"Because I can't putt like those guys"... | Page 3 | The Boneyard

"Because I can't putt like those guys"...

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,485
Reaction Score
10,777
I can't comment on the golf angle... But there are a bunch of factors in the other sports. Some of it is pure or untapped talent, some of it is innate athletic (or not) ability, and some of it is just plain luck. One of the math teachers in my high school was UConn's go-to guy for math help for recruits. So recruits would, at times, be in our high school. I played two-on-two with the best player in my high school against Ajou Deng and another guy. The level of talent differential there was out of this world. We could hardly get a shot off and Ajou took it easy on us and plain destroyed us. I played in an alumni baseball game against a semi-pro pitcher. Hit a dong off his fastball. The next at-bat he decided to show me what a real slider looked like. Never could touch one. The Scalabrine example is perfect. He was a laughing stock of sorts for many plans as he looked so slow and unathletic. He absolutely destroys people when they challenge him.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
16,706
Reaction Score
19,933
Putting Bouk in the same category as Rudy Gay is a huge insult to Rudy. While Rudy never won a championship at UConn, he has played almost 1200 games and started almost 800 games. He has been in the league for over 15 years. He's was a very good scorer in the NBA for a decade. Bouk hasn't shown the ability to sustain anything in the NBA for more than a game or two. Rudy has had to work plenty hard to do what he did and be where he is.

I am talking about skill and natural ability, and surely Bouknight was on a different level than all of his teammates. This has nothing to do with what anyone does after college or the other attributes required to be great. Bouk didn't even start playing basketball until middle school which shows you how skilled he was. Did you even watch Bouk at UConn? Bouk actually averaged more points per game and more points per minute than Gay. Granted Gay played with better teammates overall but nevertheless.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,643
Reaction Score
98,972
I am talking about skill and natural ability, and surely Bouknight was on a different level than all of his teammates. This has nothing to do with what anyone does after college or the other attributes required to be great. Bouk didn't even start playing basketball until middle school which shows you how skilled he was. Did you even watch Bouk at UConn? Bouk actually averaged more points per game and more points per minute than Gay. Granted Gay played with better teammates overall but nevertheless.

Your quote is "Guys like Rudy Gay and James Bouknight are incredibly skilled but not the strongest physically on the court and never seemed like the hardest workers to me."

I won't pretend I know how you perceive anything, but IMO, grouping Gay's work ethic as a pro with Bouk's effort as a pro (so far) is a big insult to Rudy. No one makes is this long in the NBA on talent alone. All the aspects of being a professional athlete from being on time for meetings, practices, staying clean with law enforcement, being a good teammate, etc are needed to last as long as Rudy has lasted.

Did many UConn fans have dreams of Rudy being a National Player of the Year in college and leading UConn to championships? Sure. He always had glimpses of transcendent skill. Did UConn fans think he'd make All-star games and lead teams to great success in the NBA? Sure, some did. But he made himself a starter and key player on some real good Grizzlies teams early in his career and has figured out how to be better than an end of bench guy for more than 15 years. And doing that takes way more skill and effort than you give him credit for if you see him and Bouk in the same light.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,643
Reaction Score
98,972
First of all lol how golf heavy this is. Golfers are hilarious. You’re not special. Golfers are not special. They just think they are.

None of all this matters. There are 3 components to top line success, and it doesn’t matter if you are striking a little white ball with a stick, writing elegant computer code, getting OJ off for murder, tackling fast running backs, or cooking a risotto that will make your knees buckle. It’s all the same

1) inherent aptitude ( born with in simple terms) inherent talent for specific items
2)recognizing the aptitude for that item (this is huge)
3) developing proficiency through incredibly thorough training in the recognized field.

People can be good at any of a number of things by a various combination of a couple of the above. The pros check all boxes to some extent . The true greats ( in every field) are in the 99.9 percentile in at least 2 of those boxes.

This ain’t about athletics , it’s about human potential.

The thing I go back to with golf, is if it was really that simple at the pro level, more people would do it. It's a global sport and pays pretty good money for a game that requires you to walk around on manicured turf and travel all over the world. But it's not much different than other sports, that by the time you finish college, you have a good enough idea if you can make a living from it, or if you are going to make a living doing something else and loading up on club championship trophies.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,519
There was an episode of M*A*S*H, where in saving a soldier's arm from amputation, Winchester's surgery rendered the right hand of the soldier, a concert pianist back in the World, useless. Regardless, Winchester keep referring to his ability in the present tense, culminating with, "I have hands...I can play the notes, but I cannot make music."

Alas, talent can get one only so far. Professional athletes (musicians, artists, etc. Anyone who makes a living at a "hobby.") are nearly sociopathic in their passion and dedication to their singular goal, and few (if any) things are prioritized over achieving it. Weekend warrior have a day job. Weekend warriors play. This is a professional athlete's day job. They are working.

MLB hitters hit 15 balls a piece during pregame batting practice. Fans don't see the triple digit number of balls they've already seen that day, before the gates open.

Larry Bird would shoot 500 jump shots and make 99 consecutive free throws before sunrise, and then go to work on strength and conditioning...before practice.

I believe it was Brianna Stewart who once described a "Geno philosophy (In quotes only because I don't believe he was the first to come up with it)," where they don't stop practicing when they get a play right. They keep practicing until they can't get the play wrong.

Similarly, Tom Brady said after the Patriots comeback Super Bowl win over the Falcons, “I have the answers to the test now. You can’t surprise me on defense. I’ve seen it all. I’ve processed 261 games, I’ve played them all."

And finally, to bring it back to golf, which is what 90% of this thread's posts seem to reference, The Travelers Championship Pro-Am is probably at least the fourth time around the course, in various forms, for most of the golfers, not counting the hours on the practice green or chipping area. They aren't messing around. They are setting up and practicing scenarios.

That is the difference between Joe Montana and Joe sick-pack.

The difference between Derek Jeter and Enrique Wilson is quite a bit more subtle, as they both can recognize a curveball by pitcher's grip and spin. They could both process the information they saw in a split second. They both can probably still throw a frozen rope 200 feet with pace. Whether it was physical ability or mental awareness, one was better equipped/prepared than the other.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,667
Reaction Score
96,159
I've found that your average Joe underestimates just how good pros are at their sport. I know nothing about golf--I'm referring to boxing and basketball (the two sports I competed in).

I was a crappy D2 basketball player that barely saw the floor. When I was in college, I was making 500 3s a day, on top of practice and lifting. I could go to a men's league or charter oak in Manchester and score 11 straight any time I felt like it without breaking a sweat. And I wasn't even good. I'm still terrible. Your average dude running the court at the park can't shoot well or even dribble with both hands without looking down.

Boxing is even worse. Half the planet thinks "I'll see red" and decides they know how to fight. But the reality is your average person doesn't know how to throw a punch without breaking their hand or how to keep their eyes open when they get hit, let alone counters, head movement, and footwork. Again, I was a good (not great) amateur... this isn't even considering what a PROFESSIONAL fighter could do.

Put me in any other sport, and I'll make an absolute fool of myself. I tried to join a pickleball league and lost every single game in the season. It was horrible.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,519
Dang it. After the edit period.

If it's not obvious enough, I meant to say, "Joe six-pack."
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
1,637
Reaction Score
6,930
I've found that your average Joe underestimates just how good pros are at their sport. I know nothing about golf--I'm referring to boxing and basketball (the two sports I competed in).

I was a crappy D2 basketball player that barely saw the floor. When I was in college, I was making 500 3s a day, on top of practice and lifting. I could go to a men's league or charter oak in Manchester and score 11 straight any time I felt like it without breaking a sweat. And I wasn't even good. I'm still terrible. Your average dude running the court at the park can't shoot well or even dribble with both hands without looking down.

Boxing is even worse. Half the planet thinks "I'll see red" and decides they know how to fight. But the reality is your average person doesn't know how to throw a punch without breaking their hand or how to keep their eyes open when they get hit, let alone counters, head movement, and footwork. Again, I was a good (not great) amateur... this isn't even considering what a PROFESSIONAL fighter could do.

Put me in any other sport, and I'll make an absolute fool of myself. I tried to join a pickleball league and lost every single game in the season. It was horrible.
And you know you still have to be damn good to play D2. I played in a rec league where I had to guard a former D2 guard. He left me flat footed. He did it to everyone else too. And there were guys in that gym who were strutting around with their Rec-Specs acting like kings of the hardwood until D2 came in and made them look like a fool. Now I think of the discrepancy between that D2 dude and the other rec league dudes and it was a mile wide: then I think of the difference between him and a Richie Springs and it was probably just as wide.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,519
And you know you still have to be damn good to play D2. I played in a rec league where I had to guard a former D2 guard. He left me flat footed. He did it to everyone else too. And there were guys in that gym who were strutting around with their Rec-Specs acting like kings of the hardwood until D2 came in and made them look like a fool. Now I think of the discrepancy between that D2 dude and the other rec league dudes and it was a mile wide: then I think of the difference between him and a Richie Springs and it was probably just as wide.
No different with Div. 3 players.
 

QDOG5

I dont have a drug problem I have a police problem
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Messages
1,797
Reaction Score
8,194
To me one of the most amazing golf records is consecutive holes without a three putt. 542!! It is held by Freddie Jacobsen, a Swede who is no longer on tour. Crazy.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,667
Reaction Score
96,159
No different with Div. 3 players.

D3 has a pretty wide range. Better D3 teams could probably hang with most D2 teams. Lower-level D3 (there's a bunch in Jersey I know of) barely resembles basketball.

The difference between D2 and D3 is much bigger than between D2 and non-P7ish basketball. Very few D3 players get a scholly and move up because they aren't big enough, usually. D2 guys are moving up to D1 at alarming rates with new transfer rules.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,527
Reaction Score
19,519
D3 has a pretty wide range. Better D3 teams could probably hang with most D2 teams. Lower-level D3 (there's a bunch in Jersey I know of) barely resembles basketball.

The difference between D2 and D3 is much bigger than between D2 and non-P7ish basketball. Very few D3 players get a scholly and move up because they aren't big enough, usually. D2 guys are moving up to D1 at alarming rates with new transfer rules.

I played rec basketball regularly with a former player for Skidmore.

If not for being about 5'10" with lifts he maybe could have walked-on a mid-major squad back in the day...perhaps at a level of a practice player for the UConn Women. Of course, my memories of those days can legally drink.

The kid (Use the term loosely. He's in his mid-40s by now) could shoot and was smooth with the ball.
 

Online statistics

Members online
486
Guests online
4,929
Total visitors
5,415

Forum statistics

Threads
157,135
Messages
4,084,890
Members
9,980
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom