nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,185
- Reaction Score
- 36,209
You need me to pretend I'm younger than I am?
I'll make you a deal -- the first time that a power conference adds a school to its football league for primarily basketball reasons, I will compliment you for being ahead of trends. (Because I'm a boomer, as I've said for years I don't plan on seeing that day unless the NCAA stops funding itself and its subsidies for member schools solely through hoops but makes football pay its share). Until then, however, please quit pretending that you thinking something new will happen in the future is the same as it actually having happened.
Just saying something like "football drives the bus" is true because it is conventional wisdom does not mean it is true. Other than Nebraska to the Big 10 and Virginia Tech to the ACC, I can't think of a single conference move that occurred in the last 30 plus years that happened because of football. Virtually all conference moves occurred because of TV markets. That is why the SEC added dry wells like South Carolina, Arkansas, and Missouri, and the Big 10 added Rutgers and Maryland. Neither league cared whether any of those programs was ever any good, which is a good thing for the Big 10 and SEC, because all five programs have sucked for the most part in their new leagues.