Invoking Nelson's "Paul Newman Rule" here. If it's a Coen Bros. movie, it is assumed to be good. It is only surprising when it's bad (Barton Fink, I'm looking at you.)
Fair enough, but this one was so offbeat that I figured it might be some sort of exception. An allegory and modern take on The Odyssey is ambitious to say the least.
Something to remember. There is usually a distinction between movies made for a mainstream audience, and those films with art house/independent origins. Also important to remember that just because a movie has art/house or independent origins, it is not necessarily a cult movie or one with a cult following. The Coen Brothers are an interesting case, as they have tended to straddle the cult line, especially in their earlier days. No question that The Big Lebowski deserves its cult status. However, I disagree about the idea of "Oh Brother" being a cult movie. I will say that it is probably my favorite Coen Brothers production. Anyway, "Oh Brother is odd without being really all that weird, at least for the Coen Brothers. Remember, it also stars George Clooney at a time where he was close to the height of his popularity, which makes it a hard sell for me as far as giving it cult status. This movie also greatly raised the profile of bluegrass/Americana music, something you don't expect cult movies to do. As far as it being an allegory for The Odyssey, that shows more of its art house roots than anything cultish.
Last edited: