Did you give this any thought before that response? Did you consider the fact that women's basketball is UConn's premier program now and for the foreseeable future? That Geno is the premier coach in the country? Do you really think that Herbst and Manuel see the program as insignificant, even if women's basketball generally, outside of UConn, is insignificant?
How long would the program stay at the top in a league that absolutely sucks? Three or four years if we are lucky.
I'd be careful throwing stones because of academic performance. Our disiplinary history isn't the greatest either.What does UConn have in common with a bunch of small Catholics? Superior academics? Schools like PC and St. John's show absolutely no compunction in taking on at-risk players.
I'd be careful throwing stones because of academic performance. Our disiplinary history isn't the greatest either.
i understand that attendance is a function of success and competition. we have two potential top 10 teams coming in along with a top 25 in rutgers. sdsu is an unknown.Don't act like that is because of anything this administration has done. You might as well throw the 2013 attendance record right out the window. Ticket sales will be at an all time high solely because of the Michigan game. Don't fool yourself into thinking things are getting better. After we get waxed this year and miss another bowl game we will be lucky to have 20k in the stands for 2014.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
who's 'we'? why did he correct himself to say 'I'?And once again, I die just a little inside.
wbb is different. there is such a gap between the top programs i dont think conferences are as vital.Did you give this any thought before that response? Did you consider the fact that women's basketball is UConn's premier program now and for the foreseeable future? That Geno is the premier coach in the country? Do you really think that Herbst and Manuel see the program as insignificant, even if women's basketball generally, outside of UConn, is insignificant?
How long would the program stay at the top in a league that absolutely sucks? Three or four years if we are lucky.
Actually, there are FOUR conferences with two teams in the top 10: BE, UConn and ND; ACC, Duke and MD; SEC, Tenn and Kentucky, and Pac 12, Stanford and Cal.wbb is different. there is such a gap between the top programs i dont think conferences are as vital.
the top teams alwaysseem to play each other: stanford, tenn, nd, baylor more recently.
outside of uconn and nd, does any other league have more than one top 10 team?
I think and Dude r better sources than Blaud
i understand that attendance is a function of success and competition. we have two potential top 10 teams coming in along with a top 25 in rutgers. sdsu is an unknown.
our attendance will go up...
you can debate 'why' all you want, but in the end its the number that counts.
ps... i havent seen next season yet. are you one of those who yells out whats going to happen in theaters as wel?
I think conference strength is just as important in WBB as in men's. When ND goes to the ACC, UConn will lose the only conference rival that has been a challenge in the last 4-5 years.
What?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
you mean like 'success'...I think he's talking about next season specifically - Michigan and Louisville.
The why matters. If people show up to see the team you are playing - when you aren't playing them anymore it gets ugly fast.
you mean like 'success'...
Thanks for cluing me in.
it's amazing what winning can do...You can't have real success in CUSA 2.0. Beating a bunch of third rate programs like Temple, Tulane and Memphis isn't going to get anyone excited.
There is no rosy picture for UCONN FB right now. I simply feel we have to grab the best scenario going forward and I hope it includes the C7 for our overall success.
I actually think there might be an internal game going on here. In fact I think this is a lot more likely than some of the other theories like that this is a shot across the bow of the NBA on a grant of rights or that it is some kind of mis-direction. I suspect that there are some within the UConn administration and especially among the alumni/supporter community that just can't fathom the idea that basketball will be stuck in a mid-major conference and are trying to push the issue. Of course they miss the fact that it isn't 1984 any more and St Johns basically stinks, Providence stinks, Depaul is awful, Seton Hall is a joke and Al Maguire retired from Marquette in 1978...Plus I suspect there is still some upset that they didn't get their guy as the AD.Whats an interesting sidebar to me is that there seems to be a split between big ego Warde and others in power or who have influence at UConn. While Warde will go to games at exotic locations he isn't foremost an AD with a basketball interest - he is a football guy at a mediocre level. While the Catholic league is not perfect it beats current alternatives for basketball and the things we all want appear to be a reach given the current people in power networks, influence, effectiveness and work ethic.
You can't have real success in CUSA 2.0. Beating a bunch of third rate programs like Temple, Tulane and Memphis isn't going to get anyone excited.
PredergastWho was there guy for AD?
So you are saying that the conference situation is bad. Interesting.
President Herbst reaffirms today that UConn is committed to moving forward with fine like minded universities such as Temple, Memphis and Houston. She says I should be happy about it![]()
President Herbst reaffirms today that UConn is committed to moving forward with fine like minded universities such as Temple, Memphis and Houston. She says I should be happy about it![]()
I actually think there might be an internal game going on here. In fact I think this is a lot more likely than some of the other theories like that this is a shot across the bow of the NBA on a grant of rights or that it is some kind of mis-direction. I suspect that there are some within the UConn administration and especially among the alumni/supporter community that just can't fathom the idea that basketball will be stuck in a mid-major conference and are trying to push the issue. Of course they miss the fact that it isn't 1984 any more and St Johns basically stinks, Providence stinks, Depaul is awful, Seton Hall is a joke and Al Maguire retired from Marquette in 1978...Plus I suspect there is still some upset that they didn't get their guy as the AD.
I used to think that independence in football was a stupid idea. That was until I saw the number being tossed around for the C7 TV deal. Now I feel that if we can't make more money in the nbe than in the C7 we just need to go with them and do whatever it takes. If we can play football with the nbe or mwc, fine. mac and cusa aren't options. If we have to be independent, then so be it. Our football schedule really can't get much worse than it will be in the nbe and at least our hoops schedule would consist of many of our traditional rivals and some other good programs.
UConn has to do what's best for UConn overall. We can't kill the basketball program just to keep football in a mediocre conference. Assuming the C7 would even entertain our membership, I think we really need to go for it. They would know that we would leave when we got an invite from a power conference and I'm sure we could work provisions for that into our contract.
I think that UConn and Cincy would also be helpful in procuring the Big East name, tournament credits, exit fees, and facilitating an exit for next season.
I don't know, I look at the top 25 in bball today and at least the C7 has Marquette(25). Butler and VCU have been mentioned as additions, that would give them two more. No NBE teams to be found. It probably won't happen but my choice would be to play football in the NBE or MWC and keep all other sports with the C7.