- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,276
- Reaction Score
- 2,943
Do any of the resident Sox fans have any insight into the thinking on this ? I've been wondering this all winter.
Its usually not a move any team makes because guys end up in relief for a reason. They only tried him for a single season in the minor leagues as a starter and he was a disaster. They moved him to relief and he thrived.
I just don't understand the basis upon which to think that a 2 pitch pitcher with no history of success as a starter who has never thrown more than 77 innings as a pro can translate to the starting rotation. Even if he is good, which is unlikely, the most he could do is start like 20 games, assuming they are willing to exceed the usual 30 inning increase and assuming he averages 6 innings per game.
Any ideas ?
Its usually not a move any team makes because guys end up in relief for a reason. They only tried him for a single season in the minor leagues as a starter and he was a disaster. They moved him to relief and he thrived.
I just don't understand the basis upon which to think that a 2 pitch pitcher with no history of success as a starter who has never thrown more than 77 innings as a pro can translate to the starting rotation. Even if he is good, which is unlikely, the most he could do is start like 20 games, assuming they are willing to exceed the usual 30 inning increase and assuming he averages 6 innings per game.
Any ideas ?