Best Husky team of all time

[Dutch Boyd]

The 04 team was slightly better but the 99 team was more consistent. The 99 team would of won that matchup at UNC in 04 witch still pisses me off!

 

[CONN78SEJ]

What you said in the bold is true and the 99 team, although very talented in terms of college talent and pro talent (3 players drafted to NBA), it was greater than the sum of the individual players. I don't think there is a clear cut answer per se, both the 99 and 04 teams were excellent teams that produced banner years.

One thing clear cut, in my view, is the 99 team was a better defensive team.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

Supposedly, there was a huge collison in practice between Boone and Hilton. So neither was 100% for the Mason game.

I remember hearing that also.

 

[businesslawyer]

04 team, if healthy, wins.

With Okafor limited they lost a few games. Imagine 99 without Rip for several games. Do they win as many as they won?

As for the F4 game against Duke and falling behind, 2 quick fouls made Okafor sit.

Okafor really was POY over Jameer Nelson that year, and although they had many other good players on the team, Okafor was the dominant factor.

The ‘99 team beat a top 5 at the time Stamford team, on the road rather handily without Rip. Just saying.

 

[Jaydumo20]

2001 Miami (FL) Hurricanes Roster | College Football at Sports-Reference.com

2001 Miami (FL) Hurricanes Roster

www.sports-reference.com

I always thought the 04 was so loaded it was almost improbable. Not as improbable as this team. The 01 Hurricanes FB is laughably rich. Top to bottom. I know it's a different school and sport but it's always worth a mention when talking about stacked squads