With Calhoun's ability to flat out coach, it he were getting the quality of players that K keeps getting, we'd have 8 championships right now.
I don't agree at all. He developed wonderful game plans and most of them worked to perfection but he is far from a great game coach, making adjustments on the fly. It wasn't a part of his DNA. There was also his Irish stubbornness when he often refused to bend. Maybe that has more to do with my and other's impressions that he wasn't a good game coach. He stayed locked into his pregame mindset and that was it, win or lose! Not to say he would lose gracefully because he's always had a lot of passion.Can't believe you don't think he was a good game coach. Jim was the best game coach I ever saw. He consistently controlled games better than other coaches. Krzyzewski is not half the game coach Calhoun is, and he's proved it time and again against Dook. The 99 Championship was a masterpiece, even to the point where he put Klaiber in for a couple of minutes in the first half to make the point that we weren't afraid of them. Doubling down on Brand totally controlled the paint. And Ricky and Khalid were just quicker and better and he exploited that. With Calhoun's ability to flat out coach, it he were getting the quality of players that K keeps getting, we'd have 8 championships right now.
2012 vs Warde Manuel -- not only picked the right man to replace himself, by the timing of his retirement, he pretty much forced Manuel to go with his choice. One little bit of strategy that has won, and will win us, who knows how many more games (and chamionships).
1999 vs Duke -- The double bigs was crucial, but switching Ricky between Langdon and Avery on a per posession, situational basis late in the game was stunning.
1992 vs LSU -- Totally nullifying Shaq.
For those who do not believe that JC was a great game coach, which coach from the past 35+ years would you put ahead of him?
Calhoun coached the Kentucky 2014 game?
1999 Duke. Elton Brand looked like he had no idea that a big to big double was even legal.
For those who do not believe that JC was a great game coach, which coach from the past 35+ years would you put ahead of him?
Dook 2004 Tourney game required intensive player management with Okafor in foul trouble. The comeback was marvelous!
If Calhoun was the greatest coach in coaching history at everything, he would have been undefeated. Can we have a thread on this board where someone makes an honest criticism of something UConn and people don't feel the need to have a "who is the greatest UConn fan" contest?
Call me crazy, but I think Jim Calhoun was a great game coach.
He knew how to make adjustments, how to fire up his players, and how to work the refs. We were always a good second-half team.
Nobody's perfect for chrissakes.
He didn't just "develop players" and throw them out there.
Chronologically
1988 NIT final vs Ohio St
1990 BET semifinal & final
1992 NCAA vs LSU
1999 vs Duke
2004 vs Duke
2010 (10-11) Maui - entire tournament
2011 BET
2011 NCAAs
If Calhoun was the greatest coach in coaching history at everything, he would have been undefeated. Can we have a thread on this board where someone makes an honest criticism of something UConn and people don't feel the need to have a "who is the greatest UConn fan" contest?
Corollary to the other thread. I think Calhoun was a good, not great game coach by top coach standards. Calhoun is in the Hall of Fame because he developed players better than any coach that has ever lived, but he has had some moments as a game coach.
1) Maryland 2002 - Yes, UConn lost, but I think Calhoun squeezed every ounce out of this team, and almost took down the eventual national champion. Every move he made was right in this game. I thought sitting Butler was the right move, and he dialed Okafor back enough on that tub of lard Baxter to compensate for the refs treating Baxter like he was Karl Malone. Blake misses that 3 with 25 seconds left and I think a team who's second best player is Johnnie Selvie goes to the Final Four.
2) San Diego State 2011 - one of the best coached basketball games by both coaches I think I had seen until Michigan State/UConn 2014.
3) Duke 1999 and Kentucky 2014 - I put these in the same bucket. For all the accolades of the big/big double teams on Brand, UConn won the 1999 game the same way it won the 2014 game, by dominating the other team's guards defensively. Calhoun had a huge speed advantage on the perimeter, and he stepped on the other teams' throat with it. I put the Langdon travel in the same category at the Harrison untouched backcourt. The other team was so intimidated by UConn's speed that skilled players made mistakes they would never have made otherwise.
Others?
I tended to agree with you but I was most probably wrong. Calhoun had a way of seeing the big picture in a game and some moves that seemed strange ended up with a win. We are not privy as to who may have a sore knee and its not talked about for obvious reasons.Corollary to the other thread. I think Calhoun was a good, not great game coach by top coach standards. Calhoun is in the Hall of Fame because he developed players better than any coach that has ever lived, but he has had some moments as a game coach.
1) Maryland 2002 - Yes, UConn lost, but I think Calhoun squeezed every ounce out of this team, and almost took down the eventual national champion. Every move he made was right in this game. I thought sitting Butler was the right move, and he dialed Okafor back enough on that tub of lard Baxter to compensate for the refs treating Baxter like he was Karl Malone. Blake misses that 3 with 25 seconds left and I think a team who's second best player is Johnnie Selvie goes to the Final Four.
2) San Diego State 2011 - one of the best coached basketball games by both coaches I think I had seen until Michigan State/UConn 2014.
3) Duke 1999 and Kentucky 2014 - I put these in the same bucket. For all the accolades of the big/big double teams on Brand, UConn won the 1999 game the same way it won the 2014 game, by dominating the other team's guards defensively. Calhoun had a huge speed advantage on the perimeter, and he stepped on the other teams' throat with it. I put the Langdon travel in the same category at the Harrison untouched backcourt. The other team was so intimidated by UConn's speed that skilled players made mistakes they would never have made otherwise.
Others?
I don't agree at all. He developed wonderful game plans and most of them worked to perfection but he is far from a great game coach, making adjustments on the fly. It wasn't a part of his DNA. There was also his Irish stubbornness when he often refused to bend. Maybe that has more to do with my and other's impressions that he wasn't a good game coach. He stayed locked into his pregame mindset and that was it, win or lose! Not to say he would lose gracefully because he's always had a lot of passion.
1) Maryland 2002... a team who's second best player is Johnnie Selvie
Please stop repeating this as if its true. You are not a fraction as witty as you think you are.
Tony Robertson, Taliek Brown, Ben Gordon, and Emeka Okafor would all easily be listed ahead of Selvie on any list of "best players" on the 2002 team. If not all four of them, then without question, at least ONE of them, thereby invalidating your foolish quip that you seem so proud to repeat at every possible opportunity.
I don't believe that he was the greatest at everything and yes, there were many instances where he could not get his players to respond well (2006 is glaring, especially when compared to some of his earlier accomplishments, such as the 1988 NIT where at times it appeared that the force of JC's will alone carried that team to the title).
He had many flaws as a head coach. The thing is, all of his contemporaries also had many flaws. When looking at his contemporaries, I cannot think of anyone who I can state was better in game than JC was. I may be overlooking someone but I can think of many current and future HOF coaches who have many flawed results on their resume, I cannot think one who I would put ahead of JC.
They were both already better than Selvie. Selvie was a decent scorer at the four, but he didn't make his free throws, he didn't rebound well, and he turned the ball over a ton.
Pitino, Izzo, Donovan and Calipari are better game coaches than Calhoun. I would say Bennett, Ryan, Wright and Dixon are too. Carnessecca, Tark and Keady were three of the best game coaches I have ever seen. Coach K used to be a great game coach, but he has faded badly in recent years. I think Roy Williams is an excellent game coach, but he has faded badly on player development recently. Boeheim and Chaney might as well stayed home for games because their coaching basically ended when practice ended.
Calhoun's insane stubbornness helped and hurt at times. It helped because it inspired confidence and trust in Calhoun, it hurt because when Calhoun was wrong, he could be really wrong. Calhoun was the best player development coach in the history of college basketball, and even Calhoun critics would agree with that or at least acknowledge he was one of the best. When you are the "best ever" at an aspect of coaching that comprises 30% or 40% or 50% (pick a number) of what a coach does, you can get away with not being the best on some of the other aspects of coaching.