost to UCLA and UK in title games in the 60s and 70s. They have more wins overall as a program than UCLA. UConn has like 500 less. They're 5th in tournament appearances, and the ones above them are all the names you'd expect (UK, Kansas, UCLA, UNC). They were anointed without fanfare because they already fit all the aspects. We're 14th in bids. They're 4th in Sweet 16s (UK, UNC, UCLA, then them), we're 12th.

Duke is a private school - the economics change the funding formulas.

 

[HuskyHawk]

We really need to stop caring about this. Florida is easily a top 10 program in the modern era.

I will grant some respect to teams that were good back in the early days, good most of the time since and are still good now, but that's really only Kansas, Kentucky and North Carolina. Duke has a fair case as well as @auror points out. Some teams with history, like the orange Canadians, haven't maintained success. Nor has UCLA or Indiana.