Bigger improvement.. from 1st to 2nd year or 2nd to 3rd? | The Boneyard

Bigger improvement.. from 1st to 2nd year or 2nd to 3rd?

Mike Honcho

I've lost count of titles
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,510
Reaction Score
9,198
We've talked a ton about relying on our sophomore class this year, but I had it in my mind that most college stars had bigger improvements from year 2 to year 3. After doing some analysis, I found that the data doesn't really support that. Kemba's AA season was his third and final season, and while his PPG increased dramatically (14.6 to 23.5), his shooting splits and rebounds, assists, steals were all pretty similar. Same with Caron... his PPG increased from 17 to 25.1, but everything else was pretty similar (other than blocks, which went from 2.1 to 3.3).

Obviously a lot of this is how you break down the data, and percentage increases are always going to overvalue bigger deltas, which are easier when your freshman year stats suck.

Here's what I did and didn't do.
  1. I did not normalize the stats per 40 minutes. This probably could have helped address the earlier downside I mentioned about percentage changes.
  2. I did not take a player's usage into account. Typically that affects shooting percentages.
  3. I did pull a ton of data from our stars over the Calhoun/KO/Hurley years.
    • That's 18 players (in chronological order... Donyell, Ray, Khalid, Rip, Caron, Emeka, Ben, Charlie, Rudy, Hasheem, Kemba, Boat, Shabazz, Jalen, Andre, Adama, Jordan, Donovan)
  4. I did not pull data for stars who transferred in (e.g. Tristen).
  5. I ended up removing the three 2-and-done guys from the analysis (Charlie, Rudy, Jordan, Donovan). That left 14 players.
  6. There were only 3 players who stayed the full four years (Boat, Bazz, Jalen), so I'm not presenting the 3->4 year changes.

Anyways, the point is less about the data, and more about development expectations, especially given our sophomore class. My judgment after running this analysis is that the expectations are fair -- and that stardom is usually revealed between freshman and sophomore years. Hilton Armstrongs are seemingly pretty rare.

UConn_Players_-_Percentage_Changes.jpg


Happy to share the data with anyone interested. Hat tip to sports-reference.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
5,802
Reaction Score
19,069
The jump from sophomore to junior years aren’t typically stat related but moreso knowing how to win and have more control over the game.

Guys like Kemba and Shabazz produced a lot of great stats their sophomore year. They didn’t know how to win and run a team at a high level until their third years.

But those kind of leaps may be hard to quantify with data.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,413
Reaction Score
14,135
I think a lot depends how much PT the player gets as a Freshman, but I haven't looked at any of the data. Lots of players need time for the game to slow down for them.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,939
Reaction Score
35,363
I am not sure what the data will tell you if you increase the sample size beyond the stars. Kevin Ollie made a big leap his third year. Marcus Williams should be included. Fair and Tony Robertson saw their usage go down as Calhoun brought in better talent behind them. Voskuhl and Knight were multi year starters that made the NBA. Stanley Robertson and Gavin Edwards were multi-year starters. Omar Calhoun’s stats got worse.

The sample makes a big difference.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
1,059
Reaction Score
5,331
So many variables in all of this. Was a player like Karaban getting the 4th and 5th best defender in his first two seasons and now he's seeing the other teams #1 or #2?
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,353
Reaction Score
72,609

All improvement needs to be taken with volume and usage in context.
 

Online statistics

Members online
357
Guests online
1,863
Total visitors
2,220

Forum statistics

Threads
161,095
Messages
4,250,610
Members
10,096
Latest member
DRF


.
Top Bottom