Big East addresses officiating | The Boneyard

Big East addresses officiating

Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
102
Reaction Score
452
I don't see any mention of expectations from the officials themselves or of a goal from the participant leagues of consistent calls and consistent interpretation of the rules and a feedback process to the officials. Having a process in place to promote consistency and fairness would go a long way in fans perception of what is going on.

What I read sounds like a grammar school objective of not hurting their feelings when they make obvious bad calls.
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
1,119
Reaction Score
6,224
Seems over-excessive. These refs are grown men and know what they sign up for.

Looks like not everyone's strong enough to face the wrath of Hurley.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,898
Reaction Score
12,824
Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.

Yup... people have been having conniptions about the "freedom of movement" bs all year. We hold and bump, too. BE officials don't call it. Once we get the tourney, those might get called. But let's not act like we're constantly facing Glavine and Maddux and not getting the outside corner call. And 99% of the fouls that are called on us is because we are collectively terrible defensively.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,160
Reaction Score
6,305
Seems over-excessive. These refs are grown men and know what they sign up for.

Looks like not everyone's strong enough to face the wrath of Hurley.
Pretty sure the issue is not Hurley or other coaches but fans on social media who take it too far. It is a fact that less people are becoming refs at the lower levels because the pay is not worth dealing with all the BS that comes along with it.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
790
Reaction Score
4,023
Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.
This isn't true.

Calling touch falls when driving and ignoring holding players without the ball equally on the both sides impacts the game and unfairly can unfairly bias the outcome of the game (see every UConn Big East game).

These decisions are not neutral to the outcome of the game.

Don't get me started on how this impacts big football games.
 
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
3,434
Reaction Score
17,571
Pretty sure the issue is not Hurley or other coaches but fans on social media who take it too far. It is a fact that less people are becoming refs at the lower levels because the pay is not worth dealing with all the BS that comes along with it.
There’s a difference between youth level refs and collegiate/pro. I think I read a high level college basketball ref makes 4K per game. Not saying the initiative is bad itself but to not address the poor officiating at the league level is dumb too. The Big 12 responded to poor officiating over the weekend.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
4,709
Reaction Score
59,900
I don't see any mention of expectations from the officials themselves or of a goal from the participant leagues of consistent calls and consistent interpretation of the rules and a feedback process to the officials. Having a process in place to promote consistency and fairness would go a long way in fans perception of what is going on.

What I read sounds like a grammar school objective of not hurting their feelings when they make obvious bad calls.
Coaches have mentioned before they do have a contact with the Big East to express concerns about officiating, but as best I can tell all I have ever heard materialize from these discussions is this individual will basically confirm or disagree with the grievance. I have yet to hear anything tangible comes out of those discussions when coaches do have fair complaints. And that's the problem.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
13,039
Reaction Score
22,391
Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.
I think this is right in theory but everyone in every sport knows that officials don’t and likely never will make calls in the final seconds that they will always make in the first ones. Beyond that calls are made for specific reasons. How many times have we all seen refs start calling games tighter if it looks like things are getting very chippy? A good official knows how to keep a game under control and how to get it back when it gets out of control.

Frankly I hope part of this is Big East refs learn to call fouls based on the rules and stop playing to the “rough tough” New Big East nonsense. When you watch other leagues, play is much less about subway mugging and more about the beauty of a free flowing game. Even Hurley commented that his system is more effective in the NCAA tournament because the do call fouls for clutching and grabbing and holding.
 

ColchVEGAS

Still buckin like five, deuce, four, trey.
Joined
Apr 13, 2018
Messages
972
Reaction Score
3,276
@freescooter. I agree and do not at the same time. As much as I hate seeing a call in the last seconds to decide a game, I hate seeing how the game is called changed from half to half even more.

Like you said I get why they do it, to regain control if things are getting chippy, but it ultimately destroys the flow of the game after the teams have adjusted to what is being called and what is not.

I can live with "bad" calls as long as those said "bad" calls stay the same on both ends.
 

temery

What?
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
21,343
Reaction Score
43,745
Seems over-excessive. These refs are grown men and know what they sign up for.

Looks like not everyone's strong enough to face the wrath of Hurley.

Hurley's wrath is a problem, not a solution. There are crappy refs. There are biased refs. There are refs who hate vanilla ice cream and anchovies on pizza. But there is no conspiracy among refs to screw UConn, and there is no ref on this planet who hates UConn but decides to call a fair game because he's afraid of Hurley's wrath.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
36,274
Reaction Score
34,605
This isn't true.

Calling touch falls when driving and ignoring holding players without the ball equally on the both sides impacts the game and unfairly can unfairly bias the outcome of the game (see every UConn Big East game).

These decisions are not neutral to the outcome of the game.

Don't get me started on how this impacts big football games.
Pretty sure you missed the point. Nothing was bothsided.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,486
Reaction Score
9,904
Are we really all that interested in retention of officials?

Or should we be more interested in the actual removal of obviously bad officials?
Issue is whether there are good ones ready to replace.

Perhaps incentivizing with awards/recognitions or bonus’ could help motivate.
 

Online statistics

Members online
342
Guests online
2,142
Total visitors
2,484

Forum statistics

Threads
161,207
Messages
4,254,700
Members
10,097
Latest member
Hillside


.
Top Bottom