I'm in agreement with your top 3.
Mulkey and Walz belong in the top 10 for sure.
There are 3 ignored groups, and I find it difficult to find that the other 5 listed can be proven to be better (obviously, it is all in criteria and personal liking), but -
- The long time coaches like Landers, Hatchell, CVS and even Fennelly have had relative success over a very long time. What differentiates Coale, Staley and Washington from them?
- The folks that toil at the somewhat lower levels to great success - for example, Bryan Georgis, Insell, others. I'm not convinced that one could claim them as top 10, but how do you judge them since their success has been at a level that won't get them to the Final 4.
- Coaches like Mitchell and McCallie, regardless of whether you like or don't like them, how do you differentiate Coale, Staley and Washington from them?
As to Frese, meh. Ultimately, if you hold the head coach responsible for the teams success, you would have to include her as a potential top 10. Blair is a unique case; he started late and he is in some ways a fine coach. Career wise, however, except for the NC which even he would acknowledge was helped by Vic Schaeffer, his Associate Head Coach, I'm not sure he has differentiated himself from the other candidates whose names I raised.