BC: Good Company to Have | The Boneyard
.-.

BC: Good Company to Have

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
3
Reaction Score
34
Hey guys, long time reader, first time poster. We may not need another BC thread, but I wanted to introduce myself. I just want to say this series is great for New England and even better for us. I live on the border of MA and CT so I'm surrounded by a nice mixture of UConn/BC/UMass fans, which will hopefully create a nice atmosphere during the football season. I write this post pleased that UMass is included, but obviously more so to finally play BC. I'll be writing about BC, but just know UMass is involved, because like a little brother, they may not be as cool or fun to hang out with, but they're "family" in this sense. We finally have the structure in place for a true regional rival that we can embrace and look forward to. For some of us in CT, UMass and BC will be the closest road games we can possibly go to. Taking a trip to BC would require very little planning and be a short day trip against a program with (and it hurts me to say) some sparse yet historic moments in CFB giving them a solid football pedigree. In recent years, Matt Ryan, Luke Kuechly and B.J. Raji have been 2 of the better players at their positions and Andre Williams won the Doak Walker in 2013. They have a national title and a Heisman winner and if you check wiki, their rivals are Miami, Syracuse and Notre Dame among others, but we're not on it. Like it or not, BC is good company to have. It'll be great for recruiting CT players and their families playing a P5 team as a rival the next state over and we can use it to get some of the better MA or New England players. Too bad we'll go 4 years without playing BC (the athletes we recruit who begin 2018 won't get to play BC unless they redshirt). Would've been nice to at least switch every other 2 years between the 2 schools.

Rivalry Game Names: We could call it "The New England Chowder Cup/Bowl", "The Chowder Cup/Bowl", "The Oyster", "The Lobster Claw", or "The Founder's Cup". For "The Oyster", the trophy could be a big (obviously fake) pearl that the winner could paint their teams colors, and keep on a nice stand when its not being painted or passed around after the game, kinda like the UNC vs Duke football trophy that they paint every year. Or maybe a football that's colored like an oyster. Seafood theme could be a strong regional identifier that the rest of the country can't call their own (maybe the oysters, but still). I think it would be intriguing for the rest of the country to watch "The Chowder Bowl". What we don't have in football tradition, we definitely have in colonial tradition. We can't make up for the 110 games Michigan has played Ohio State but we definitely have them on national history and years settled lol. Could be our FBS version of "The Game" between Yale-Harvard, which hosted college gameday last year and lived up to the hype.

We have obvious advantages to playing BC because of their name, location, history, and the fact that they're a P5 opponent, but I think they'll gladly reciprocate the rivalry because of our name, location, maybe a few basketball games throw in there, and perhaps the fact that we (gulp) tried to sue them might have left a bad taste in their mouth and may fuel their motivation too. Regardless of how they're made, we saw what rivalries can do for our student athletes and coaches when they played UCF. The game made national headlines for many reasons, but most importantly got people around the country aware of if not interested in UConn football. We need to capitalize on this opportunity and make it a long-standing tradition.

Just a somewhat quick thought that I felt was appropriate for my first post. Go Huskies!
 
Great post. And please don't listen to the naysayers on this subject. It's all good-- for everyone. I'm excited about it and as someone who lives in Boston, don't believe for a minute that BC isn't interested in playing or beating us. It can quickly become the marquee game on both of our schedules, given some time to percolate.
 
I like the idea of having the three teams play each year. We could have the New England equivalent of the Commander in Chief trophy that the service academies play for. The name is just the name, the right to hold it and to claim it is what you play for. I like the idea of not having a "trophy" but having an object, a Chowda Pot, a lobster trap, something that ties the region together... Each year the team that has the best record head to head between the three teams keeps it for another year. If everyone is 1-1 then the team that has the item keeps the item...in order to take from the current holder you need to win both games...
 
I can expect we will see Chowda Bowl in the media. It's too cheesy to pass on.
 
.-.
Just call it the "Colonies Cup". Both CT and MA were part of the original colonies. On the trophy have a pilgrim dressed in red & white, one dressed in maroon and gold and the third dressed in blue and white all staring at each other with a football at their feet.
 
I'm with weyuo, but favor "The Colonial Cup". Have three pilgrims on it and they get painted the winning team's color for the year.
 
Great post. And please don't listen to the naysayers on this subject. It's all good-- for everyone. I'm excited about it and as someone who lives in Boston, don't believe for a minute that BC isn't interested in playing or beating us. It can quickly become the marquee game on both of our schedules, given some time to percolate.
With all due respect Nostical, it needs no time to percolate. BC and every single thing about them. You may call it the Chowder Bowl, but I prefer to call it the Toilet Bowl after we dispose of them. The school, their fans, their old (not new) Athletic admin and former director, their egotistical alumni .... need time to percolate...DON'T think so!
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
497
Guests online
13,657
Total visitors
14,154

Forum statistics

Threads
165,383
Messages
4,434,269
Members
10,286
Latest member
John15:4


p
p
Top Bottom