And consider that there's reason to give Helfrich another year, he averaged 11 wins his first three years and had his first bad year this year. Oregon can make that statement because 1) it's not blatantly obvious that Helfrich needs to be fired immediately, and 2) they have the money to pay his buyout if they do decide to do that. Neither of those two conditions are true for UConn. There's no consideration necessary whether Diaco deserves another year based on merit, he does not. We apparently do not have the money to pay his buyout if the decision to fire him is made.
That means a "we'll meet and evaluate" statement from Benedict is meaningless and would only infuriate the fanbase even more. What's there to meet with Diaco evaluate from a merit perspective? Diaco imploded this season in a way few coaches have ever done so and done irreparable harm to his reputation as a head coach. By all metrics, he should be fired. There's nothing to "evaluate" from a merit standpoint, therefore such a statement from DB wouldn't accomplish anything positive.