- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,907
- Reaction Score
- 11,050
The only one that profits in a lawsuit is the lawyers. .
Again, can we all please stop saying that like it is a bad thing!
The only one that profits in a lawsuit is the lawyers. .
Again, can we all please stop saying that like it is a bad thing!
The only one that profits in a lawsuit is the lawyers. The BE has no suit against Pitt and Cuse if they followed established bylaws and procedures. A suit against ESPN? Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. A comparable TV deal was in front of the BE already and it was rejected by the whole BE. Now the conference composition is changed. If ESPN feels that future BE composition is not comparable to the prior BE in terms of TV eyeballs and ratings, they will be able to prove their case for a lower contract very easily. If the BE argument is collusion, very hard to prove especially if you have 11 ACC presidnets all on the stand saying the same thing and no paper trail to prove it. A giant waste of money. If the BB's are leading the legal charge, Uconn needs to be real careful about having their expressed desire to be in another conference coming back to bite them. I am sure some lawyer could argue that Uconn's public statements are undermining the ability of the BE to rebuild itself/expand with the best possible teams. I'm not saying its right, but if someone is in a suing mood, everyone should duck and cover.
So let's see....
No one wants to increase the exit fees and there could be a legal mess.
Yup....the Big East has great potential. Count my school in while I go looking for Jeff Hathaway at the unemployment office.