- Joined
- May 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,434
- Reaction Score
- 17,571
Not the way you’d think though lol
Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.
Pretty sure the issue is not Hurley or other coaches but fans on social media who take it too far. It is a fact that less people are becoming refs at the lower levels because the pay is not worth dealing with all the BS that comes along with it.Seems over-excessive. These refs are grown men and know what they sign up for.
Looks like not everyone's strong enough to face the wrath of Hurley.
This isn't true.Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.
There’s a difference between youth level refs and collegiate/pro. I think I read a high level college basketball ref makes 4K per game. Not saying the initiative is bad itself but to not address the poor officiating at the league level is dumb too. The Big 12 responded to poor officiating over the weekend.Pretty sure the issue is not Hurley or other coaches but fans on social media who take it too far. It is a fact that less people are becoming refs at the lower levels because the pay is not worth dealing with all the BS that comes along with it.
Coaches have mentioned before they do have a contact with the Big East to express concerns about officiating, but as best I can tell all I have ever heard materialize from these discussions is this individual will basically confirm or disagree with the grievance. I have yet to hear anything tangible comes out of those discussions when coaches do have fair complaints. And that's the problem.I don't see any mention of expectations from the officials themselves or of a goal from the participant leagues of consistent calls and consistent interpretation of the rules and a feedback process to the officials. Having a process in place to promote consistency and fairness would go a long way in fans perception of what is going on.
What I read sounds like a grammar school objective of not hurting their feelings when they make obvious bad calls.
I think this is right in theory but everyone in every sport knows that officials don’t and likely never will make calls in the final seconds that they will always make in the first ones. Beyond that calls are made for specific reasons. How many times have we all seen refs start calling games tighter if it looks like things are getting very chippy? A good official knows how to keep a game under control and how to get it back when it gets out of control.Consistency is the only thing that matters in regards to officiating. A foul on one end of the floor is a foul on the other end. A call made in the first minute should be the same call made in last minute.
Seems over-excessive. These refs are grown men and know what they sign up for.
Looks like not everyone's strong enough to face the wrath of Hurley.
Pretty sure you missed the point. Nothing was bothsided.This isn't true.
Calling touch falls when driving and ignoring holding players without the ball equally on the both sides impacts the game and unfairly can unfairly bias the outcome of the game (see every UConn Big East game).
These decisions are not neutral to the outcome of the game.
Don't get me started on how this impacts big football games.
Issue is whether there are good ones ready to replace.Are we really all that interested in retention of officials?
Or should we be more interested in the actual removal of obviously bad officials?