- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 595
- Reaction Score
- 434
Can't be a good sign if the local high school coaches are disappointed, if that is in fact true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you just refer to Pasqualoni as piss poor?
Can't be a good sign if the local high school coaches are disappointed, if that is in fact true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can't be a good sign if the local high school coaches are disappointed, if that is in fact true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you just refer to Pasqualoni as piss poor?
Did you just refer to Pasqualoni as piss poor?
Yes. He needs derogatory names for people he wants to put down. Too much trouble to try to do so by rationally building a case against him using TAPATALK.
LOL that was funny.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They need to get over themselves if that's the truth. At the level we're at and the level we want to get to, we recurit based on a players abiltiy, not because his high school coach might wan to have his belly patted.Can't be a good sign if the local high school coaches are disappointed, if that is in fact true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe coach p is preparing for some transfers ..... Out of storrs?
Thanks husky supporter I figured someone of you guys would have the scoop!
Yes sir, not fan.
Of what? His going 5-7 with Edsall's players?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm not a fan of. Not to mention not playing Nebrich when his redshirt was long gone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Only thing I disagree with is Nebrich playing more. I was of the opinion that once you play him, you have to go with him, but the more I think back, I'm not convinced that we get to even 5-7 with him. I know palatine will get all upset, after all he saw Nebrich against 16 year olds in one dimentional pass defenses, but it was pretty clear that the kid simply wasn't ready for the main stage based on his play. Given our recruiting, especially Whitmer, I think there is some doubt as to whether he will be ready by the UMass game this year. Pasquoloni is in this to win. I have no doubt about that. Given that, I think they used the quarterbacks they felt gave them the best chance.Agree on the use of Nebrich, disagree on the 5-7. I believe they burned his redshirt thinking he was going to be a contributor, but changed their minds after seeing him in action. Whether or not they were right or wrong for not playing Nebrich is not something we'll ever know. I think they should have, but that's just an opinion. I/we could be wrong.
As far as 5-7, with glaring issues at QB/WR and RB, the end results weren't all that bad. If we played some of the early season games that we lost, later in the season, after the staff had a better idea of who could do what, I feel confident in saying we would have made a bowl game.
It is what it is, Vandy, Iowa State and Western Michigan were all capable bowl teams, and they played us early, as we were still finding our way.
Agree on the use of Nebrich, disagree on the 5-7. I believe they burned his redshirt thinking he was going to be a contributor, but changed their minds after seeing him in action. Whether or not they were right or wrong for not playing Nebrich is not something we'll ever know. I think they should have, but that's just an opinion. I/we could be wrong.
As far as 5-7, with glaring issues at QB/WR and RB, the end results weren't all that bad. If we played some of the early season games that we lost, later in the season, after the staff had a better idea of who could do what, I feel confident in saying we would have made a bowl game.
It is what it is, Vandy, Iowa State and Western Michigan were all capable bowl teams, and they played us early, as we were still finding our way.